中度加速主动脉狭窄患者重建多层相衬MR图像中血流动力学流线静脉收缩有效孔口面积的估算。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-30 DOI:10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0001
Yu Hohri, Keiichi Itatani, Akiko Matsuo, Yoshiaki Komori, Takeshi Okamoto, Tomoyuki Goto, Takuma Kobayashi, Takeshi Hiramatsu, Shohei Miyazaki, Teruyasu Nishino, Hitoshi Yaku
{"title":"中度加速主动脉狭窄患者重建多层相衬MR图像中血流动力学流线静脉收缩有效孔口面积的估算。","authors":"Yu Hohri,&nbsp;Keiichi Itatani,&nbsp;Akiko Matsuo,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Komori,&nbsp;Takeshi Okamoto,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Goto,&nbsp;Takuma Kobayashi,&nbsp;Takeshi Hiramatsu,&nbsp;Shohei Miyazaki,&nbsp;Teruyasu Nishino,&nbsp;Hitoshi Yaku","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In aortic stenosis (AS), the discrepancy between moderately accelerated flow and effective orifice area (EOA) continues to pose a challenge. We developed a method of measuring the vena contracta area as hemodynamic EOA using cardiac MRI focusing on AS patients with a moderately accelerated flow to solve the problem that AS severity can currently be determined only by echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated 40 patients with a peak transvalvular velocity > 3.0 m/s on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The patients were divided into highly accelerated and moderately accelerated AS groups according to whether or not the peak transvalvular velocity was ≥ 4.0 m/s. From the multislice 2D cine phase-contrast MRI data, the cross-sectional area of the vena contracta of the reconstructed streamline in the Valsalva sinus was defined as MRI-EOAs. Patient symptoms and echocardiography data, including EOA (defined as TTE-EOA), were derived from the continuity equation using TTE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants in the highly accelerated AS group (n = 19) showed a peak velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s in MRI. Eleven patients in the moderately accelerated AS group (n = 21) had a TTE-EOA < 1.00 cm<sup>2</sup>. In the moderately accelerated AS group, MRI-EOAs demonstrated a strong correlation with TTE-EOAs (r = 0.76, P < 0.01). Meanwhile, in the highly accelerated AS group, MRI-EOAs demonstrated positivity but a moderate correlation with TTE-EOAs (r = 0.63, P = 0.004). MRI-EOAs were overestimated compared to TTE-EOAs. In terms of the moderately accelerated AS group, the best cut-off value for MRI-EOAs was < 1.23 cm<sup>2</sup>, compatible with TTE-EOAs < 1.00 cm<sup>2</sup>, with an excellent prediction of the New York Heart Association classification ≥ III (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 76.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI-EOAs may be an alternative to conventional echocardiography for patients with moderately accelerated AS, especially those with discordant echocardiographic parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":18119,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/13/14/mrms-21-569.PMC9618929.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the Haemodynamic Streamline Vena Contracta as the Effective Orifice Area Measured from Reconstructed Multislice Phase-contrast MR Images for Patients with Moderately Accelerated Aortic Stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Hohri,&nbsp;Keiichi Itatani,&nbsp;Akiko Matsuo,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Komori,&nbsp;Takeshi Okamoto,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Goto,&nbsp;Takuma Kobayashi,&nbsp;Takeshi Hiramatsu,&nbsp;Shohei Miyazaki,&nbsp;Teruyasu Nishino,&nbsp;Hitoshi Yaku\",\"doi\":\"10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In aortic stenosis (AS), the discrepancy between moderately accelerated flow and effective orifice area (EOA) continues to pose a challenge. We developed a method of measuring the vena contracta area as hemodynamic EOA using cardiac MRI focusing on AS patients with a moderately accelerated flow to solve the problem that AS severity can currently be determined only by echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated 40 patients with a peak transvalvular velocity > 3.0 m/s on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The patients were divided into highly accelerated and moderately accelerated AS groups according to whether or not the peak transvalvular velocity was ≥ 4.0 m/s. From the multislice 2D cine phase-contrast MRI data, the cross-sectional area of the vena contracta of the reconstructed streamline in the Valsalva sinus was defined as MRI-EOAs. Patient symptoms and echocardiography data, including EOA (defined as TTE-EOA), were derived from the continuity equation using TTE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants in the highly accelerated AS group (n = 19) showed a peak velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s in MRI. Eleven patients in the moderately accelerated AS group (n = 21) had a TTE-EOA < 1.00 cm<sup>2</sup>. In the moderately accelerated AS group, MRI-EOAs demonstrated a strong correlation with TTE-EOAs (r = 0.76, P < 0.01). Meanwhile, in the highly accelerated AS group, MRI-EOAs demonstrated positivity but a moderate correlation with TTE-EOAs (r = 0.63, P = 0.004). MRI-EOAs were overestimated compared to TTE-EOAs. In terms of the moderately accelerated AS group, the best cut-off value for MRI-EOAs was < 1.23 cm<sup>2</sup>, compatible with TTE-EOAs < 1.00 cm<sup>2</sup>, with an excellent prediction of the New York Heart Association classification ≥ III (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 76.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI-EOAs may be an alternative to conventional echocardiography for patients with moderately accelerated AS, especially those with discordant echocardiographic parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/13/14/mrms-21-569.PMC9618929.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在主动脉狭窄(AS)中,适度加速血流与有效孔口面积(EOA)之间的差异仍然是一个挑战。我们开发了一种测量静脉收缩面积作为血流动力学EOA的方法,使用心脏MRI聚焦于中度血流加速的as患者,以解决目前只能通过超声心动图确定as严重程度的问题。方法:对40例经胸超声心动图(TTE)峰值经瓣速度> 3.0 m/s的患者进行研究。根据经瓣速度峰值是否≥4.0 m/s分为高加速组和中加速组。从多层2D电影相对比MRI数据中,将Valsalva窦重构流线收缩静脉的横截面积定义为MRI- eoa。患者症状和超声心动图数据,包括EOA(定义为te -EOA),由使用TTE的连续性方程导出。结果:高加速AS组(n = 19) MRI峰值速度均≥4.0 m/s。中度加速AS组11例患者(n = 21) te - eoa < 1.00 cm2。中度加速AS组MRI-EOAs与te - eoas相关性较强(r = 0.76, P < 0.01)。高加速AS组MRI-EOAs呈阳性,但与te - eoas呈正相关(r = 0.63, P = 0.004)。与te - eoas相比,MRI-EOAs被高估。中度加速AS组MRI-EOAs的最佳临界值< 1.23 cm2,与te - eoas < 1.00 cm2相一致,对纽约心脏协会分级≥III的预测效果良好(敏感性87.5%,特异性76.9%)。结论:对于中度加速AS患者,尤其是超声心动图参数不一致的患者,MRI-EOAs可能是常规超声心动图的替代选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimating the Haemodynamic Streamline Vena Contracta as the Effective Orifice Area Measured from Reconstructed Multislice Phase-contrast MR Images for Patients with Moderately Accelerated Aortic Stenosis.

