南非艾滋病毒检测的地理差异:来自2017年全国家庭艾滋病毒调查的证据。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Southern African Journal of Hiv Medicine Pub Date : 2021-08-31 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajhivmed.v22i1.1273
Sean Jooste, Musawenkosi Mabaso, Myra Taylor, Alicia North, Yolande Shean, Leickness C Simbayi, Tarylee Reddy, Leonard Mwandingi, Tenielle Schmidt, Portia Nevhungoni, Samuel Manda, Khangelani Zuma
{"title":"南非艾滋病毒检测的地理差异:来自2017年全国家庭艾滋病毒调查的证据。","authors":"Sean Jooste,&nbsp;Musawenkosi Mabaso,&nbsp;Myra Taylor,&nbsp;Alicia North,&nbsp;Yolande Shean,&nbsp;Leickness C Simbayi,&nbsp;Tarylee Reddy,&nbsp;Leonard Mwandingi,&nbsp;Tenielle Schmidt,&nbsp;Portia Nevhungoni,&nbsp;Samuel Manda,&nbsp;Khangelani Zuma","doi":"10.4102/sajhivmed.v22i1.1273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identification of the geographical areas with low uptake of HIV testing could assist in spatial targeting of interventions to improve the uptake of HIV testing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this research study was to map the uptake of HIV testing at the district level in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The secondary analysis used data from the Human Sciences Research Council's 2017 National HIV Prevalence, Incidence, Behaviour and Communication Survey, where data were collected using a multistage stratified random cluster sampling approach. Descriptive spatial methods were used to assess disparities in the proportion of those ever tested for HIV at the district level in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The districts with the highest overall coverage of people ever having tested for HIV (> 85%) include West Rand in Gauteng, Lejweleputswa and Thabo Mofutsanyane in Free State, and Ngaka Modiri Molema in North-West. These provinces also had the least variation in HIV testing coverage between their districts. Districts in KwaZulu-Natal had the widest variation in coverage of HIV testing. The districts with the lowest uptake of HIV testing were uMkhanyakude (54.7%) and Ugu (61.4%) in KwaZulu-Natal and Vhembe (61.0%) in Limpopo. Most districts had a higher uptake of HIV testing amongst female than male participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The uptake of HIV testing across various districts in South Africa seems to be unequal. Intervention programmes must improve the overall uptake of HIV testing, especially in uMkhanyakude and Ugu in KwaZulu-Natal and Vhembe in Limpopo. Interventions must also focus on enhancing uptake of HIV testing amongst male participants in most districts. Strategies that would improve the uptake of HIV testing include HIV self-testing and community HIV testing, specifically home-based testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":49489,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Hiv Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424727/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographical variation in HIV testing in South Africa: Evidence from the 2017 national household HIV survey.\",\"authors\":\"Sean Jooste,&nbsp;Musawenkosi Mabaso,&nbsp;Myra Taylor,&nbsp;Alicia North,&nbsp;Yolande Shean,&nbsp;Leickness C Simbayi,&nbsp;Tarylee Reddy,&nbsp;Leonard Mwandingi,&nbsp;Tenielle Schmidt,&nbsp;Portia Nevhungoni,&nbsp;Samuel Manda,&nbsp;Khangelani Zuma\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajhivmed.v22i1.1273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identification of the geographical areas with low uptake of HIV testing could assist in spatial targeting of interventions to improve the uptake of HIV testing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this research study was to map the uptake of HIV testing at the district level in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The secondary analysis used data from the Human Sciences Research Council's 2017 National HIV Prevalence, Incidence, Behaviour and Communication Survey, where data were collected using a multistage stratified random cluster sampling approach. Descriptive spatial methods were used to assess disparities in the proportion of those ever tested for HIV at the district level in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The districts with the highest overall coverage of people ever having tested for HIV (> 85%) include West Rand in Gauteng, Lejweleputswa and Thabo Mofutsanyane in Free State, and Ngaka Modiri Molema in North-West. These provinces also had the least variation in HIV testing coverage between their districts. Districts in KwaZulu-Natal had the widest variation in coverage of HIV testing. The districts with the lowest uptake of HIV testing were uMkhanyakude (54.7%) and Ugu (61.4%) in KwaZulu-Natal and Vhembe (61.0%) in Limpopo. Most districts had a higher uptake of HIV testing amongst female than male participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The uptake of HIV testing across various districts in South Africa seems to be unequal. Intervention programmes must improve the overall uptake of HIV testing, especially in uMkhanyakude and Ugu in KwaZulu-Natal and Vhembe in Limpopo. Interventions must also focus on enhancing uptake of HIV testing amongst male participants in most districts. Strategies that would improve the uptake of HIV testing include HIV self-testing and community HIV testing, specifically home-based testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern African Journal of Hiv Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424727/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern African Journal of Hiv Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v22i1.1273\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Hiv Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v22i1.1273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:确定艾滋病毒检测使用率低的地理区域有助于在空间上确定干预措施的目标,以提高艾滋病毒检测的使用率。目的:本研究的目的是绘制南非地区一级艾滋病毒检测的吸收情况。方法:二次分析使用了人类科学研究委员会2017年全国艾滋病毒流行、发病率、行为和传播调查的数据,其中数据采用多阶段分层随机整群抽样方法收集。使用描述性空间方法来评估南非地区一级接受过艾滋病毒检测的人的比例差异。结果:接受过艾滋病毒检测的人总体覆盖率最高的地区(> 85%)包括豪登省的西兰德、自由邦的lejweeleputswa和Thabo Mofutsanyane以及西北部的Ngaka Modiri Molema。这些省份的地区之间艾滋病毒检测覆盖率的差异也最小。夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省各区的艾滋病毒检测覆盖率差异最大。艾滋病毒检测使用率最低的地区是夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的乌姆汉亚库德(54.7%)和乌古(61.4%),以及林波波省的Vhembe(61.0%)。大多数地区女性接受艾滋病毒检测的比例高于男性。结论:南非各区对艾滋病毒检测的接受情况似乎不平等。干预方案必须改善艾滋病毒检测的总体接受情况,特别是在夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的乌姆汉亚库德和乌古以及林波波省的Vhembe。干预措施还必须注重在大多数地区的男性参与者中加强艾滋病毒检测。改善艾滋病毒检测的战略包括艾滋病毒自我检测和社区艾滋病毒检测,特别是家庭检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Geographical variation in HIV testing in South Africa: Evidence from the 2017 national household HIV survey.

