跌倒效能:扩展老年人对跌倒管理的自我效能的理解。

Shawn Leng-Hsien Soh, Chee-Wee Tan, Janet I Thomas, Gideon Tan, Tianma Xu, Yoke Leng Ng, Judith Lane
{"title":"跌倒效能:扩展老年人对跌倒管理的自我效能的理解。","authors":"Shawn Leng-Hsien Soh,&nbsp;Chee-Wee Tan,&nbsp;Janet I Thomas,&nbsp;Gideon Tan,&nbsp;Tianma Xu,&nbsp;Yoke Leng Ng,&nbsp;Judith Lane","doi":"10.22540/JFSF-06-131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Falls efficacy is a widely studied construct. The understanding of falls efficacy has evolved over time. Falls efficacy was initially perceived to be suitably used as a measure of fear of falling. However, further research suggested that falls efficacy and fear of falling are distinct constructs, and therefore, would be inappropriate to be used as a proxy. Instead, some researchers posited that falls efficacy is synonymous with balance confidence. Falls efficacy has been conventionally understood as the perceived ability of individuals to perform activities without losing balance or falling. A recently conducted systematic review by the authors on existing falls efficacy related measures had revealed a fresh perspective of recognising falls efficacy as a perceived ability to manage a threat of a fall. Falls efficacy, with a broadened interpreted construct, relates to the individual's perceived self-efficacy of performing necessary actions needed in different scenarios, including pre-fall, near-fall, fall-landing and completed fall. The conventional interpretation of falls efficacy needs a rethinking of perspective. An extended understanding of falls efficacy would provide an integral approach towards improving the agency of individual to deal with falls and would enhance person-centred care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","volume":"6 3","pages":"131-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/3d/JFSF-6-131.PMC8419849.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Falls efficacy: Extending the understanding of self-efficacy in older adults towards managing falls.\",\"authors\":\"Shawn Leng-Hsien Soh,&nbsp;Chee-Wee Tan,&nbsp;Janet I Thomas,&nbsp;Gideon Tan,&nbsp;Tianma Xu,&nbsp;Yoke Leng Ng,&nbsp;Judith Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.22540/JFSF-06-131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Falls efficacy is a widely studied construct. The understanding of falls efficacy has evolved over time. Falls efficacy was initially perceived to be suitably used as a measure of fear of falling. However, further research suggested that falls efficacy and fear of falling are distinct constructs, and therefore, would be inappropriate to be used as a proxy. Instead, some researchers posited that falls efficacy is synonymous with balance confidence. Falls efficacy has been conventionally understood as the perceived ability of individuals to perform activities without losing balance or falling. A recently conducted systematic review by the authors on existing falls efficacy related measures had revealed a fresh perspective of recognising falls efficacy as a perceived ability to manage a threat of a fall. Falls efficacy, with a broadened interpreted construct, relates to the individual's perceived self-efficacy of performing necessary actions needed in different scenarios, including pre-fall, near-fall, fall-landing and completed fall. The conventional interpretation of falls efficacy needs a rethinking of perspective. An extended understanding of falls efficacy would provide an integral approach towards improving the agency of individual to deal with falls and would enhance person-centred care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"131-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/3d/JFSF-6-131.PMC8419849.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-06-131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-06-131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

瀑布功效是一个被广泛研究的概念。随着时间的推移,对瀑布功效的理解也在不断发展。跌倒的功效最初被认为是用来衡量人们对跌倒的恐惧程度。然而,进一步的研究表明,跌倒的有效性和对跌倒的恐惧是不同的概念,因此,不适合作为一个代理。相反,一些研究人员认为,跌倒功效与平衡自信是同义词。跌倒效能通常被理解为个人在不失去平衡或摔倒的情况下进行活动的感知能力。作者最近对现有的瀑布功效相关措施进行了系统回顾,揭示了将瀑布功效视为管理跌倒威胁的感知能力的新视角。跌倒效能是指个体在跌倒前、接近跌倒、落地和完成跌倒等不同情境下,对必要行为的自我效能感。对瀑布功效的传统解读需要重新思考视角。对跌倒功效的广泛了解将为改进个人处理跌倒的能力提供一种综合办法,并将加强以人为本的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Falls efficacy: Extending the understanding of self-efficacy in older adults towards managing falls.

Falls efficacy: Extending the understanding of self-efficacy in older adults towards managing falls.

Falls efficacy is a widely studied construct. The understanding of falls efficacy has evolved over time. Falls efficacy was initially perceived to be suitably used as a measure of fear of falling. However, further research suggested that falls efficacy and fear of falling are distinct constructs, and therefore, would be inappropriate to be used as a proxy. Instead, some researchers posited that falls efficacy is synonymous with balance confidence. Falls efficacy has been conventionally understood as the perceived ability of individuals to perform activities without losing balance or falling. A recently conducted systematic review by the authors on existing falls efficacy related measures had revealed a fresh perspective of recognising falls efficacy as a perceived ability to manage a threat of a fall. Falls efficacy, with a broadened interpreted construct, relates to the individual's perceived self-efficacy of performing necessary actions needed in different scenarios, including pre-fall, near-fall, fall-landing and completed fall. The conventional interpretation of falls efficacy needs a rethinking of perspective. An extended understanding of falls efficacy would provide an integral approach towards improving the agency of individual to deal with falls and would enhance person-centred care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信