COVID-19大流行期间一线急诊科工作人员的领导沟通、压力和倦怠:混合方法方法

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Rohit B. Sangal MD, MBA , Alexandra Bray , Eleanor Reid MD , Andrew Ulrich MD , Beth Liebhardt RN, MSN , Arjun K. Venkatesh MD, MBA, MHS , Marissa King PhD
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间一线急诊科工作人员的领导沟通、压力和倦怠:混合方法方法","authors":"Rohit B. Sangal MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Alexandra Bray ,&nbsp;Eleanor Reid MD ,&nbsp;Andrew Ulrich MD ,&nbsp;Beth Liebhardt RN, MSN ,&nbsp;Arjun K. Venkatesh MD, MBA, MHS ,&nbsp;Marissa King PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Organizations have a key role to play in supporting healthcare workers (HCWs) and mitigating stress during COVID-19. We aimed to understand whether perceptions of support and communication by local leadership were associated with reduced reports of stress and burnout among frontline HCWs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted cross-sectional surveys embedded within emergency department (ED) workflow during the first wave of COVID-19 from April 9, 2020 to June 15th, 2020 within three EDs of a multisite health system in the Northeast United States. All ED HCWs were administered electronic surveys during shift via text message. We simultaneously conducted 64 qualitative interviews to better characterize and validate survey responses. Primary survey outcomes were levels of work stress and burnout.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Over 10 week study, 327 of 431 (76%) frontline HCWs responded to at least one round of the survey. More useful communication mediated through higher perception of support was significantly associated with lower work stress (<em>B</em> = −0.33, p &lt; 0.001) and burnout (<em>B</em> = −7.84, p &lt; 0.001). A one-point increase on the communication Likert scale was associated with a 9% reduction in stress and a 19% reduction in burnout. Three themes related to effective crisis communication during COVID-19 emerged in interviews: (1) information consolidation prior to dissemination, (2) consistency of communication, and (3) bi-directional communication.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This work suggests that effective local leadership communication, characterized by information consolidation, consistency, and bi-directionality, leads to higher perceptions of support and lower stress and burnout among ED frontline workers. As the pandemic continues, these results present an evidence-based framework for leaders to support frontline HCWs through effective crisis communication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"9 4","pages":"Article 100577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100577","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leadership communication, stress, and burnout among frontline emergency department staff amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods approach\",\"authors\":\"Rohit B. Sangal MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Alexandra Bray ,&nbsp;Eleanor Reid MD ,&nbsp;Andrew Ulrich MD ,&nbsp;Beth Liebhardt RN, MSN ,&nbsp;Arjun K. Venkatesh MD, MBA, MHS ,&nbsp;Marissa King PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Organizations have a key role to play in supporting healthcare workers (HCWs) and mitigating stress during COVID-19. We aimed to understand whether perceptions of support and communication by local leadership were associated with reduced reports of stress and burnout among frontline HCWs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted cross-sectional surveys embedded within emergency department (ED) workflow during the first wave of COVID-19 from April 9, 2020 to June 15th, 2020 within three EDs of a multisite health system in the Northeast United States. All ED HCWs were administered electronic surveys during shift via text message. We simultaneously conducted 64 qualitative interviews to better characterize and validate survey responses. Primary survey outcomes were levels of work stress and burnout.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Over 10 week study, 327 of 431 (76%) frontline HCWs responded to at least one round of the survey. More useful communication mediated through higher perception of support was significantly associated with lower work stress (<em>B</em> = −0.33, p &lt; 0.001) and burnout (<em>B</em> = −7.84, p &lt; 0.001). A one-point increase on the communication Likert scale was associated with a 9% reduction in stress and a 19% reduction in burnout. Three themes related to effective crisis communication during COVID-19 emerged in interviews: (1) information consolidation prior to dissemination, (2) consistency of communication, and (3) bi-directional communication.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This work suggests that effective local leadership communication, characterized by information consolidation, consistency, and bi-directionality, leads to higher perceptions of support and lower stress and burnout among ED frontline workers. As the pandemic continues, these results present an evidence-based framework for leaders to support frontline HCWs through effective crisis communication.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100577\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076421000609\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076421000609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

在COVID-19期间,组织在支持医护人员和减轻压力方面可以发挥关键作用。我们的目的是了解当地领导对支持和沟通的看法是否与一线医护人员的压力和倦怠报告的减少有关。方法:我们在美国东北部一个多站点卫生系统的三个急诊科(ED)中,对2020年4月9日至2020年6月15日第一波COVID-19期间的急诊科(ED)工作流程进行了横断面调查。所有ED卫生保健员在轮班期间通过短信进行电子调查。我们同时进行了64次定性访谈,以更好地描述和验证调查结果。主要调查结果是工作压力和倦怠水平。结果在为期10周的研究中,431名一线医护人员中有327名(76%)至少回答了一轮调查。通过更高的支持感知介导的更有用的沟通与更低的工作压力显著相关(B = - 0.33, p <0.001)和倦怠(B = - 7.84, p <0.001)。沟通李克特量表每增加1分,压力就会减少9%,倦怠感就会减少19%。在采访中,我们发现了三个与COVID-19期间有效危机沟通相关的主题:(1)传播前的信息整合;(2)沟通的一致性;(3)双向沟通。结论有效的地方领导沟通,以信息整合、一致性和双向性为特征,可以提高ED一线员工的支持感,降低压力和倦怠感。随着大流行的持续,这些结果为领导人提供了一个基于证据的框架,可通过有效的危机沟通支持一线卫生保健工作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Leadership communication, stress, and burnout among frontline emergency department staff amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods approach

Leadership communication, stress, and burnout among frontline emergency department staff amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods approach

Leadership communication, stress, and burnout among frontline emergency department staff amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods approach

Background

Organizations have a key role to play in supporting healthcare workers (HCWs) and mitigating stress during COVID-19. We aimed to understand whether perceptions of support and communication by local leadership were associated with reduced reports of stress and burnout among frontline HCWs.

Methods

We conducted cross-sectional surveys embedded within emergency department (ED) workflow during the first wave of COVID-19 from April 9, 2020 to June 15th, 2020 within three EDs of a multisite health system in the Northeast United States. All ED HCWs were administered electronic surveys during shift via text message. We simultaneously conducted 64 qualitative interviews to better characterize and validate survey responses. Primary survey outcomes were levels of work stress and burnout.

Results

Over 10 week study, 327 of 431 (76%) frontline HCWs responded to at least one round of the survey. More useful communication mediated through higher perception of support was significantly associated with lower work stress (B = −0.33, p < 0.001) and burnout (B = −7.84, p < 0.001). A one-point increase on the communication Likert scale was associated with a 9% reduction in stress and a 19% reduction in burnout. Three themes related to effective crisis communication during COVID-19 emerged in interviews: (1) information consolidation prior to dissemination, (2) consistency of communication, and (3) bi-directional communication.

Conclusion

This work suggests that effective local leadership communication, characterized by information consolidation, consistency, and bi-directionality, leads to higher perceptions of support and lower stress and burnout among ED frontline workers. As the pandemic continues, these results present an evidence-based framework for leaders to support frontline HCWs through effective crisis communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信