结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术:最佳实践的更新。

IF 2.5 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2021-08-03 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEG.S249869
Tara Keihanian, Mohamed O Othman
{"title":"结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术:最佳实践的更新。","authors":"Tara Keihanian, Mohamed O Othman","doi":"10.2147/CEG.S249869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a method of en-bloc resection of neoplastic colorectal lesions which is less invasive compared to surgical resection. Lesion stratification, architecture recognition and estimation of depth of invasion are crucial for patient selection. Expert endoscopists have integrated a variety of classification systems including Paris, lateral spreading tumor (LST), narrow band imaging (NBI), international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) and Japanese NBI expert team (JNET) in their day-to-day practice to enhance lesion detection accuracy. Major societies recommend ESD for LST-non granular (NG), Kudo-VI type, large depressed and protruded colonic lesions with shallow submucosal invasion. Chance of submucosal invasion enhances with increased depth as well as tumor location and size. In comparison to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), ESD has a lowerl recurrence rate and higher curative resection rate, making it superior for larger colonic lesions management. Major complications such as bleeding and perforation could be seen in up to 11% and 16% of patients, respectively. In major Western countries, performing ESD is challenging due to limited number of expert providers, lack of insurance coverage, and unique patient characteristics such as higher BMI and higher percentage of previously manipulated lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10208,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology","volume":"14 ","pages":"317-330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/e4/ceg-14-317.PMC8349195.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An Update on Best Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Tara Keihanian, Mohamed O Othman\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CEG.S249869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a method of en-bloc resection of neoplastic colorectal lesions which is less invasive compared to surgical resection. Lesion stratification, architecture recognition and estimation of depth of invasion are crucial for patient selection. Expert endoscopists have integrated a variety of classification systems including Paris, lateral spreading tumor (LST), narrow band imaging (NBI), international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) and Japanese NBI expert team (JNET) in their day-to-day practice to enhance lesion detection accuracy. Major societies recommend ESD for LST-non granular (NG), Kudo-VI type, large depressed and protruded colonic lesions with shallow submucosal invasion. Chance of submucosal invasion enhances with increased depth as well as tumor location and size. In comparison to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), ESD has a lowerl recurrence rate and higher curative resection rate, making it superior for larger colonic lesions management. Major complications such as bleeding and perforation could be seen in up to 11% and 16% of patients, respectively. In major Western countries, performing ESD is challenging due to limited number of expert providers, lack of insurance coverage, and unique patient characteristics such as higher BMI and higher percentage of previously manipulated lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"317-330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/e4/ceg-14-317.PMC8349195.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S249869\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S249869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)是一种对结肠直肠肿瘤病变进行全切的方法,与手术切除相比创伤更小。病变分层、结构识别和侵袭深度评估对患者的选择至关重要。内镜专家在日常实践中整合了多种分类系统,包括巴黎系统、侧蔓延肿瘤(LST)、窄带成像(NBI)、国际结直肠内镜(NICE)和日本 NBI 专家小组(JNET),以提高病变检测的准确性。主要学会建议对 LST-非颗粒(NG)、Kudo-VI 型、大的凹陷和突出结肠病变且粘膜下侵犯较浅的患者进行 ESD。随着肿瘤深度、位置和大小的增加,粘膜下侵犯的几率也会增加。与内镜粘膜切除术(EMR)相比,ESD 的复发率较低,治愈切除率较高,因此在处理较大的结肠病变时更具优势。出血和穿孔等主要并发症的发生率分别高达 11% 和 16%。在主要西方国家,由于专家提供者数量有限、缺乏保险以及患者的特殊性(如较高的体重指数和较高的既往病变比例),ESD 的实施具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An Update on Best Practice.

Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An Update on Best Practice.

Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An Update on Best Practice.

Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An Update on Best Practice.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a method of en-bloc resection of neoplastic colorectal lesions which is less invasive compared to surgical resection. Lesion stratification, architecture recognition and estimation of depth of invasion are crucial for patient selection. Expert endoscopists have integrated a variety of classification systems including Paris, lateral spreading tumor (LST), narrow band imaging (NBI), international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) and Japanese NBI expert team (JNET) in their day-to-day practice to enhance lesion detection accuracy. Major societies recommend ESD for LST-non granular (NG), Kudo-VI type, large depressed and protruded colonic lesions with shallow submucosal invasion. Chance of submucosal invasion enhances with increased depth as well as tumor location and size. In comparison to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), ESD has a lowerl recurrence rate and higher curative resection rate, making it superior for larger colonic lesions management. Major complications such as bleeding and perforation could be seen in up to 11% and 16% of patients, respectively. In major Western countries, performing ESD is challenging due to limited number of expert providers, lack of insurance coverage, and unique patient characteristics such as higher BMI and higher percentage of previously manipulated lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信