埃塞俄比亚西北部贡达尔大学屈光不正患者的立体视力。

IF 1.4 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Clinical Optometry Pub Date : 2021-07-23 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTO.S320043
Mikias Mered Tilahun, Mohammed Seid Hussen, Getasew Alemu Mersha, Biruk Lelisa Eticha
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚西北部贡达尔大学屈光不正患者的立体视力。","authors":"Mikias Mered Tilahun,&nbsp;Mohammed Seid Hussen,&nbsp;Getasew Alemu Mersha,&nbsp;Biruk Lelisa Eticha","doi":"10.2147/OPTO.S320043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the level of stereopsis, proportion of poor stereopsis, and factors influencing stereopsis in adults with refractive error.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted on 153 adults with refractive error at Gondar University Hospital Tertiary Eye Care Center from April 08 to June 07, 2019. Structured questionnaires and ophthalmic instruments (Retinoscope, Worth Four Dot test and TNO Stereo plates) were used to collect the data. Data were entered and analyzed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. The result was summarized using summary statistics such as mean. Chi-squared test of association was applied between stereopsis and independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The level of stereopsis after correction of refractive error ranged from 1.89 to 2.65 log arc second. Before correction of refractive error, poor stereopsis was observed in 46.4% of the participants, while after correction, it dropped to 39.8% (CI: 95%: 31.1%-47.8%). Stereopsis after correction had a significant association with age, best visual acuity, type of refractive error, and fusional status at distance with a p value < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given refractive error corrected, the mean stereopsis in patients with refractive error was 2.42 log arc second. Proportion of poor stereopsis was noted in 39.8% of the participants corrected for refractive error. Age, best corrected visual acuity, type of refractive error, and fusional status had a significant association with stereopsis. Further studies on stereoacuity on a large scale are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":43701,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Optometry","volume":"13 ","pages":"221-226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/21/opto-13-221.PMC8315773.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereoacuity Among Patients with Refractive Error at University of Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Mikias Mered Tilahun,&nbsp;Mohammed Seid Hussen,&nbsp;Getasew Alemu Mersha,&nbsp;Biruk Lelisa Eticha\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTO.S320043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the level of stereopsis, proportion of poor stereopsis, and factors influencing stereopsis in adults with refractive error.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted on 153 adults with refractive error at Gondar University Hospital Tertiary Eye Care Center from April 08 to June 07, 2019. Structured questionnaires and ophthalmic instruments (Retinoscope, Worth Four Dot test and TNO Stereo plates) were used to collect the data. Data were entered and analyzed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. The result was summarized using summary statistics such as mean. Chi-squared test of association was applied between stereopsis and independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The level of stereopsis after correction of refractive error ranged from 1.89 to 2.65 log arc second. Before correction of refractive error, poor stereopsis was observed in 46.4% of the participants, while after correction, it dropped to 39.8% (CI: 95%: 31.1%-47.8%). Stereopsis after correction had a significant association with age, best visual acuity, type of refractive error, and fusional status at distance with a p value < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given refractive error corrected, the mean stereopsis in patients with refractive error was 2.42 log arc second. Proportion of poor stereopsis was noted in 39.8% of the participants corrected for refractive error. Age, best corrected visual acuity, type of refractive error, and fusional status had a significant association with stereopsis. Further studies on stereoacuity on a large scale are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Optometry\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"221-226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/21/opto-13-221.PMC8315773.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S320043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S320043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估成人屈光不正患者的立体视觉水平、不良立体视觉比例以及影响立体视觉的因素。方法:这是一项横断面描述性研究,于2019年4月8日至6月7日在贡达尔大学医院三级眼科护理中心对153名屈光不正成人进行了研究。采用结构化问卷调查和眼科仪器(视网膜镜、沃斯四点检验和TNO立体板)收集数据。数据输入和分析与社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)版本20。采用均值等汇总统计方法对结果进行汇总。立体视觉与自变量之间采用卡方相关性检验。结果:屈光不正矫正后立体视觉水平为1.89 ~ 2.65对数弧秒。屈光不正矫正前,有46.4%的受试者立体视觉不佳,矫正后降至39.8% (CI: 95%: 31.1%-47.8%)。矫正后立体视与年龄、最佳视力、屈光不正类型、远处融合状态有显著相关性,p值< 0.05。结论:在矫正屈光不正的情况下,屈光不正患者的平均立体视觉为2.42对数弧秒。矫正屈光不正的参与者中有39.8%出现立体视觉不良。年龄、最佳矫正视力、屈光不正类型和融合状态与立体视觉有显著相关性。建议进一步开展大尺度立体视敏度的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Stereoacuity Among Patients with Refractive Error at University of Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia.

Stereoacuity Among Patients with Refractive Error at University of Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the level of stereopsis, proportion of poor stereopsis, and factors influencing stereopsis in adults with refractive error.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted on 153 adults with refractive error at Gondar University Hospital Tertiary Eye Care Center from April 08 to June 07, 2019. Structured questionnaires and ophthalmic instruments (Retinoscope, Worth Four Dot test and TNO Stereo plates) were used to collect the data. Data were entered and analyzed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. The result was summarized using summary statistics such as mean. Chi-squared test of association was applied between stereopsis and independent variables.

Results: The level of stereopsis after correction of refractive error ranged from 1.89 to 2.65 log arc second. Before correction of refractive error, poor stereopsis was observed in 46.4% of the participants, while after correction, it dropped to 39.8% (CI: 95%: 31.1%-47.8%). Stereopsis after correction had a significant association with age, best visual acuity, type of refractive error, and fusional status at distance with a p value < 0.05.

Conclusion: Given refractive error corrected, the mean stereopsis in patients with refractive error was 2.42 log arc second. Proportion of poor stereopsis was noted in 39.8% of the participants corrected for refractive error. Age, best corrected visual acuity, type of refractive error, and fusional status had a significant association with stereopsis. Further studies on stereoacuity on a large scale are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Optometry
Clinical Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Optometry is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on clinical optometry. All aspects of patient care are addressed within the journal as well as the practice of optometry including economic and business analyses. Basic and clinical research papers are published that cover all aspects of optics, refraction and its application to the theory and practice of optometry. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Theoretical and applied optics, Delivery of patient care in optometry practice, Refraction and correction of errors, Screening and preventative aspects of eye disease, Extended clinical roles for optometrists including shared care and provision of medications, Teaching and training optometrists, International aspects of optometry, Business practice, Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, Health economic evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信