Jean Jacob-Brassard, Mohammed Al-Omran, Thérèse A Stukel, Muhammad Mamdani, Douglas S Lee, Charles De Mestral
{"title":"安大略省行政数据库中外周动脉疾病血运重建诊断和程序代码的验证。","authors":"Jean Jacob-Brassard, Mohammed Al-Omran, Thérèse A Stukel, Muhammad Mamdani, Douglas S Lee, Charles De Mestral","doi":"10.25011/cim.v44i2.36354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To estimate the positive predictive value of diagnosis and procedure codes for open and endovascular revascularization for peripheral artery disease (PAD) in Ontario administrative databases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective validation study using population-based Ontario administrative databases (2005-2019) to identify a random sample of 600 patients who underwent revascularization for PAD at two academic centres, based on ICD-10 diagnosis codes and Canada Classification of Health Intervention procedure codes. Administrative data coding was compared to the gold standard diagnosis (PAD vs. non-PAD) and revascularization approach (open vs. endovascular) extracted through blinded hospital chart re-abstraction. Positive predictive values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Combinations of procedure codes with or without supplemental physician claims codes were evaluated to optimize the positive predictive value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall positive predictive value of PAD diagnosis codes was 87.5% (84.6%-90.0%). The overall positive predictive value of revascularization procedure codes was 94.3% (92.2%-96.0%), which improved through supplementation with physician fee claim codes to 98.1% (96.6%-99.0%). Algorithms to identify individuals revascularized for PAD had combined positive predictive values ranging from 82.8% (79.6%-85.8%) to 95.7% (93.5%-97.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diagnosis and procedure codes with or without physician claims codes allow for accurate identifi-cation of individuals revascularized for PAD in Ontario administrative databases.</p>","PeriodicalId":50683,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Diagnosis and Procedure Codes for Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease in Ontario Administrative Databases.\",\"authors\":\"Jean Jacob-Brassard, Mohammed Al-Omran, Thérèse A Stukel, Muhammad Mamdani, Douglas S Lee, Charles De Mestral\",\"doi\":\"10.25011/cim.v44i2.36354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To estimate the positive predictive value of diagnosis and procedure codes for open and endovascular revascularization for peripheral artery disease (PAD) in Ontario administrative databases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective validation study using population-based Ontario administrative databases (2005-2019) to identify a random sample of 600 patients who underwent revascularization for PAD at two academic centres, based on ICD-10 diagnosis codes and Canada Classification of Health Intervention procedure codes. Administrative data coding was compared to the gold standard diagnosis (PAD vs. non-PAD) and revascularization approach (open vs. endovascular) extracted through blinded hospital chart re-abstraction. Positive predictive values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Combinations of procedure codes with or without supplemental physician claims codes were evaluated to optimize the positive predictive value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall positive predictive value of PAD diagnosis codes was 87.5% (84.6%-90.0%). The overall positive predictive value of revascularization procedure codes was 94.3% (92.2%-96.0%), which improved through supplementation with physician fee claim codes to 98.1% (96.6%-99.0%). Algorithms to identify individuals revascularized for PAD had combined positive predictive values ranging from 82.8% (79.6%-85.8%) to 95.7% (93.5%-97.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diagnosis and procedure codes with or without physician claims codes allow for accurate identifi-cation of individuals revascularized for PAD in Ontario administrative databases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Investigative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Investigative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v44i2.36354\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v44i2.36354","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of Diagnosis and Procedure Codes for Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease in Ontario Administrative Databases.
Purpose: To estimate the positive predictive value of diagnosis and procedure codes for open and endovascular revascularization for peripheral artery disease (PAD) in Ontario administrative databases.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective validation study using population-based Ontario administrative databases (2005-2019) to identify a random sample of 600 patients who underwent revascularization for PAD at two academic centres, based on ICD-10 diagnosis codes and Canada Classification of Health Intervention procedure codes. Administrative data coding was compared to the gold standard diagnosis (PAD vs. non-PAD) and revascularization approach (open vs. endovascular) extracted through blinded hospital chart re-abstraction. Positive predictive values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Combinations of procedure codes with or without supplemental physician claims codes were evaluated to optimize the positive predictive value.
Results: The overall positive predictive value of PAD diagnosis codes was 87.5% (84.6%-90.0%). The overall positive predictive value of revascularization procedure codes was 94.3% (92.2%-96.0%), which improved through supplementation with physician fee claim codes to 98.1% (96.6%-99.0%). Algorithms to identify individuals revascularized for PAD had combined positive predictive values ranging from 82.8% (79.6%-85.8%) to 95.7% (93.5%-97.3%).
Conclusion: Diagnosis and procedure codes with or without physician claims codes allow for accurate identifi-cation of individuals revascularized for PAD in Ontario administrative databases.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Investigative Medicine (CIM), publishes original work in the field of Clinical Investigation. Original work includes clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical reports. Reviews include information for Continuing Medical Education (CME), narrative review articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.