经济评价的概念及其在甲状腺癌研究中的应用。

Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-27 DOI:10.3803/EnM.2021.1164
Kyungsik Kim, Mijin Kim, Woojin Lim, Bo Hyun Kim, Sue K Park
{"title":"经济评价的概念及其在甲状腺癌研究中的应用。","authors":"Kyungsik Kim,&nbsp;Mijin Kim,&nbsp;Woojin Lim,&nbsp;Bo Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Sue K Park","doi":"10.3803/EnM.2021.1164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Economic evaluation is a type of comparative analysis between interventions in terms of both their resource use and health outcomes. Due to the good prognosis of thyroid cancer (TC), the socioeconomic burden of TC patients post-diagnosis is increasing. Therefore, economic evaluation studies focusing on TC are recommended. This study aimed to describe the concept and methods of economic evaluation and reviewed previous TC studies. Several previous studies compared the costs of interventions or evaluated recurrence, complications, or quality of life as measures of their effectiveness. Regarding costs, most studies focused on direct costs and applied hypothetical models. Cost-minimization analysis should be distinguished from simple cost analysis. Furthermore, due to the universality of the term \"cost-effectiveness analysis\" (CEA), several studies have not distinguished CEA from cost-utility analysis; this point needs to be considered in future research. Cost-benefit analyses have not been conducted in previous TC research. Since TC has a high survival rate and good prognosis, the need for economic evaluations has recently been pointed out. Therefore, correct concepts and methods are needed to obtain clear economic evaluation results. On this basis, it will be possible to provide appropriate guidelines for TC treatment and management in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":520607,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea)","volume":" ","pages":"725-736"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/46/enm-2021-1164.PMC8419602.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Concept of Economic Evaluation and Its Application in Thyroid Cancer Research.\",\"authors\":\"Kyungsik Kim,&nbsp;Mijin Kim,&nbsp;Woojin Lim,&nbsp;Bo Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Sue K Park\",\"doi\":\"10.3803/EnM.2021.1164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Economic evaluation is a type of comparative analysis between interventions in terms of both their resource use and health outcomes. Due to the good prognosis of thyroid cancer (TC), the socioeconomic burden of TC patients post-diagnosis is increasing. Therefore, economic evaluation studies focusing on TC are recommended. This study aimed to describe the concept and methods of economic evaluation and reviewed previous TC studies. Several previous studies compared the costs of interventions or evaluated recurrence, complications, or quality of life as measures of their effectiveness. Regarding costs, most studies focused on direct costs and applied hypothetical models. Cost-minimization analysis should be distinguished from simple cost analysis. Furthermore, due to the universality of the term \\\"cost-effectiveness analysis\\\" (CEA), several studies have not distinguished CEA from cost-utility analysis; this point needs to be considered in future research. Cost-benefit analyses have not been conducted in previous TC research. Since TC has a high survival rate and good prognosis, the need for economic evaluations has recently been pointed out. Therefore, correct concepts and methods are needed to obtain clear economic evaluation results. On this basis, it will be possible to provide appropriate guidelines for TC treatment and management in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"725-736\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/46/enm-2021-1164.PMC8419602.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2021.1164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2021.1164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

经济评价是在资源利用和健康结果方面对干预措施进行比较分析的一种类型。由于甲状腺癌(TC)预后良好,TC患者诊断后的社会经济负担正在增加。因此,建议开展以TC为中心的经济评价研究。本研究旨在描述经济评价的概念和方法,并回顾以往的研究成果。先前的几项研究比较了干预措施的成本或评估了复发率、并发症或生活质量作为其有效性的衡量标准。在成本方面,大多数研究集中在直接成本上,并采用假设模型。成本最小化分析应区别于简单的成本分析。此外,由于“成本效益分析”(CEA)一词的普遍性,一些研究没有将CEA与成本效用分析区分开来;这一点需要在今后的研究中加以考虑。在以往的技术转移研究中没有进行成本效益分析。由于TC存活率高,预后好,最近指出有必要进行经济评价。因此,要获得清晰的经济评价结果,需要正确的观念和方法。在此基础上,将来有可能为TC的治疗和管理提供适当的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Concept of Economic Evaluation and Its Application in Thyroid Cancer Research.

The Concept of Economic Evaluation and Its Application in Thyroid Cancer Research.

The Concept of Economic Evaluation and Its Application in Thyroid Cancer Research.

Economic evaluation is a type of comparative analysis between interventions in terms of both their resource use and health outcomes. Due to the good prognosis of thyroid cancer (TC), the socioeconomic burden of TC patients post-diagnosis is increasing. Therefore, economic evaluation studies focusing on TC are recommended. This study aimed to describe the concept and methods of economic evaluation and reviewed previous TC studies. Several previous studies compared the costs of interventions or evaluated recurrence, complications, or quality of life as measures of their effectiveness. Regarding costs, most studies focused on direct costs and applied hypothetical models. Cost-minimization analysis should be distinguished from simple cost analysis. Furthermore, due to the universality of the term "cost-effectiveness analysis" (CEA), several studies have not distinguished CEA from cost-utility analysis; this point needs to be considered in future research. Cost-benefit analyses have not been conducted in previous TC research. Since TC has a high survival rate and good prognosis, the need for economic evaluations has recently been pointed out. Therefore, correct concepts and methods are needed to obtain clear economic evaluation results. On this basis, it will be possible to provide appropriate guidelines for TC treatment and management in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信