Geographical variation in HIV testing in South Africa: Evidence from the 2017 national household HIV survey.

Geographical variation in HIV testing in South Africa: Evidence from the 2017 national household HIV survey.

Geographical variation in HIV testing in South Africa: Evidence from the 2017 national household HIV survey.

Background: Identification of the geographical areas with low uptake of HIV testing could assist in spatial targeting of interventions to improve the uptake of HIV testing.

Objectives: The objective of this research study was to map the uptake of HIV testing at the district level in South Africa.

Method: The secondary analysis used data from the Human Sciences Research Council's 2017 National HIV Prevalence, Incidence, Behaviour and Communication Survey, where data were collected using a multistage stratified random cluster sampling approach. Descriptive spatial methods were used to assess disparities in the proportion of those ever tested for HIV at the district level in South Africa.

Results: The districts with the highest overall coverage of people ever having tested for HIV (> 85%) include West Rand in Gauteng, Lejweleputswa and Thabo Mofutsanyane in Free State, and Ngaka Modiri Molema in North-West. These provinces also had the least variation in HIV testing coverage between their districts. Districts in KwaZulu-Natal had the widest variation in coverage of HIV testing. The districts with the lowest uptake of HIV testing were uMkhanyakude (54.7%) and Ugu (61.4%) in KwaZulu-Natal and Vhembe (61.0%) in Limpopo. Most districts had a higher uptake of HIV testing amongst female than male participants.

Conclusion: The uptake of HIV testing across various districts in South Africa seems to be unequal. Intervention programmes must improve the overall uptake of HIV testing, especially in uMkhanyakude and Ugu in KwaZulu-Natal and Vhembe in Limpopo. Interventions must also focus on enhancing uptake of HIV testing amongst male participants in most districts. Strategies that would improve the uptake of HIV testing include HIV self-testing and community HIV testing, specifically home-based testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine is focused on HIV/AIDS treatment, prevention and related topics relevant to clinical and public health practice. The purpose of the journal is to disseminate original research results and to support high-level learning related to HIV Medicine. It publishes original research articles, editorials, case reports/case series, reviews of state-of-the-art clinical practice, and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信