{"title":"儿童变应性鼻炎患者体重测定鲁帕他定口服液:人群药代动力学研究。","authors":"Eva Santamaria, Iñaki Izquierdo, Marta Valle","doi":"10.2147/CPAA.S312911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic urticaria, both are treated in children with doses of second generation of antihistamines that have been mostly based on extrapolation of data obtained in adults. The objectives of this work were to develop a model to explain the pharmacokinetics (PK) of rupatadine, a second generation antihistamine, administered to children 2-11 years old and to calculate the non-compartmental PK parameters for two groups of age (2-5 and 6-11 years old) based on the individual Bayesian estimates from the selected model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from two PK studies with rupatadine oral solution (1 mg/mL) were pooled: Study A, an extensive blood sampling study performed in 11 children (6-11 years old) who received a single oral dose of rupatadine; and Study B, a sparse blood sampling study in 40 children (2-5 years old) receiving multiple oral doses. A simultaneous population PK model was developed using data available for all children. Using individual Bayesian estimates from the selected model, steady-state plasma concentrations for both studies were simulated and the non-parametric PK parameters were calculated for two age groups: 2-5 years (subgroup I) and 6-11 years (subgroup II).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination with clearance depending on body weight, better described the PK of rupatadine for 2-11 year old children. The plasma clearance dependence on weight was linear. The mean (SD) non-compartment PK parameters calculated using simulated plasma profiles at steady state were: C<sub>max</sub>, 2.54 (1.26) vs 1.96 (0.52) ng/mL; AUC<sub>0-24h</sub>, 10.74 (3.09) vs 10.38 (4.31) ng/mL/h; and t<sub>1/2</sub>, 12.28 (3.09) vs 15.94 (4.09) h, for children 6-11 and 2-5 years old, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PK of rupatadine depends on the weight of paediatric patients but not on their age. The dosage strategy adjusted by body weight in children 2-11 years old (2.5 mL if weight 10-25 kg, and 5 mL if ≥ 25 kg) provides similar exposure between the two groups of age, and to that obtained in adults with the 10 mg dose tablet formulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10406,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","volume":" ","pages":"115-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a1/fc/cpaa-13-115.PMC8197573.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rupatadine Oral Solution Titration by Body Weight in Paediatric Patients Suffering from Allergic Rhinitis: A Population Pharmacokinetic Study.\",\"authors\":\"Eva Santamaria, Iñaki Izquierdo, Marta Valle\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CPAA.S312911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic urticaria, both are treated in children with doses of second generation of antihistamines that have been mostly based on extrapolation of data obtained in adults. The objectives of this work were to develop a model to explain the pharmacokinetics (PK) of rupatadine, a second generation antihistamine, administered to children 2-11 years old and to calculate the non-compartmental PK parameters for two groups of age (2-5 and 6-11 years old) based on the individual Bayesian estimates from the selected model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from two PK studies with rupatadine oral solution (1 mg/mL) were pooled: Study A, an extensive blood sampling study performed in 11 children (6-11 years old) who received a single oral dose of rupatadine; and Study B, a sparse blood sampling study in 40 children (2-5 years old) receiving multiple oral doses. A simultaneous population PK model was developed using data available for all children. Using individual Bayesian estimates from the selected model, steady-state plasma concentrations for both studies were simulated and the non-parametric PK parameters were calculated for two age groups: 2-5 years (subgroup I) and 6-11 years (subgroup II).