脑肿瘤患者单丸双回波动态敏感性对比MRI方案的评价。

Ashley M Stokes, Maurizio Bergamino, Lea Alhilali, Leland S Hu, John P Karis, Leslie C Baxter, Laura C Bell, C Chad Quarles
{"title":"脑肿瘤患者单丸双回波动态敏感性对比MRI方案的评价。","authors":"Ashley M Stokes,&nbsp;Maurizio Bergamino,&nbsp;Lea Alhilali,&nbsp;Leland S Hu,&nbsp;John P Karis,&nbsp;Leslie C Baxter,&nbsp;Laura C Bell,&nbsp;C Chad Quarles","doi":"10.1177/0271678X211039597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is adversely impacted by contrast agent leakage in brain tumors. Using simulations, we previously demonstrated that multi-echo DSC-MRI protocols provide improvements in contrast agent dosing, pulse sequence flexibility, and rCBV accuracy. The purpose of this study is to assess the <i>in-vivo</i> performance of dual-echo acquisitions in patients with brain tumors (n = 59). To verify pulse sequence flexibility, four single-dose dual-echo acquisitions were tested with variations in contrast agent dose, flip angle, and repetition time, and the resulting dual-echo rCBV was compared to standard single-echo rCBV obtained with preload (double-dose). Dual-echo rCBV was comparable to standard double-dose single-echo protocols (mean (standard deviation) tumor rCBV 2.17 (1.28) vs. 2.06 (1.20), respectively). High rCBV similarity was observed (CCC = 0.96), which was maintained across both flip angle (CCC = 0.98) and repetition time (CCC = 0.96) permutations, demonstrating that dual-echo acquisitions provide flexibility in acquisition parameters. Furthermore, a single dual-echo acquisition was shown to enable quantification of both perfusion and permeability metrics. In conclusion, single-dose dual-echo acquisitions provide similar rCBV to standard double-dose single-echo acquisitions, suggesting contrast agent dose can be reduced while providing significant pulse sequence flexibility and complementary tumor perfusion and permeability metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":520660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"3378-3390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8669280/pdf/10.1177_0271678X211039597.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of single bolus, dual-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocols in brain tumor patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley M Stokes,&nbsp;Maurizio Bergamino,&nbsp;Lea Alhilali,&nbsp;Leland S Hu,&nbsp;John P Karis,&nbsp;Leslie C Baxter,&nbsp;Laura C Bell,&nbsp;C Chad Quarles\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0271678X211039597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is adversely impacted by contrast agent leakage in brain tumors. Using simulations, we previously demonstrated that multi-echo DSC-MRI protocols provide improvements in contrast agent dosing, pulse sequence flexibility, and rCBV accuracy. The purpose of this study is to assess the <i>in-vivo</i> performance of dual-echo acquisitions in patients with brain tumors (n = 59). To verify pulse sequence flexibility, four single-dose dual-echo acquisitions were tested with variations in contrast agent dose, flip angle, and repetition time, and the resulting dual-echo rCBV was compared to standard single-echo rCBV obtained with preload (double-dose). Dual-echo rCBV was comparable to standard double-dose single-echo protocols (mean (standard deviation) tumor rCBV 2.17 (1.28) vs. 2.06 (1.20), respectively). High rCBV similarity was observed (CCC = 0.96), which was maintained across both flip angle (CCC = 0.98) and repetition time (CCC = 0.96) permutations, demonstrating that dual-echo acquisitions provide flexibility in acquisition parameters. Furthermore, a single dual-echo acquisition was shown to enable quantification of both perfusion and permeability metrics. In conclusion, single-dose dual-echo acquisitions provide similar rCBV to standard double-dose single-echo acquisitions, suggesting contrast agent dose can be reduced while providing significant pulse sequence flexibility and complementary tumor perfusion and permeability metrics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3378-3390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8669280/pdf/10.1177_0271678X211039597.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X211039597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X211039597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

动态敏感性对比(DSC) MRI获得的相对脑血容量(rCBV)受到脑肿瘤中造影剂泄漏的不利影响。通过模拟,我们之前证明了多回声DSC-MRI方案在造影剂剂量、脉冲序列灵活性和rCBV准确性方面提供了改进。本研究的目的是评估双回波采集在脑肿瘤患者体内的表现(n = 59)。为了验证脉冲序列的灵活性,在造影剂剂量、翻转角度和重复时间的变化下,对四种单剂量双回波采集进行了测试,并将得到的双回波rCBV与预加载(双剂量)获得的标准单回波rCBV进行了比较。双回波rCBV与标准双剂量单回波方案相当(平均(标准偏差)肿瘤rCBV分别为2.17(1.28)和2.06(1.20))。高rCBV相似性(CCC = 0.96)在翻转角度(CCC = 0.98)和重复时间(CCC = 0.96)排列中均保持不变,表明双回声获取在获取参数上具有灵活性。此外,单双回波采集被证明能够量化灌注和渗透率指标。综上所述,单剂量双回波成像提供的rCBV与标准双剂量单回波成像相似,表明造影剂剂量可以降低,同时提供显著的脉冲序列灵活性和互补的肿瘤灌注和通透性指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of single bolus, dual-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocols in brain tumor patients.

Evaluation of single bolus, dual-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocols in brain tumor patients.

Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is adversely impacted by contrast agent leakage in brain tumors. Using simulations, we previously demonstrated that multi-echo DSC-MRI protocols provide improvements in contrast agent dosing, pulse sequence flexibility, and rCBV accuracy. The purpose of this study is to assess the in-vivo performance of dual-echo acquisitions in patients with brain tumors (n = 59). To verify pulse sequence flexibility, four single-dose dual-echo acquisitions were tested with variations in contrast agent dose, flip angle, and repetition time, and the resulting dual-echo rCBV was compared to standard single-echo rCBV obtained with preload (double-dose). Dual-echo rCBV was comparable to standard double-dose single-echo protocols (mean (standard deviation) tumor rCBV 2.17 (1.28) vs. 2.06 (1.20), respectively). High rCBV similarity was observed (CCC = 0.96), which was maintained across both flip angle (CCC = 0.98) and repetition time (CCC = 0.96) permutations, demonstrating that dual-echo acquisitions provide flexibility in acquisition parameters. Furthermore, a single dual-echo acquisition was shown to enable quantification of both perfusion and permeability metrics. In conclusion, single-dose dual-echo acquisitions provide similar rCBV to standard double-dose single-echo acquisitions, suggesting contrast agent dose can be reduced while providing significant pulse sequence flexibility and complementary tumor perfusion and permeability metrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信