重度后发性脑损伤患者视觉空间视角认知的启动效应减弱。

Alberto Costa, Umberto Bivona, Valentina Sulpizio, Raffaele Nappo, Ludovica Mastrilli, Rita Formisano, Marta Aloisi, Marianna Contrada, Carlo Caltagirone, Gaspare Galati
{"title":"重度后发性脑损伤患者视觉空间视角认知的启动效应减弱。","authors":"Alberto Costa,&nbsp;Umberto Bivona,&nbsp;Valentina Sulpizio,&nbsp;Raffaele Nappo,&nbsp;Ludovica Mastrilli,&nbsp;Rita Formisano,&nbsp;Marta Aloisi,&nbsp;Marianna Contrada,&nbsp;Carlo Caltagirone,&nbsp;Gaspare Galati","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acab069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Social cognition can be impaired after a severe acquired brain injury (sABI), but mechanisms potentially underlying these difficulties remain to be clarified. This study aimed at investigating perspective taking ability in individuals with sABI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty individuals with sABI and 20 healthy controls (HCs) have been enrolled in this case-control study. All participants were submitted to an experimental visual-spatial priming memory procedure and a self-report assessment of perspective taking (i.e., the Interpersonal Reactivity Index [IRI]). Individuals with sABI were submitted to neuropsychological tests to assess executive subcomponents, working memory, and visual attention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis on self-report scales data documents a significant between groups difference in the IRI-Fantasy subscale, with HCs showing a higher tendency to imaginatively transpose oneself into fictional situations than individuals with sABI. Analysis of performance on the experimental procedure revealed the priming effect in HCs but not in sABI individuals. Moreover, individuals with sABI performed significantly poorer than HCs on the indices of the experimental procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data preliminarily demonstrated that visual-spatial perspective taking is reduced after sABI. Findings above could give some clues for the rehabilitative intervention in sABI and suggest the possible application of the procedure here used in assessing perspective taking after sABI.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":" ","pages":"227-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduced Priming Effect for Visual-Spatial Perspective Taking in Patients With Severe Acquired Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Costa,&nbsp;Umberto Bivona,&nbsp;Valentina Sulpizio,&nbsp;Raffaele Nappo,&nbsp;Ludovica Mastrilli,&nbsp;Rita Formisano,&nbsp;Marta Aloisi,&nbsp;Marianna Contrada,&nbsp;Carlo Caltagirone,&nbsp;Gaspare Galati\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acab069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Social cognition can be impaired after a severe acquired brain injury (sABI), but mechanisms potentially underlying these difficulties remain to be clarified. This study aimed at investigating perspective taking ability in individuals with sABI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty individuals with sABI and 20 healthy controls (HCs) have been enrolled in this case-control study. All participants were submitted to an experimental visual-spatial priming memory procedure and a self-report assessment of perspective taking (i.e., the Interpersonal Reactivity Index [IRI]). Individuals with sABI were submitted to neuropsychological tests to assess executive subcomponents, working memory, and visual attention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis on self-report scales data documents a significant between groups difference in the IRI-Fantasy subscale, with HCs showing a higher tendency to imaginatively transpose oneself into fictional situations than individuals with sABI. Analysis of performance on the experimental procedure revealed the priming effect in HCs but not in sABI individuals. Moreover, individuals with sABI performed significantly poorer than HCs on the indices of the experimental procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data preliminarily demonstrated that visual-spatial perspective taking is reduced after sABI. Findings above could give some clues for the rehabilitative intervention in sABI and suggest the possible application of the procedure here used in assessing perspective taking after sABI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"227-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acab069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acab069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:重度获得性脑损伤(sABI)后社会认知功能受损,但其潜在机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨sABI患者的观点接受能力。方法:20例sABI患者和20例健康对照(hc)被纳入本病例对照研究。所有被试均进行了视觉空间启动记忆实验和视角采取的自我报告评估(即人际反应指数[IRI])。sABI患者接受了神经心理学测试,以评估执行子成分、工作记忆和视觉注意力。结果:对自我报告量表数据的分析表明,各组之间在iri -幻想分量表上存在显著差异,高智商者比重度人格障碍者更倾向于想象地将自己转换到虚构的情境中。对实验过程的性能分析显示,在hcc中有启动效应,但在sABI个体中没有。此外,sABI患者在实验过程的指标上的表现明显低于hc患者。结论:我们的数据初步证明了sABI后的视觉空间视角减少。以上研究结果可以为sABI的康复干预提供一些线索,并建议在此评估sABI后视角的应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reduced Priming Effect for Visual-Spatial Perspective Taking in Patients With Severe Acquired Brain Injury.

Objective: Social cognition can be impaired after a severe acquired brain injury (sABI), but mechanisms potentially underlying these difficulties remain to be clarified. This study aimed at investigating perspective taking ability in individuals with sABI.

Method: Twenty individuals with sABI and 20 healthy controls (HCs) have been enrolled in this case-control study. All participants were submitted to an experimental visual-spatial priming memory procedure and a self-report assessment of perspective taking (i.e., the Interpersonal Reactivity Index [IRI]). Individuals with sABI were submitted to neuropsychological tests to assess executive subcomponents, working memory, and visual attention.

Results: The analysis on self-report scales data documents a significant between groups difference in the IRI-Fantasy subscale, with HCs showing a higher tendency to imaginatively transpose oneself into fictional situations than individuals with sABI. Analysis of performance on the experimental procedure revealed the priming effect in HCs but not in sABI individuals. Moreover, individuals with sABI performed significantly poorer than HCs on the indices of the experimental procedure.

Conclusions: Our data preliminarily demonstrated that visual-spatial perspective taking is reduced after sABI. Findings above could give some clues for the rehabilitative intervention in sABI and suggest the possible application of the procedure here used in assessing perspective taking after sABI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信