MR灌注评价机械性血栓切除术的可行性。

Q2 Medicine
Varsha Muddasani, Adam de Havenon, J Scott McNally, Hediyeh Baradaran, Matthew D Alexander
{"title":"MR灌注评价机械性血栓切除术的可行性。","authors":"Varsha Muddasani, Adam de Havenon, J Scott McNally, Hediyeh Baradaran, Matthew D Alexander","doi":"10.1097/RMR.0000000000000277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality, and the incidence of ischemic stroke is projected to continue to rise in coming decades. These projections emphasize the need for improved imaging techniques for accurate diagnosis allowing effective treatments for ischemic stroke. Ischemic stroke is commonly evaluated with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Noncontrast CT is typically used within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to identify candidates for thrombolysis. Beyond this time window, thrombolytic therapy may lead to poor outcomes if patients are not optimally selected using appropriate imaging. MRI provides an accurate method for the earliest identification of core infarct, and MR perfusion can identify salvageable hypoperfused penumbra. The prognostic value for a better outcome in these patients lies in the ability to distinguish between core infarct and salvageable brain at risk-the ischemic penumbra-which is a function of the degree of ischemia and time. Many centers underutilize MRI for acute evaluation of ischemic stroke. This review will illustrate how perfusion-diffusion mismatch calculated from diffusion-weighted MRI and MR perfusion is a reliable approach for patient selection for stroke therapy and can be performed in timeframes that are comparable to CT-based algorithms while providing potentially superior diagnostic information.</p>","PeriodicalId":39381,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":"30 4","pages":"197-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371677/pdf/nihms-1671477.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MR Perfusion in the Evaluation of Mechanical Thrombectomy Candidacy.\",\"authors\":\"Varsha Muddasani, Adam de Havenon, J Scott McNally, Hediyeh Baradaran, Matthew D Alexander\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RMR.0000000000000277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality, and the incidence of ischemic stroke is projected to continue to rise in coming decades. These projections emphasize the need for improved imaging techniques for accurate diagnosis allowing effective treatments for ischemic stroke. Ischemic stroke is commonly evaluated with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Noncontrast CT is typically used within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to identify candidates for thrombolysis. Beyond this time window, thrombolytic therapy may lead to poor outcomes if patients are not optimally selected using appropriate imaging. MRI provides an accurate method for the earliest identification of core infarct, and MR perfusion can identify salvageable hypoperfused penumbra. The prognostic value for a better outcome in these patients lies in the ability to distinguish between core infarct and salvageable brain at risk-the ischemic penumbra-which is a function of the degree of ischemia and time. Many centers underutilize MRI for acute evaluation of ischemic stroke. This review will illustrate how perfusion-diffusion mismatch calculated from diffusion-weighted MRI and MR perfusion is a reliable approach for patient selection for stroke therapy and can be performed in timeframes that are comparable to CT-based algorithms while providing potentially superior diagnostic information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"197-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371677/pdf/nihms-1671477.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:中风是导致残疾和死亡的主要原因,缺血性中风的发病率预计在未来几十年将继续上升。这些预测强调了对改进成像技术的需求,以实现准确诊断,从而对缺血性中风进行有效治疗。缺血性中风通常通过计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)进行评估。非集中CT通常在4.5范围内使用 症状出现的小时数,以确定溶栓的候选者。超过这个时间窗口,如果没有使用适当的成像对患者进行最佳选择,溶栓治疗可能会导致不良结果。MRI为最早识别核心梗死提供了一种准确的方法,MR灌注可以识别可挽救的低灌注半影。这些患者获得更好结果的预后价值在于能够区分核心梗死和处于危险中的可挽救大脑——缺血半暗带,这是缺血程度和时间的函数。许多中心未充分利用MRI对缺血性卒中的急性评估。这篇综述将说明根据扩散加权MRI和MR灌注计算的灌注-扩散失配如何成为中风治疗患者选择的可靠方法,并且可以在与基于CT的算法相当的时间范围内进行,同时提供潜在的优越诊断信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

MR Perfusion in the Evaluation of Mechanical Thrombectomy Candidacy.

MR Perfusion in the Evaluation of Mechanical Thrombectomy Candidacy.

MR Perfusion in the Evaluation of Mechanical Thrombectomy Candidacy.

Abstract: Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality, and the incidence of ischemic stroke is projected to continue to rise in coming decades. These projections emphasize the need for improved imaging techniques for accurate diagnosis allowing effective treatments for ischemic stroke. Ischemic stroke is commonly evaluated with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Noncontrast CT is typically used within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to identify candidates for thrombolysis. Beyond this time window, thrombolytic therapy may lead to poor outcomes if patients are not optimally selected using appropriate imaging. MRI provides an accurate method for the earliest identification of core infarct, and MR perfusion can identify salvageable hypoperfused penumbra. The prognostic value for a better outcome in these patients lies in the ability to distinguish between core infarct and salvageable brain at risk-the ischemic penumbra-which is a function of the degree of ischemia and time. Many centers underutilize MRI for acute evaluation of ischemic stroke. This review will illustrate how perfusion-diffusion mismatch calculated from diffusion-weighted MRI and MR perfusion is a reliable approach for patient selection for stroke therapy and can be performed in timeframes that are comparable to CT-based algorithms while providing potentially superior diagnostic information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a leading information resource for professionals in the MRI community. This publication supplies authoritative, up-to-the-minute coverage of technical advances in this evolving field as well as practical, hands-on guidance from leading experts. Six times a year, TMRI focuses on a single timely topic of interest to radiologists. These topical issues present a variety of perspectives from top radiological authorities to provide an in-depth understanding of how MRI is being used in each area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信