或多或少我和你:自我关联增强了项目概率对刺激优先级的影响。

Psychological Research Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-29 DOI:10.1007/s00426-021-01562-x
Saga L Svensson, Marius Golubickis, Hollie Maclean, Johanna K Falbén, Linn M Persson, Dimitra Tsamadi, Siobhan Caughey, Arash Sahraie, C Neil Macrae
{"title":"或多或少我和你:自我关联增强了项目概率对刺激优先级的影响。","authors":"Saga L Svensson,&nbsp;Marius Golubickis,&nbsp;Hollie Maclean,&nbsp;Johanna K Falbén,&nbsp;Linn M Persson,&nbsp;Dimitra Tsamadi,&nbsp;Siobhan Caughey,&nbsp;Arash Sahraie,&nbsp;C Neil Macrae","doi":"10.1007/s00426-021-01562-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-relevance exerts a powerful influence on information processing. Compared to material associated with other people, personally meaningful stimuli are prioritized during decision-making. Further exploring the character of this effect, here we considered the extent to which stimulus enhancement is impacted by the frequency of self-relevant versus friend-relevant material. In a matching task, participants reported whether shape-label stimulus pairs corresponded to previously learned associations (e.g., triangle = self, square = friend). Crucially however, before the task commenced, stimulus-based expectancies were provided indicating the probability with which both self- and friend-related shapes would be encountered. The results revealed that task performance was impacted by the frequency of stimulus presentation in combination with the personal relevance of the items. When self- and friend-related shapes appeared with equal frequencies, a self-prioritization effect emerged (Expt. 1). Additionally, in both confirmatory (Expt. 2) and dis-confirmatory (Expt. 3) task contexts, stimuli that were encountered frequently (vs. infrequently) were prioritized, an effect that was most pronounced for self-relevant (vs. friend-relevant) items. Further computational analyses indicated that, in each of the reported experiments, differences in performance were underpinned by variation in the rate of information uptake, with evidence extracted more rapidly from self-relevant compared to friend-relevant stimuli. These findings advance our understanding of the emergence and origin of stimulus-prioritization effects during decisional processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":501681,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research","volume":" ","pages":"1145-1164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090897/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.\",\"authors\":\"Saga L Svensson,&nbsp;Marius Golubickis,&nbsp;Hollie Maclean,&nbsp;Johanna K Falbén,&nbsp;Linn M Persson,&nbsp;Dimitra Tsamadi,&nbsp;Siobhan Caughey,&nbsp;Arash Sahraie,&nbsp;C Neil Macrae\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00426-021-01562-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Self-relevance exerts a powerful influence on information processing. Compared to material associated with other people, personally meaningful stimuli are prioritized during decision-making. Further exploring the character of this effect, here we considered the extent to which stimulus enhancement is impacted by the frequency of self-relevant versus friend-relevant material. In a matching task, participants reported whether shape-label stimulus pairs corresponded to previously learned associations (e.g., triangle = self, square = friend). Crucially however, before the task commenced, stimulus-based expectancies were provided indicating the probability with which both self- and friend-related shapes would be encountered. The results revealed that task performance was impacted by the frequency of stimulus presentation in combination with the personal relevance of the items. When self- and friend-related shapes appeared with equal frequencies, a self-prioritization effect emerged (Expt. 1). Additionally, in both confirmatory (Expt. 2) and dis-confirmatory (Expt. 3) task contexts, stimuli that were encountered frequently (vs. infrequently) were prioritized, an effect that was most pronounced for self-relevant (vs. friend-relevant) items. Further computational analyses indicated that, in each of the reported experiments, differences in performance were underpinned by variation in the rate of information uptake, with evidence extracted more rapidly from self-relevant compared to friend-relevant stimuli. These findings advance our understanding of the emergence and origin of stimulus-prioritization effects during decisional processing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1145-1164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090897/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01562-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01562-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

自我关联对信息加工具有重要影响。与与他人相关的材料相比,个人有意义的刺激在决策过程中被优先考虑。为了进一步探索这种效应的特征,我们考虑了自我相关材料和朋友相关材料的频率对刺激增强的影响程度。在配对任务中,参与者报告形状-标签刺激对是否与先前学过的联想相对应(例如,三角形=自我,正方形=朋友)。然而,至关重要的是,在任务开始之前,基于刺激的期望被提供,表明与自我和朋友相关的形状都会遇到的概率。结果表明,任务绩效受到刺激呈现频率和项目个人相关性的影响。当与自我和朋友相关的形状以相同的频率出现时,出现了自我优先化效应(见图1)。此外,在验证性(见图2)和非验证性(见图3)任务情境中,经常遇到的刺激(与不经常遇到的刺激相比)被优先化,这种效应在自我相关(与朋友相关)项目中最为明显。进一步的计算分析表明,在每个报告的实验中,表现的差异是由信息吸收速度的变化所支撑的,与朋友相关的刺激相比,从自我相关的刺激中提取证据的速度更快。这些发现促进了我们对决策加工过程中刺激优先效应的出现和起源的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.

More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.

More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.

More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.

Self-relevance exerts a powerful influence on information processing. Compared to material associated with other people, personally meaningful stimuli are prioritized during decision-making. Further exploring the character of this effect, here we considered the extent to which stimulus enhancement is impacted by the frequency of self-relevant versus friend-relevant material. In a matching task, participants reported whether shape-label stimulus pairs corresponded to previously learned associations (e.g., triangle = self, square = friend). Crucially however, before the task commenced, stimulus-based expectancies were provided indicating the probability with which both self- and friend-related shapes would be encountered. The results revealed that task performance was impacted by the frequency of stimulus presentation in combination with the personal relevance of the items. When self- and friend-related shapes appeared with equal frequencies, a self-prioritization effect emerged (Expt. 1). Additionally, in both confirmatory (Expt. 2) and dis-confirmatory (Expt. 3) task contexts, stimuli that were encountered frequently (vs. infrequently) were prioritized, an effect that was most pronounced for self-relevant (vs. friend-relevant) items. Further computational analyses indicated that, in each of the reported experiments, differences in performance were underpinned by variation in the rate of information uptake, with evidence extracted more rapidly from self-relevant compared to friend-relevant stimuli. These findings advance our understanding of the emergence and origin of stimulus-prioritization effects during decisional processing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信