James Ronald, Nicholas Durocher, Jonathan G. Martin, Tony P. Smith, Charles Y. Kim, Alan A. Sag
{"title":"解剖鼻烟盒中重复远端经桡骨通路的评价。","authors":"James Ronald, Nicholas Durocher, Jonathan G. Martin, Tony P. Smith, Charles Y. Kim, Alan A. Sag","doi":"10.5152/dir.2021.20375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is increasing interest in the distal radial artery in the anatomic snuffbox as an alternative arterial access point, but the durability of the distal radial artery to support repetitive accesses over multiple procedures is not well established. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate success rates for repeated left-sided distal transradial access (ldTRA) in the anatomic snuffbox.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single institution retrospective study, all patients undergoing radioembolization treatments from January 1st, 2019 to May 1st, 2020 were prospectively evaluated for ldTRA. ldTRA was performed by 15 different operators. Exclusion criteria were a left radiocephalic hemodialysis fistula, inability to properly position the arm, Barbeau D waveform, or failed prior ldTRA due to tortuosity. Barbeau patterns, arterial sizes, and success rates at the first, second, and third ldTRA were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were evaluated for ldTRA and 44, 39, and 10 underwent one, two, and three ldTRA attempts for a total of 93 procedures. There was no significant change in Barbeau patterns between the first and second (p = 0.13) or first and third (p = 1.0) ldTRA. There was no significant change in artery size between the first (mean, 2.3 mm; range, 1.5-3.4 mm) and second (mean, 2.3 mm; range, 1.6-3.3 mm) (p = 0.59) and first and third (mean, 2.4 mm; range, 1.9-3.3) (p = 0.45) ldTRA. The success rate was not significantly different between the first (93%, 41/44, 95% CI 81%-99%), second (95%, 37/39, 95% CI 83%-99%), and third (100%, 10/10, 95% CI 69%-100%) procedure (p = 1.0). The asymptomatic occlusion rate was 4.1% (2/49, 95% CI 0%-14%), and subsequent ldTRA was successfully completed in both patients with occlusions. There were no hemorrhagic or ischemic complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Success rates are indistinguishable among first, second, and third time ldTRA suggesting that this is a durable access point.</p>","PeriodicalId":50582,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"639-643"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480952/pdf/dir-27-5-639.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of repeat distal transradial access in the anatomic snuffbox.\",\"authors\":\"James Ronald, Nicholas Durocher, Jonathan G. Martin, Tony P. Smith, Charles Y. Kim, Alan A. Sag\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/dir.2021.20375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is increasing interest in the distal radial artery in the anatomic snuffbox as an alternative arterial access point, but the durability of the distal radial artery to support repetitive accesses over multiple procedures is not well established. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate success rates for repeated left-sided distal transradial access (ldTRA) in the anatomic snuffbox.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single institution retrospective study, all patients undergoing radioembolization treatments from January 1st, 2019 to May 1st, 2020 were prospectively evaluated for ldTRA. ldTRA was performed by 15 different operators. Exclusion criteria were a left radiocephalic hemodialysis fistula, inability to properly position the arm, Barbeau D waveform, or failed prior ldTRA due to tortuosity. Barbeau patterns, arterial sizes, and success rates at the first, second, and third ldTRA were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were evaluated for ldTRA and 44, 39, and 10 underwent one, two, and three ldTRA attempts for a total of 93 procedures. There was no significant change in Barbeau patterns between the first and second (p = 0.13) or first and third (p = 1.0) ldTRA. There was no significant change in artery size between the first (mean, 2.3 mm; range, 1.5-3.4 mm) and second (mean, 2.3 mm; range, 1.6-3.3 mm) (p = 0.59) and first and third (mean, 2.4 mm; range, 1.9-3.3) (p = 0.45) ldTRA. The success rate was not significantly different between the first (93%, 41/44, 95% CI 81%-99%), second (95%, 37/39, 95% CI 83%-99%), and third (100%, 10/10, 95% CI 69%-100%) procedure (p = 1.0). The asymptomatic occlusion rate was 4.1% (2/49, 95% CI 0%-14%), and subsequent ldTRA was successfully completed in both patients with occlusions. There were no hemorrhagic or ischemic complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Success rates are indistinguishable among first, second, and third time ldTRA suggesting that this is a durable access point.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"639-643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480952/pdf/dir-27-5-639.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2021.20375\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2021.20375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:越来越多的人对解剖鼻烟盒中的桡动脉远端作为替代动脉通路点感兴趣,但桡动脉远端在多次手术中支持重复通路的耐久性尚未得到很好的确定。因此,本研究的目的是评估在解剖鼻烟壶中重复左侧远端经桡骨通路(ldTRA)的成功率。方法:在这项单机构回顾性研究中,对2019年1月1日至2020年5月1日接受放射栓塞治疗的所有患者进行ldTRA前瞻性评估。ldTRA由15位不同的操作者进行。排除标准为左放射性头部血液透析瘘,手臂不能正确定位,Barbeau D波形,或先前因扭曲导致的ldTRA失败。比较第一、第二、第三次ldTRA的Barbeau模式、动脉大小和成功率。结果:50例患者接受ldTRA评估,44例,39例,10例接受了1次,2次和3次ldTRA尝试,共93次手术。第一次和第二次ldTRA (p = 0.13)或第一次和第三次ldTRA (p = 1.0)之间Barbeau模式无显著变化。第一组患者动脉大小无明显变化(平均2.3 mm;范围,1.5-3.4毫米)和第二(平均,2.3毫米;范围,1.6-3.3 mm) (p = 0.59)和第一和第三(平均,2.4 mm;范围为1.9-3.3)(p = 0.45) ldTRA。第一次手术(93%,41/44,95% CI 81%-99%)、第二次手术(95%,37/39,95% CI 83%-99%)和第三次手术(100%,10/10,95% CI 69%-100%)的成功率无显著差异(p = 1.0)。无症状闭塞率为4.1% (2/49,95% CI 0%-14%),两例闭塞患者后续ldTRA均成功完成。无出血性或缺血性并发症。结论:第一次,第二次和第三次ldTRA的成功率难以区分,这表明这是一个持久的接入点。
Evaluation of repeat distal transradial access in the anatomic snuffbox.
Purpose: There is increasing interest in the distal radial artery in the anatomic snuffbox as an alternative arterial access point, but the durability of the distal radial artery to support repetitive accesses over multiple procedures is not well established. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate success rates for repeated left-sided distal transradial access (ldTRA) in the anatomic snuffbox.
Methods: In this single institution retrospective study, all patients undergoing radioembolization treatments from January 1st, 2019 to May 1st, 2020 were prospectively evaluated for ldTRA. ldTRA was performed by 15 different operators. Exclusion criteria were a left radiocephalic hemodialysis fistula, inability to properly position the arm, Barbeau D waveform, or failed prior ldTRA due to tortuosity. Barbeau patterns, arterial sizes, and success rates at the first, second, and third ldTRA were compared.
Results: Fifty patients were evaluated for ldTRA and 44, 39, and 10 underwent one, two, and three ldTRA attempts for a total of 93 procedures. There was no significant change in Barbeau patterns between the first and second (p = 0.13) or first and third (p = 1.0) ldTRA. There was no significant change in artery size between the first (mean, 2.3 mm; range, 1.5-3.4 mm) and second (mean, 2.3 mm; range, 1.6-3.3 mm) (p = 0.59) and first and third (mean, 2.4 mm; range, 1.9-3.3) (p = 0.45) ldTRA. The success rate was not significantly different between the first (93%, 41/44, 95% CI 81%-99%), second (95%, 37/39, 95% CI 83%-99%), and third (100%, 10/10, 95% CI 69%-100%) procedure (p = 1.0). The asymptomatic occlusion rate was 4.1% (2/49, 95% CI 0%-14%), and subsequent ldTRA was successfully completed in both patients with occlusions. There were no hemorrhagic or ischemic complications.
Conclusion: Success rates are indistinguishable among first, second, and third time ldTRA suggesting that this is a durable access point.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English.
The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.