{"title":"基于延迟结果优化剂量方案的I-II期篮子试验设计","authors":"Ruitao Lin, Peter F Thall, Ying Yuan","doi":"10.1214/20-ba1205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper proposes a Bayesian adaptive basket trial design to optimize the dose-schedule regimes of an experimental agent within disease subtypes, called \"baskets\", for phase I-II clinical trials based on late-onset efficacy and toxicity. To characterize the association among the baskets and regimes, a Bayesian hierarchical model is assumed that includes a heterogeneity parameter, adaptively updated during the trial, that quantifies information shared across baskets. To account for late-onset outcomes when doing sequential decision making, unobserved outcomes are treated as missing values and imputed by exploiting early biomarker and low-grade toxicity information. Elicited joint utilities of efficacy and toxicity are used for decision making. Patients are randomized adaptively to regimes while accounting for baskets, with randomization probabilities proportional to the posterior probability of achieving maximum utility. Simulations are presented to assess the design's robustness and ability to identify optimal dose-schedule regimes within disease subtypes, and to compare it to a simplified design that treats the subtypes independently.</p>","PeriodicalId":55398,"journal":{"name":"Bayesian Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277108/pdf/nihms-1714036.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Phase I-II Basket Trial Design to Optimize Dose-Schedule Regimes Based on Delayed Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Ruitao Lin, Peter F Thall, Ying Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1214/20-ba1205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper proposes a Bayesian adaptive basket trial design to optimize the dose-schedule regimes of an experimental agent within disease subtypes, called \\\"baskets\\\", for phase I-II clinical trials based on late-onset efficacy and toxicity. To characterize the association among the baskets and regimes, a Bayesian hierarchical model is assumed that includes a heterogeneity parameter, adaptively updated during the trial, that quantifies information shared across baskets. To account for late-onset outcomes when doing sequential decision making, unobserved outcomes are treated as missing values and imputed by exploiting early biomarker and low-grade toxicity information. Elicited joint utilities of efficacy and toxicity are used for decision making. Patients are randomized adaptively to regimes while accounting for baskets, with randomization probabilities proportional to the posterior probability of achieving maximum utility. Simulations are presented to assess the design's robustness and ability to identify optimal dose-schedule regimes within disease subtypes, and to compare it to a simplified design that treats the subtypes independently.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bayesian Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277108/pdf/nihms-1714036.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bayesian Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1214/20-ba1205\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/3/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bayesian Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/20-ba1205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Phase I-II Basket Trial Design to Optimize Dose-Schedule Regimes Based on Delayed Outcomes.
This paper proposes a Bayesian adaptive basket trial design to optimize the dose-schedule regimes of an experimental agent within disease subtypes, called "baskets", for phase I-II clinical trials based on late-onset efficacy and toxicity. To characterize the association among the baskets and regimes, a Bayesian hierarchical model is assumed that includes a heterogeneity parameter, adaptively updated during the trial, that quantifies information shared across baskets. To account for late-onset outcomes when doing sequential decision making, unobserved outcomes are treated as missing values and imputed by exploiting early biomarker and low-grade toxicity information. Elicited joint utilities of efficacy and toxicity are used for decision making. Patients are randomized adaptively to regimes while accounting for baskets, with randomization probabilities proportional to the posterior probability of achieving maximum utility. Simulations are presented to assess the design's robustness and ability to identify optimal dose-schedule regimes within disease subtypes, and to compare it to a simplified design that treats the subtypes independently.
期刊介绍:
Bayesian Analysis is an electronic journal of the International Society for Bayesian Analysis. It seeks to publish a wide range of articles that demonstrate or discuss Bayesian methods in some theoretical or applied context. The journal welcomes submissions involving presentation of new computational and statistical methods; critical reviews and discussions of existing approaches; historical perspectives; description of important scientific or policy application areas; case studies; and methods for experimental design, data collection, data sharing, or data mining.
Evaluation of submissions is based on importance of content and effectiveness of communication. Discussion papers are typically chosen by the Editor in Chief, or suggested by an Editor, among the regular submissions. In addition, the Journal encourages individual authors to submit manuscripts for consideration as discussion papers.