男性和女性艾滋病毒感染者的认知差异:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Anna J Dreyer, Adele Munsami, Taryn Williams, Lena S Andersen, Sam Nightingale, Hetta Gouse, John Joska, Kevin G F Thomas
{"title":"男性和女性艾滋病毒感染者的认知差异:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Anna J Dreyer,&nbsp;Adele Munsami,&nbsp;Taryn Williams,&nbsp;Lena S Andersen,&nbsp;Sam Nightingale,&nbsp;Hetta Gouse,&nbsp;John Joska,&nbsp;Kevin G F Thomas","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acab068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although many studies report that women with HIV (WWH) are more vulnerable to cognitive impairment than men with HIV (MWH), this trend is not described consistently in the literature. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated whether the weight of evidence supports the existence of a significant sex difference in cognitive functioning among people with HIV and, if so, whether specific domains are affected.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic literature search retrieved 4,062 unique articles published between January 2000 and June 2019. Eligibility criteria were that studies directly compared adult WWH and MWH using a neuropsychological test battery. After extensive screening, we included 11 studies in the systematic review (N = 3,333) and 6 in the meta-analysis (N = 2,852).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies included in the systematic review found WWH performed significantly more poorly on measures of cognitive performance than MWH; the other five found no sex differences. Meta-analytic results indicated that WWH performed significantly more poorly than MWH in three cognitive domains (psychomotor coordination, visuospatial learning, and memory), but magnitudes of effect sizes were small (d = -.16, -.43, and - .30, respectively). Analyses detected no sex differences in global cognitive functioning and in the other cognitive domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sex differences in cognitive performance are small, and sociodemographic and psychiatric characteristics of WWH and MWH differ between studies. Cognitive differences between WWH and MWH may be explained by sex-based variation in these characteristics, the impact of which seems to outweigh that of HIV-related clinical variables (e.g., CD4 count and viral load).</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":" ","pages":"479-496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Differences between Men and Women with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Anna J Dreyer,&nbsp;Adele Munsami,&nbsp;Taryn Williams,&nbsp;Lena S Andersen,&nbsp;Sam Nightingale,&nbsp;Hetta Gouse,&nbsp;John Joska,&nbsp;Kevin G F Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acab068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although many studies report that women with HIV (WWH) are more vulnerable to cognitive impairment than men with HIV (MWH), this trend is not described consistently in the literature. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated whether the weight of evidence supports the existence of a significant sex difference in cognitive functioning among people with HIV and, if so, whether specific domains are affected.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic literature search retrieved 4,062 unique articles published between January 2000 and June 2019. Eligibility criteria were that studies directly compared adult WWH and MWH using a neuropsychological test battery. After extensive screening, we included 11 studies in the systematic review (N = 3,333) and 6 in the meta-analysis (N = 2,852).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies included in the systematic review found WWH performed significantly more poorly on measures of cognitive performance than MWH; the other five found no sex differences. Meta-analytic results indicated that WWH performed significantly more poorly than MWH in three cognitive domains (psychomotor coordination, visuospatial learning, and memory), but magnitudes of effect sizes were small (d = -.16, -.43, and - .30, respectively). Analyses detected no sex differences in global cognitive functioning and in the other cognitive domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sex differences in cognitive performance are small, and sociodemographic and psychiatric characteristics of WWH and MWH differ between studies. Cognitive differences between WWH and MWH may be explained by sex-based variation in these characteristics, the impact of which seems to outweigh that of HIV-related clinical variables (e.g., CD4 count and viral load).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"479-496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acab068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acab068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的:尽管许多研究报道女性HIV感染者(WWH)比男性HIV感染者(MWH)更容易发生认知障碍,但这一趋势在文献中并未得到一致的描述。在这项系统回顾和荟萃分析中,我们调查了证据的权重是否支持HIV感染者认知功能存在显著的性别差异,如果存在,是否特定领域受到影响。方法:系统检索2000年1月至2019年6月发表的4062篇文献。合格标准是研究直接比较成人WWH和MWH使用神经心理学测试电池。经过广泛筛选,我们在系统综述中纳入了11项研究(N = 3333),在meta分析中纳入了6项研究(N = 2852)。结果:系统评价中包括的六项研究发现,在认知表现的测量中,WWH的表现明显比MWH差;另外五项研究没有发现性别差异。meta分析结果显示,在三个认知领域(精神运动协调、视觉空间学习和记忆)中,WWH的表现明显差于MWH,但效应量较小(d = -)。16日-。43,和-。分别为30)。分析发现,在整体认知功能和其他认知领域中,没有性别差异。结论:认知表现的性别差异很小,研究中WWH和MWH的社会人口学和精神病学特征存在差异。WWH和MWH之间的认知差异可以通过这些特征的性别差异来解释,其影响似乎超过了与hiv相关的临床变量(例如,CD4计数和病毒载量)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive Differences between Men and Women with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: Although many studies report that women with HIV (WWH) are more vulnerable to cognitive impairment than men with HIV (MWH), this trend is not described consistently in the literature. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated whether the weight of evidence supports the existence of a significant sex difference in cognitive functioning among people with HIV and, if so, whether specific domains are affected.

Method: A systematic literature search retrieved 4,062 unique articles published between January 2000 and June 2019. Eligibility criteria were that studies directly compared adult WWH and MWH using a neuropsychological test battery. After extensive screening, we included 11 studies in the systematic review (N = 3,333) and 6 in the meta-analysis (N = 2,852).

Results: Six studies included in the systematic review found WWH performed significantly more poorly on measures of cognitive performance than MWH; the other five found no sex differences. Meta-analytic results indicated that WWH performed significantly more poorly than MWH in three cognitive domains (psychomotor coordination, visuospatial learning, and memory), but magnitudes of effect sizes were small (d = -.16, -.43, and - .30, respectively). Analyses detected no sex differences in global cognitive functioning and in the other cognitive domains.

Conclusions: Sex differences in cognitive performance are small, and sociodemographic and psychiatric characteristics of WWH and MWH differ between studies. Cognitive differences between WWH and MWH may be explained by sex-based variation in these characteristics, the impact of which seems to outweigh that of HIV-related clinical variables (e.g., CD4 count and viral load).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信