Purpose: In aortic stenosis (AS), the discrepancy between moderately accelerated flow and effective orifice area (EOA) continues to pose a challenge. We developed a method of measuring the vena contracta area as hemodynamic EOA using cardiac MRI focusing on AS patients with a moderately accelerated flow to solve the problem that AS severity can currently be determined only by echocardiography.

Methods: We investigated 40 patients with a peak transvalvular velocity > 3.0 m/s on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The patients were divided into highly accelerated and moderately accelerated AS groups according to whether or not the peak transvalvular velocity was ≥ 4.0 m/s. From the multislice 2D cine phase-contrast MRI data, the cross-sectional area of the vena contracta of the reconstructed streamline in the Valsalva sinus was defined as MRI-EOAs. Patient symptoms and echocardiography data, including EOA (defined as TTE-EOA), were derived from the continuity equation using TTE.

Results: All participants in the highly accelerated AS group (n = 19) showed a peak velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s in MRI. Eleven patients in the moderately accelerated AS group (n = 21) had a TTE-EOA < 1.00 cm2. In the moderately accelerated AS group, MRI-EOAs demonstrated a strong correlation with TTE-EOAs (r = 0.76, P < 0.01). Meanwhile, in the highly accelerated AS group, MRI-EOAs demonstrated positivity but a moderate correlation with TTE-EOAs (r = 0.63, P = 0.004). MRI-EOAs were overestimated compared to TTE-EOAs. In terms of the moderately accelerated AS group, the best cut-off value for MRI-EOAs was < 1.23 cm2, compatible with TTE-EOAs < 1.00 cm2, with an excellent prediction of the New York Heart Association classification ≥ III (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 76.9%).

Conclusion: MRI-EOAs may be an alternative to conventional echocardiography for patients with moderately accelerated AS, especially those with discordant echocardiographic parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences (MRMS or Magn Reson Med Sci) is an international journal pursuing the publication of original articles contributing to the progress of magnetic resonance in the field of biomedical sciences including technical developments and clinical applications. MRMS is an official journal of the Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (JSMRM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信