改善初级保健中肺癌风险评估和筛查电子健康记录中的吸烟史记录:一个案例研究

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Elizabeth Peterson , Kathryn Harris , Farhood Farjah , Nkem Akinsoto , Leah M. Marcotte
{"title":"改善初级保健中肺癌风险评估和筛查电子健康记录中的吸烟史记录:一个案例研究","authors":"Elizabeth Peterson ,&nbsp;Kathryn Harris ,&nbsp;Farhood Farjah ,&nbsp;Nkem Akinsoto ,&nbsp;Leah M. Marcotte","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Improving risk factor documentation in the electronic health record (EHR) is important in order to determine patient eligibility for lung cancer screening.</p><p>System-level prioritization combined with a clinic-level initiative can improve risk factor documentation rates.</p><p>Multi-faceted interventions that include training, process improvement, data management, and continuous performance feedback are effective and can be integrated into existing workflows.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"9 4","pages":"Article 100578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100578","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving smoking history documentation in the electronic health record for lung cancer risk assessment and screening in primary care: A case study\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Peterson ,&nbsp;Kathryn Harris ,&nbsp;Farhood Farjah ,&nbsp;Nkem Akinsoto ,&nbsp;Leah M. Marcotte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Improving risk factor documentation in the electronic health record (EHR) is important in order to determine patient eligibility for lung cancer screening.</p><p>System-level prioritization combined with a clinic-level initiative can improve risk factor documentation rates.</p><p>Multi-faceted interventions that include training, process improvement, data management, and continuous performance feedback are effective and can be integrated into existing workflows.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100578\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076421000610\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076421000610","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

改善电子健康记录(EHR)中的风险因素记录对于确定患者是否有资格进行肺癌筛查非常重要。系统级的优先级与临床级的主动性相结合可以提高风险因素的记录率。包括培训、流程改进、数据管理和持续的绩效反馈在内的多方面干预是有效的,并且可以集成到现有的工作流程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improving smoking history documentation in the electronic health record for lung cancer risk assessment and screening in primary care: A case study

Improving smoking history documentation in the electronic health record for lung cancer risk assessment and screening in primary care: A case study

Improving risk factor documentation in the electronic health record (EHR) is important in order to determine patient eligibility for lung cancer screening.

System-level prioritization combined with a clinic-level initiative can improve risk factor documentation rates.

Multi-faceted interventions that include training, process improvement, data management, and continuous performance feedback are effective and can be integrated into existing workflows.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信