韧带重建和肌腱介入与血肿牵张关节置换术治疗掌方关节关节炎的比较。

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2021-08-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01
Abolghasem Zarezadeh, Mohammad Dehghani, Abbas Shahruzian
{"title":"韧带重建和肌腱介入与血肿牵张关节置换术治疗掌方关节关节炎的比较。","authors":"Abolghasem Zarezadeh,&nbsp;Mohammad Dehghani,&nbsp;Abbas Shahruzian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Arthritis in trapeziometacarpal joint is one of the most common types of osteoarthritis which do not respond to conservative therapies in progressed cases and require surgical processes. The current study compares the two successful techniques, ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) versus hematoma distraction arthroplasty (HDA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current randomized clinical trial has been conducted on 56 patients with trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis whom were randomly divided into two groups undergone surgical procedures of LTRI (n=28) and HDA (n=28). The patients were evaluated regarding hand function, pain intensity and pinching power using The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), VAS and pulp pinching test, respectively, as well as radiological findings, including (proximal migration, lateral migration, and first web space) at baseline, within 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain intensity, pinching power, function based on DASH and radiological findings, including proximal and lateral migration and first web space significantly improved in a-year follow-up assessments (<i>P</i>-value <0.001). The comparison of the techniques showed superior results of HDA regarding pinching power (<i>P</i>-value =0.004) and DASH (<i>P</i>-value =0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on this study, both LTRI and HDA were accompanied by significant improvement in function, pinching power and decrease in pain among the patients with the first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis; however, the outcomes of HDA were generally superior.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449149/pdf/ijbt0011-0296.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition in comparison with hematoma distraction arthroplasty for the treatment of arthritis in the trapeziometacarpal joint.\",\"authors\":\"Abolghasem Zarezadeh,&nbsp;Mohammad Dehghani,&nbsp;Abbas Shahruzian\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Arthritis in trapeziometacarpal joint is one of the most common types of osteoarthritis which do not respond to conservative therapies in progressed cases and require surgical processes. The current study compares the two successful techniques, ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) versus hematoma distraction arthroplasty (HDA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current randomized clinical trial has been conducted on 56 patients with trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis whom were randomly divided into two groups undergone surgical procedures of LTRI (n=28) and HDA (n=28). The patients were evaluated regarding hand function, pain intensity and pinching power using The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), VAS and pulp pinching test, respectively, as well as radiological findings, including (proximal migration, lateral migration, and first web space) at baseline, within 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain intensity, pinching power, function based on DASH and radiological findings, including proximal and lateral migration and first web space significantly improved in a-year follow-up assessments (<i>P</i>-value <0.001). The comparison of the techniques showed superior results of HDA regarding pinching power (<i>P</i>-value =0.004) and DASH (<i>P</i>-value =0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on this study, both LTRI and HDA were accompanied by significant improvement in function, pinching power and decrease in pain among the patients with the first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis; however, the outcomes of HDA were generally superior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449149/pdf/ijbt0011-0296.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:斜跖关节关节炎是最常见的骨关节炎类型之一,在病情进展的情况下,保守治疗无效,需要手术治疗。目前的研究比较了两种成功的技术,韧带重建和肌腱介入(LRTI)与血肿牵张关节置换术(HDA)。方法:本随机临床试验选取56例斜跖关节骨性关节炎患者,随机分为两组,分别行LTRI (n=28)和HDA (n=28)。术后3个月、6个月和12个月分别使用手臂、肩膀和手的残疾(DASH)、VAS和牙髓捏捏试验评估患者的手功能、疼痛强度和捏捏能力,以及基线时的放射学表现,包括(近端移动、侧移和第一网隙)。结果:1年随访评估(p值=0.004)和DASH (p值=0.03)疼痛强度、捏痛能力、基于DASH和影像学表现的功能(包括近端和侧向移动和第一蹼空间)显著改善。结论:在本研究基础上,LTRI和HDA均能显著改善第一腕掌骨关节炎(CMC)患者的功能、捏捏力和疼痛减轻;然而,HDA的结果通常是优越的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition in comparison with hematoma distraction arthroplasty for the treatment of arthritis in the trapeziometacarpal joint.

Ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition in comparison with hematoma distraction arthroplasty for the treatment of arthritis in the trapeziometacarpal joint.

Ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition in comparison with hematoma distraction arthroplasty for the treatment of arthritis in the trapeziometacarpal joint.

Introduction: Arthritis in trapeziometacarpal joint is one of the most common types of osteoarthritis which do not respond to conservative therapies in progressed cases and require surgical processes. The current study compares the two successful techniques, ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) versus hematoma distraction arthroplasty (HDA).

Methods: The current randomized clinical trial has been conducted on 56 patients with trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis whom were randomly divided into two groups undergone surgical procedures of LTRI (n=28) and HDA (n=28). The patients were evaluated regarding hand function, pain intensity and pinching power using The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), VAS and pulp pinching test, respectively, as well as radiological findings, including (proximal migration, lateral migration, and first web space) at baseline, within 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Results: Pain intensity, pinching power, function based on DASH and radiological findings, including proximal and lateral migration and first web space significantly improved in a-year follow-up assessments (P-value <0.001). The comparison of the techniques showed superior results of HDA regarding pinching power (P-value =0.004) and DASH (P-value =0.03).

Conclusion: Based on this study, both LTRI and HDA were accompanied by significant improvement in function, pinching power and decrease in pain among the patients with the first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis; however, the outcomes of HDA were generally superior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信