30年代椅架测试作为日本上班族久坐行为肌肉骨骼疾病风险指标的实证研究:一项横断面实证研究。

IF 3.3 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Pub Date : 2021-03-22 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000211
Azusa Arimoto, Shoko Ishikawa, Etsuko Tadaka
{"title":"30年代椅架测试作为日本上班族久坐行为肌肉骨骼疾病风险指标的实证研究:一项横断面实证研究。","authors":"Azusa Arimoto,&nbsp;Shoko Ishikawa,&nbsp;Etsuko Tadaka","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sedentary behaviour among office workers and the risk of adverse health outcomes are public health problems. However, risk indicators for these outcomes require invasive biochemical examination. A proactive screening tool using a non-invasive, easy-to-use method is required to assess the risk focused on musculoskeletal health for primary prevention. However, middle-aged adults have insufficient awareness of musculoskeletal disorders. This study examined to determine whether the 30-s chair-stand test (CS-30) can be used as a proactive screening index for musculoskeletal disorder risk of sedentary behaviour in office workers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaires and physical measurements.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four workplaces located in a metropolitan area of Japan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>431 Japanese office workers aged 20-64 years. 406 valid sets of results remained (valid response rate: 94.2%).</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </strong>Musculoskeletal function was measured using the CS-30, quadriceps muscle strength. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the sensitivity, specificity and optimal cut-off value for the CS-30. The risk of future incidence of musculoskeletal disorders was calculated using current quadriceps muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total participants, 47.0% were male and the mean sitting time in work duration was 455.6 min/day (SD=111.2 min). The mean lower limb quadriceps muscle strength was 444.8 N (SD=131.3 N). For the optimum cut-off value of 23 on the CS-30 for all participants, sensitivity was 0.809 and specificity was 0.231. For men, the optimum cut-off was 25, with a sensitivity of 0.855 and a specificity 0.172. For women, the optimum cut-off was 21, with a sensitivity of 0.854 and a specificity 0.275.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sensitivity was high, but specificity was insufficient. The CS-30 may be a potential proactive screening index for musculoskeletal disorder risk of sedentary behaviour, in combination with other indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":36307,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","volume":" ","pages":"158-165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000211","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical study of the 30-s chair-stand test as an indicator for musculoskeletal disorder risk of sedentary behaviour in Japanese office workers: a cross-sectional empirical study.\",\"authors\":\"Azusa Arimoto,&nbsp;Shoko Ishikawa,&nbsp;Etsuko Tadaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sedentary behaviour among office workers and the risk of adverse health outcomes are public health problems. However, risk indicators for these outcomes require invasive biochemical examination. A proactive screening tool using a non-invasive, easy-to-use method is required to assess the risk focused on musculoskeletal health for primary prevention. However, middle-aged adults have insufficient awareness of musculoskeletal disorders. This study examined to determine whether the 30-s chair-stand test (CS-30) can be used as a proactive screening index for musculoskeletal disorder risk of sedentary behaviour in office workers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaires and physical measurements.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four workplaces located in a metropolitan area of Japan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>431 Japanese office workers aged 20-64 years. 406 valid sets of results remained (valid response rate: 94.2%).</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </strong>Musculoskeletal function was measured using the CS-30, quadriceps muscle strength. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the sensitivity, specificity and optimal cut-off value for the CS-30. The risk of future incidence of musculoskeletal disorders was calculated using current quadriceps muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total participants, 47.0% were male and the mean sitting time in work duration was 455.6 min/day (SD=111.2 min). The mean lower limb quadriceps muscle strength was 444.8 N (SD=131.3 N). For the optimum cut-off value of 23 on the CS-30 for all participants, sensitivity was 0.809 and specificity was 0.231. For men, the optimum cut-off was 25, with a sensitivity of 0.855 and a specificity 0.172. For women, the optimum cut-off was 21, with a sensitivity of 0.854 and a specificity 0.275.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sensitivity was high, but specificity was insufficient. The CS-30 may be a potential proactive screening index for musculoskeletal disorder risk of sedentary behaviour, in combination with other indicators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"158-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000211\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:办公室工作人员的久坐行为和不良健康结果的风险是公共卫生问题。然而,这些结果的风险指标需要侵入性生化检查。需要一种使用非侵入性、易于使用的方法的主动筛查工具来评估肌肉骨骼健康的风险,以进行一级预防。然而,中年人对肌肉骨骼疾病的认识不足。本研究旨在确定30-s椅架测试(CS-30)是否可以作为办公室工作人员久坐行为引起的肌肉骨骼疾病风险的主动筛查指标。设计:横断面研究采用自我管理问卷和物理测量。背景:位于日本大都市的四个工作场所。参与者:431名20-64岁的日本上班族。剩余406组有效结果(有效回复率:94.2%)。主要和次要结果测量:肌肉骨骼功能使用CS-30,股四头肌力量测量。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析确定CS-30的敏感性、特异性和最佳截止值。使用当前的股四头肌力量计算未来发生肌肉骨骼疾病的风险。结果:在所有参与者中,47.0%为男性,在工作时间中平均坐着时间为455.6分钟/天(SD=111.2分钟)。下肢股四头肌肌力平均值为444.8 N (SD=131.3 N)。对于所有参与者,CS-30的最佳临界值为23,敏感性为0.809,特异性为0.231。对于男性,最佳临界值为25,敏感性为0.855,特异性为0.172。对于女性,最佳临界值为21,敏感性为0.854,特异性为0.275。结论:该方法敏感性高,特异性不足。结合其他指标,CS-30可能是久坐行为引起的肌肉骨骼疾病风险的潜在主动筛查指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Empirical study of the 30-s chair-stand test as an indicator for musculoskeletal disorder risk of sedentary behaviour in Japanese office workers: a cross-sectional empirical study.

