Amin Haghighat Jahromi, Matthew Zabel, Ryosuke Okamura, Carl K Hoh, Razelle Kurzrock
{"title":"循环肿瘤DNA基因组改变的变异等位基因分数(%ctDNA)与PET扫描中的SUVmax相关。","authors":"Amin Haghighat Jahromi, Matthew Zabel, Ryosuke Okamura, Carl K Hoh, Razelle Kurzrock","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between higher variant allele fraction (VAF) of genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (%ctDNA), an indicator of poor outcome, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>), the most commonly used semi-quantitative parameter in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, has not been studied. Overall, 433 cancer patients had blood-based next generation sequencing. Maximum and sum of %ctDNA alterations (%ctDNA<sub>max</sub> and %ctDNA<sub>sum</sub>, respectively) represent the maximum and sum of VAF, reported as a percentage. The subset of 46 eligible patients had treatment-naïve metastatic disease and PET/CT imaging, with median 13 days prior to ctDNA testing. We found a linear correlation between the maximum VAF (%ctDNA<sub>max</sub>) (as well as the sum of the VAFs (%ctDNA<sub>sum</sub>)) and SUV<sub>max</sub> of the most <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid lesion (r=0.43, P=0.003; r=0.43, P=0.002; respectively). Our data suggest that SUV<sub>max</sub> may be a non-invasive and readily available surrogate indicator for %ctDNA, a prognostic factor for patient survival. Since higher %ctDNA has been previously correlated with worse outcome, the relationship between SUV<sub>max</sub>, %ctDNA and survival warrants further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7572,"journal":{"name":"American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging","volume":"11 4","pages":"307-312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8414395/pdf/ajnmmi0011-0307.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variant allele fraction of genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (%ctDNA) correlates with SUV<sub>max</sub> in PET scan.\",\"authors\":\"Amin Haghighat Jahromi, Matthew Zabel, Ryosuke Okamura, Carl K Hoh, Razelle Kurzrock\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The relationship between higher variant allele fraction (VAF) of genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (%ctDNA), an indicator of poor outcome, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>), the most commonly used semi-quantitative parameter in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, has not been studied. Overall, 433 cancer patients had blood-based next generation sequencing. Maximum and sum of %ctDNA alterations (%ctDNA<sub>max</sub> and %ctDNA<sub>sum</sub>, respectively) represent the maximum and sum of VAF, reported as a percentage. The subset of 46 eligible patients had treatment-naïve metastatic disease and PET/CT imaging, with median 13 days prior to ctDNA testing. We found a linear correlation between the maximum VAF (%ctDNA<sub>max</sub>) (as well as the sum of the VAFs (%ctDNA<sub>sum</sub>)) and SUV<sub>max</sub> of the most <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-avid lesion (r=0.43, P=0.003; r=0.43, P=0.002; respectively). Our data suggest that SUV<sub>max</sub> may be a non-invasive and readily available surrogate indicator for %ctDNA, a prognostic factor for patient survival. Since higher %ctDNA has been previously correlated with worse outcome, the relationship between SUV<sub>max</sub>, %ctDNA and survival warrants further study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"307-312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8414395/pdf/ajnmmi0011-0307.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Variant allele fraction of genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (%ctDNA) correlates with SUVmax in PET scan.
The relationship between higher variant allele fraction (VAF) of genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (%ctDNA), an indicator of poor outcome, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), the most commonly used semi-quantitative parameter in 18F-FDG PET/CT, has not been studied. Overall, 433 cancer patients had blood-based next generation sequencing. Maximum and sum of %ctDNA alterations (%ctDNAmax and %ctDNAsum, respectively) represent the maximum and sum of VAF, reported as a percentage. The subset of 46 eligible patients had treatment-naïve metastatic disease and PET/CT imaging, with median 13 days prior to ctDNA testing. We found a linear correlation between the maximum VAF (%ctDNAmax) (as well as the sum of the VAFs (%ctDNAsum)) and SUVmax of the most 18F-FDG-avid lesion (r=0.43, P=0.003; r=0.43, P=0.002; respectively). Our data suggest that SUVmax may be a non-invasive and readily available surrogate indicator for %ctDNA, a prognostic factor for patient survival. Since higher %ctDNA has been previously correlated with worse outcome, the relationship between SUVmax, %ctDNA and survival warrants further study.
期刊介绍:
The scope of AJNMMI encompasses all areas of molecular imaging, including but not limited to: positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), molecular magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, optical bioluminescence, optical fluorescence, targeted ultrasound, photoacoustic imaging, etc. AJNMMI welcomes original and review articles on both clinical investigation and preclinical research. Occasionally, special topic issues, short communications, editorials, and invited perspectives will also be published. Manuscripts, including figures and tables, must be original and not under consideration by another journal.