{"title":"填空中的填空:句子生成中的远距离依存关系形成","authors":"Shota Momma","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a sentence like <em>Who does the artist think chased the chef?</em>, the <em>who</em> at the beginning depends on the last bit of the sentence, <em>chased the chef</em>. This is an instance of a <em>long</em>-<em>distance dependency.</em><span> What is the nature of the cognitive process that allows speakers to produce sentences that include distant elements that form dependencies? In four experiments, speakers described drawings that elicited long-distance dependencies. Critically, speakers were sometimes primed to produce a </span><em>that</em> in sentences where <em>that</em> was ungrammatical due to a grammatical constraint known as the <em>that</em>-trace constraint (e.g.,*<em>Who does the artist think that chased the chef</em>). Results showed that, when primed to say an ungrammatical <em>that</em>, speakers were slower to <em>start</em> to speak. Because the <em>that</em>-trace constraint applies selectively to certain configurations of long-distance dependencies, this suggests that the grammatical details of the long-distance dependency are already planned before speakers start to speak the sentences involving long-distance dependencies. I propose a formal model that explains how speakers plan long-distance dependencies in advance of speaking them while also managing the cognitive pressure to speak sentences incrementally.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50669,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101411","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Filling the gap in gap-filling: Long-distance dependency formation in sentence production\",\"authors\":\"Shota Momma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In a sentence like <em>Who does the artist think chased the chef?</em>, the <em>who</em> at the beginning depends on the last bit of the sentence, <em>chased the chef</em>. This is an instance of a <em>long</em>-<em>distance dependency.</em><span> What is the nature of the cognitive process that allows speakers to produce sentences that include distant elements that form dependencies? In four experiments, speakers described drawings that elicited long-distance dependencies. Critically, speakers were sometimes primed to produce a </span><em>that</em> in sentences where <em>that</em> was ungrammatical due to a grammatical constraint known as the <em>that</em>-trace constraint (e.g.,*<em>Who does the artist think that chased the chef</em>). Results showed that, when primed to say an ungrammatical <em>that</em>, speakers were slower to <em>start</em> to speak. Because the <em>that</em>-trace constraint applies selectively to certain configurations of long-distance dependencies, this suggests that the grammatical details of the long-distance dependency are already planned before speakers start to speak the sentences involving long-distance dependencies. I propose a formal model that explains how speakers plan long-distance dependencies in advance of speaking them while also managing the cognitive pressure to speak sentences incrementally.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101411\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010028521000347\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010028521000347","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Filling the gap in gap-filling: Long-distance dependency formation in sentence production
In a sentence like Who does the artist think chased the chef?, the who at the beginning depends on the last bit of the sentence, chased the chef. This is an instance of a long-distance dependency. What is the nature of the cognitive process that allows speakers to produce sentences that include distant elements that form dependencies? In four experiments, speakers described drawings that elicited long-distance dependencies. Critically, speakers were sometimes primed to produce a that in sentences where that was ungrammatical due to a grammatical constraint known as the that-trace constraint (e.g.,*Who does the artist think that chased the chef). Results showed that, when primed to say an ungrammatical that, speakers were slower to start to speak. Because the that-trace constraint applies selectively to certain configurations of long-distance dependencies, this suggests that the grammatical details of the long-distance dependency are already planned before speakers start to speak the sentences involving long-distance dependencies. I propose a formal model that explains how speakers plan long-distance dependencies in advance of speaking them while also managing the cognitive pressure to speak sentences incrementally.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Psychology is concerned with advances in the study of attention, memory, language processing, perception, problem solving, and thinking. Cognitive Psychology specializes in extensive articles that have a major impact on cognitive theory and provide new theoretical advances.
Research Areas include:
• Artificial intelligence
• Developmental psychology
• Linguistics
• Neurophysiology
• Social psychology.