Empirical study of the 30-s chair-stand test as an indicator for musculoskeletal disorder risk of sedentary behaviour in Japanese office workers: a cross-sectional empirical study.

Empirical study of the 30-s chair-stand test as an indicator for musculoskeletal disorder risk of sedentary behaviour in Japanese office workers: a cross-sectional empirical study.

Empirical study of the 30-s chair-stand test as an indicator for musculoskeletal disorder risk of sedentary behaviour in Japanese office workers: a cross-sectional empirical study.

Objectives: Sedentary behaviour among office workers and the risk of adverse health outcomes are public health problems. However, risk indicators for these outcomes require invasive biochemical examination. A proactive screening tool using a non-invasive, easy-to-use method is required to assess the risk focused on musculoskeletal health for primary prevention. However, middle-aged adults have insufficient awareness of musculoskeletal disorders. This study examined to determine whether the 30-s chair-stand test (CS-30) can be used as a proactive screening index for musculoskeletal disorder risk of sedentary behaviour in office workers.

Design: Cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaires and physical measurements.

Setting: Four workplaces located in a metropolitan area of Japan.

Participants: 431 Japanese office workers aged 20-64 years. 406 valid sets of results remained (valid response rate: 94.2%).

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Musculoskeletal function was measured using the CS-30, quadriceps muscle strength. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the sensitivity, specificity and optimal cut-off value for the CS-30. The risk of future incidence of musculoskeletal disorders was calculated using current quadriceps muscle strength.

Results: In total participants, 47.0% were male and the mean sitting time in work duration was 455.6 min/day (SD=111.2 min). The mean lower limb quadriceps muscle strength was 444.8 N (SD=131.3 N). For the optimum cut-off value of 23 on the CS-30 for all participants, sensitivity was 0.809 and specificity was 0.231. For men, the optimum cut-off was 25, with a sensitivity of 0.855 and a specificity 0.172. For women, the optimum cut-off was 21, with a sensitivity of 0.854 and a specificity 0.275.

Conclusions: Sensitivity was high, but specificity was insufficient. The CS-30 may be a potential proactive screening index for musculoskeletal disorder risk of sedentary behaviour, in combination with other indicators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信