提肛-尿道间隙:未怀孕未生育人群的标准数据。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
W Thomas Gregory, Meagan Cramer, Amanda Holland, Emily Boniface
{"title":"提肛-尿道间隙:未怀孕未生育人群的标准数据。","authors":"W Thomas Gregory,&nbsp;Meagan Cramer,&nbsp;Amanda Holland,&nbsp;Emily Boniface","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to establish a normative range of the levator-urethra gap (LUG) measurement in nonpregnant, nulliparous women to be used as a standard against which assessments of injury or avulsion of the levator ani could be made.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nulliparous women in the Pacific Northwest who were planning pregnancy within the ensuing 12 months underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography. In the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions, the LUG was measured on both the right and left sides for 3 contiguous image slices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirty-five participants underwent examinations, of which 134 had evaluable MRIs and 70 had evaluable ultrasounds. Mean (SD) age was 30.8 (4.0) years, and mean (SD) body mass index was 25.9 (6.4). The majority of the participants self-identified as White (80%) and non-Hispanic (89%). The 99th percentile was no greater than 2.39 cm on any slice for either MRI or US-based measurements. In the MRI set, the lowest LUG values at which all 3 measurements on a side were found to have exceeded a putative threshold value (for injury) were 2.1 cm for the right side and 2.05 cm for the left side. The corresponding LUG values in the ultrasound set were 2.2 cm on the right and 2.25 cm on the left.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LUG threshold in 3 successive slices in the minimal hiatal dimension suggestive of levator ani injury could be as low as 2.1 cm when using MRI and 2.25 cm when using ultrasound in a similar population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"27 12","pages":"e696-e700"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8608732/pdf/nihms-1745923.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levator-Urethra Gap: Normative Data in a Nonpregnant Nulliparous Population.\",\"authors\":\"W Thomas Gregory,&nbsp;Meagan Cramer,&nbsp;Amanda Holland,&nbsp;Emily Boniface\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to establish a normative range of the levator-urethra gap (LUG) measurement in nonpregnant, nulliparous women to be used as a standard against which assessments of injury or avulsion of the levator ani could be made.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nulliparous women in the Pacific Northwest who were planning pregnancy within the ensuing 12 months underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography. In the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions, the LUG was measured on both the right and left sides for 3 contiguous image slices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirty-five participants underwent examinations, of which 134 had evaluable MRIs and 70 had evaluable ultrasounds. Mean (SD) age was 30.8 (4.0) years, and mean (SD) body mass index was 25.9 (6.4). The majority of the participants self-identified as White (80%) and non-Hispanic (89%). The 99th percentile was no greater than 2.39 cm on any slice for either MRI or US-based measurements. In the MRI set, the lowest LUG values at which all 3 measurements on a side were found to have exceeded a putative threshold value (for injury) were 2.1 cm for the right side and 2.05 cm for the left side. The corresponding LUG values in the ultrasound set were 2.2 cm on the right and 2.25 cm on the left.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LUG threshold in 3 successive slices in the minimal hiatal dimension suggestive of levator ani injury could be as low as 2.1 cm when using MRI and 2.25 cm when using ultrasound in a similar population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"27 12\",\"pages\":\"e696-e700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8608732/pdf/nihms-1745923.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001115\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在建立非妊娠、未产妇女提肛肌-尿道间隙(LUG)测量的规范范围,作为评估提肛肌损伤或撕脱的标准。方法:对太平洋西北地区计划在12个月内怀孕的未生育妇女进行高分辨率磁共振成像(MRI)和三维会阴超声检查。在最小间隙尺寸平面上,对3个连续图像切片的左右两侧进行LUG测量。结果:135名参与者接受了检查,其中134人有可评估的核磁共振成像,70人有可评估的超声波。平均(SD)年龄为30.8(4.0)岁,平均(SD)体重指数为25.9(6.4)。大多数参与者自认为是白人(80%)和非西班牙裔(89%)。无论是MRI还是基于美国的测量,任何切片的第99百分位数都不大于2.39厘米。在MRI集中,发现一侧所有3个测量值均超过假定阈值(损伤)的最低LUG值为右侧2.1 cm,左侧2.05 cm。超声组对应的LUG值右侧为2.2 cm,左侧为2.25 cm。结论:在相似人群中,在最小裂孔尺寸连续3片的LUG阈值提示提肛肌损伤,MRI可低至2.1 cm,超声可低至2.25 cm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Levator-Urethra Gap: Normative Data in a Nonpregnant Nulliparous Population.

Levator-Urethra Gap: Normative Data in a Nonpregnant Nulliparous Population.

Levator-Urethra Gap: Normative Data in a Nonpregnant Nulliparous Population.

Objective: This study aimed to establish a normative range of the levator-urethra gap (LUG) measurement in nonpregnant, nulliparous women to be used as a standard against which assessments of injury or avulsion of the levator ani could be made.

Methods: Nulliparous women in the Pacific Northwest who were planning pregnancy within the ensuing 12 months underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography. In the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions, the LUG was measured on both the right and left sides for 3 contiguous image slices.

Results: One hundred thirty-five participants underwent examinations, of which 134 had evaluable MRIs and 70 had evaluable ultrasounds. Mean (SD) age was 30.8 (4.0) years, and mean (SD) body mass index was 25.9 (6.4). The majority of the participants self-identified as White (80%) and non-Hispanic (89%). The 99th percentile was no greater than 2.39 cm on any slice for either MRI or US-based measurements. In the MRI set, the lowest LUG values at which all 3 measurements on a side were found to have exceeded a putative threshold value (for injury) were 2.1 cm for the right side and 2.05 cm for the left side. The corresponding LUG values in the ultrasound set were 2.2 cm on the right and 2.25 cm on the left.

Conclusions: The LUG threshold in 3 successive slices in the minimal hiatal dimension suggestive of levator ani injury could be as low as 2.1 cm when using MRI and 2.25 cm when using ultrasound in a similar population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信