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination with clearance depending on body weight, better described the PK of rupatadine for 2-11 year old children. The plasma clearance dependence on weight was linear. The mean (SD) non-compartment PK parameters calculated using simulated plasma profiles at steady state were: C<sub>max</sub>, 2.54 (1.26) vs 1.96 (0.52) ng/mL; AUC<sub>0-24h</sub>, 10.74 (3.09) vs 10.38 (4.31) ng/mL/h; and t<sub>1/2</sub>, 12.28 (3.09) vs 15.94 (4.09) h, for children 6-11 and 2-5 years old, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PK of rupatadine depends on the weight of paediatric patients but not on their age. The dosage strategy adjusted by body weight in children 2-11 years old (2.5 mL if weight 10-25 kg, and 5 mL if ≥ 25 kg) provides similar exposure between the two groups of age, and to that obtained in adults with the 10 mg dose tablet formulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"115-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a1/fc/cpaa-13-115.PMC8197573.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S312911\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S312911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:儿童变应性鼻炎(AR)和慢性荨麻疹都使用第二代抗组胺药治疗,这主要是基于成人数据的推断。本研究的目的是建立一个模型来解释2-11岁儿童服用第二代抗组胺药鲁帕他定的药代动力学(PK),并根据所选模型的个体贝叶斯估计计算两组年龄(2-5岁和6-11岁)的非区隔PK参数。方法:将鲁帕他定口服溶液(1mg /mL)两项PK研究的数据进行汇总:研究A,在接受单次口服剂量鲁帕他定的11名儿童(6-11岁)中进行的广泛血液采样研究;研究B,一项针对40名接受多次口服剂量的儿童(2-5岁)的稀疏血液采样研究。利用所有儿童的可用数据建立了同时种群PK模型。利用所选模型的个体贝叶斯估计,模拟了两项研究的稳态血浆浓度,并计算了2-5岁(亚组I)和6-11岁(亚组II)两个年龄组的非参数PK参数。结果:具有一阶吸收和消除的双室模型,其清除率取决于体重,更好地描述了2-11岁儿童鲁帕他定的PK。血浆清除率与体重呈线性关系。利用稳态模拟血浆谱计算的非室室PK参数均值(SD)分别为:Cmax, 2.54 (1.26) vs 1.96 (0.52) ng/mL;AUC0-24h, 10.74 (3.09) vs 10.38 (4.31) ng/mL/h;6-11岁和2-5岁儿童的t1/2分别为12.28(3.09)和15.94 (4.09)h。结论:小儿患者鲁帕他定的药代动力学与体重有关,与年龄无关。2-11岁儿童按体重调整的剂量策略(体重10- 25kg为2.5 mL,≥25kg为5 mL)在两组年龄之间提供的暴露量与使用10mg剂量片剂配方的成人相似。
Rupatadine Oral Solution Titration by Body Weight in Paediatric Patients Suffering from Allergic Rhinitis: A Population Pharmacokinetic Study.
Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic urticaria, both are treated in children with doses of second generation of antihistamines that have been mostly based on extrapolation of data obtained in adults. The objectives of this work were to develop a model to explain the pharmacokinetics (PK) of rupatadine, a second generation antihistamine, administered to children 2-11 years old and to calculate the non-compartmental PK parameters for two groups of age (2-5 and 6-11 years old) based on the individual Bayesian estimates from the selected model.
Methods: Data from two PK studies with rupatadine oral solution (1 mg/mL) were pooled: Study A, an extensive blood sampling study performed in 11 children (6-11 years old) who received a single oral dose of rupatadine; and Study B, a sparse blood sampling study in 40 children (2-5 years old) receiving multiple oral doses. A simultaneous population PK model was developed using data available for all children. Using individual Bayesian estimates from the selected model, steady-state plasma concentrations for both studies were simulated and the non-parametric PK parameters were calculated for two age groups: 2-5 years (subgroup I) and 6-11 years (subgroup II).
Results: A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination with clearance depending on body weight, better described the PK of rupatadine for 2-11 year old children. The plasma clearance dependence on weight was linear. The mean (SD) non-compartment PK parameters calculated using simulated plasma profiles at steady state were: Cmax, 2.54 (1.26) vs 1.96 (0.52) ng/mL; AUC0-24h, 10.74 (3.09) vs 10.38 (4.31) ng/mL/h; and t1/2, 12.28 (3.09) vs 15.94 (4.09) h, for children 6-11 and 2-5 years old, respectively.
Conclusions: The PK of rupatadine depends on the weight of paediatric patients but not on their age. The dosage strategy adjusted by body weight in children 2-11 years old (2.5 mL if weight 10-25 kg, and 5 mL if ≥ 25 kg) provides similar exposure between the two groups of age, and to that obtained in adults with the 10 mg dose tablet formulation.