{"title":"阿登布鲁克认知检查的巴西版本-在阿尔茨海默病和行为变异性额颞叶痴呆的鉴别诊断中修订。","authors":"Viviane Amaral-Carvalho, Thais Bento Lima-Silva, Luciano Inácio Mariano, Leonardo Cruz de Souza, Henrique Cerqueira Guimarães, Valéria Santoro Bahia, Ricardo Nitrini, Maira Tonidandel Barbosa, Mônica Sanches Yassuda, Paulo Caramelli","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acab071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) are frequent causes of dementia and, therefore, instruments for differential diagnosis between these two conditions are of great relevance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) for differentiating AD from bvFTD in a Brazilian sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ACE-R was administered to 102 patients who had been diagnosed with mild dementia due to probable AD, 37 with mild bvFTD and 161 cognitively healthy controls, matched according to age and education. Additionally, all subjects were assessed using the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. The performance of patients and controls was compared by using univariate analysis, and ROC curves were calculated to investigate the accuracy of ACE-R for differentiating AD from bvFTD and for differentiating AD and bvFTD from controls. The verbal fluency plus language to orientation plus name and address delayed recall memory (VLOM) ratio was also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimum cutoff scores for ACE-R were <80 for AD, <79 for bvFTD, and <80 for dementia (AD + bvFTD), with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) (AUC) >0.85. For the differential diagnosis between AD and bvFTD, a VLOM ratio of 3.05 showed an AUC of 0.816 (Cohen's d = 1.151; p < .001), with 86.5% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity, 72.7% positive predictive value, and 85.7% negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Brazilian ACE-R achieved a good diagnostic accuracy for differentiating AD from bvFTD patients and for differentiating AD and bvFTD from the controls in the present sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":" ","pages":"437-448"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brazilian Version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised in the Differential Diagnosis of Alzheimer'S Disease and Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Viviane Amaral-Carvalho, Thais Bento Lima-Silva, Luciano Inácio Mariano, Leonardo Cruz de Souza, Henrique Cerqueira Guimarães, Valéria Santoro Bahia, Ricardo Nitrini, Maira Tonidandel Barbosa, Mônica Sanches Yassuda, Paulo Caramelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acab071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) are frequent causes of dementia and, therefore, instruments for differential diagnosis between these two conditions are of great relevance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) for differentiating AD from bvFTD in a Brazilian sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ACE-R was administered to 102 patients who had been diagnosed with mild dementia due to probable AD, 37 with mild bvFTD and 161 cognitively healthy controls, matched according to age and education. Additionally, all subjects were assessed using the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. The performance of patients and controls was compared by using univariate analysis, and ROC curves were calculated to investigate the accuracy of ACE-R for differentiating AD from bvFTD and for differentiating AD and bvFTD from controls. The verbal fluency plus language to orientation plus name and address delayed recall memory (VLOM) ratio was also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimum cutoff scores for ACE-R were <80 for AD, <79 for bvFTD, and <80 for dementia (AD + bvFTD), with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) (AUC) >0.85. For the differential diagnosis between AD and bvFTD, a VLOM ratio of 3.05 showed an AUC of 0.816 (Cohen's d = 1.151; p < .001), with 86.5% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity, 72.7% positive predictive value, and 85.7% negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Brazilian ACE-R achieved a good diagnostic accuracy for differentiating AD from bvFTD patients and for differentiating AD and bvFTD from the controls in the present sample.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"437-448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acab071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acab071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
阿尔茨海默病(AD)和行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)是痴呆的常见病因,因此,鉴别诊断这两种疾病的仪器具有重要意义。目的:探讨阿登布鲁克认知检查-修订(ACE-R)在巴西样本中区分AD和bvFTD的诊断准确性。方法:采用ACE-R对102例诊断为可能为AD的轻度痴呆患者、37例轻度bvFTD患者和161例认知健康对照进行对照,根据年龄和受教育程度进行匹配。此外,所有受试者都使用马蒂斯痴呆评定量表和神经精神量表进行评估。采用单因素分析比较患者和对照组的表现,并计算ROC曲线,探讨ACE-R区分AD和bvFTD以及AD和bvFTD与对照组的准确性。语言流畅性、语言取向、姓名和地址延迟回忆记忆(VLOM)的比值也进行了计算。结果:ACE-R的最佳临界值为0.85。对于AD和bvFTD的鉴别诊断,VLOM比值为3.05,AUC为0.816 (Cohen’s d = 1.151;结论:在本样本中,巴西ACE-R在区分AD和bvFTD患者以及区分AD和bvFTD与对照组方面取得了良好的诊断准确性。
Brazilian Version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised in the Differential Diagnosis of Alzheimer'S Disease and Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia.
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) are frequent causes of dementia and, therefore, instruments for differential diagnosis between these two conditions are of great relevance.
Objective: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) for differentiating AD from bvFTD in a Brazilian sample.
Methods: The ACE-R was administered to 102 patients who had been diagnosed with mild dementia due to probable AD, 37 with mild bvFTD and 161 cognitively healthy controls, matched according to age and education. Additionally, all subjects were assessed using the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. The performance of patients and controls was compared by using univariate analysis, and ROC curves were calculated to investigate the accuracy of ACE-R for differentiating AD from bvFTD and for differentiating AD and bvFTD from controls. The verbal fluency plus language to orientation plus name and address delayed recall memory (VLOM) ratio was also calculated.
Results: The optimum cutoff scores for ACE-R were <80 for AD, <79 for bvFTD, and <80 for dementia (AD + bvFTD), with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) (AUC) >0.85. For the differential diagnosis between AD and bvFTD, a VLOM ratio of 3.05 showed an AUC of 0.816 (Cohen's d = 1.151; p < .001), with 86.5% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity, 72.7% positive predictive value, and 85.7% negative predictive value.
Conclusions: The Brazilian ACE-R achieved a good diagnostic accuracy for differentiating AD from bvFTD patients and for differentiating AD and bvFTD from the controls in the present sample.