旨在测量疼痛情感成分的现有评估工具的有效性:系统回顾。

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Patient Related Outcome Measures Pub Date : 2021-07-06 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PROM.S304950
Anders Heiberg Agerbeck, Frederik Handberg Juul Martiny, Christian Patrick Jauernik, Karin Due Bruun, Or Joseph Rahbek, Kristine H Bissenbakker, John Brodersen
{"title":"旨在测量疼痛情感成分的现有评估工具的有效性:系统回顾。","authors":"Anders Heiberg Agerbeck,&nbsp;Frederik Handberg Juul Martiny,&nbsp;Christian Patrick Jauernik,&nbsp;Karin Due Bruun,&nbsp;Or Joseph Rahbek,&nbsp;Kristine H Bissenbakker,&nbsp;John Brodersen","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S304950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which aim to measure the affective component of pain and to assess their content validity, unidimensionality, measurement invariance, and Internal consistency in patients with chronic pain. The study was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. A protocol of the review was submitted to PROSPERO before data extraction. Eligible studies were any type of study that investigated at least one of the domains: PROM development, content validity, dimensionality, internal consistency, or measurement invariance of any type of scale that claimed to measure the affective component of pain among patients with chronic pain. The databases Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. The database search was supplemented by looking for relevant articles in the reference list of included studies, ie backtracking. All included studies were assessed independently by two authors according to the \"COSMIN methodology on Systematic Reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures\". Descriptive data synthesis of the identified PROMs was conducted. The search yielded 11,242 titles of which 283 were assessed at the full-text level. Full-text screening led to the inclusion of 11 studies and an additional 28 studies were identified via backtracking, leading to the inclusion of 39 studies in total in the review. Included studies described the development and validity of 10 unique PROMs, all of which we assessed to have potentially inadequate content validity and doubtful psychometric properties. No studies reported whether the PROMs possessed invariant measurement properties. The existing PROMs measuring affective components of chronic pain potentially lack content validity and have inadequate psychometric measurement properties. There is a need for new PROMs measuring the affective component of chronic pain that possess high content validity and adequate psychometric measurement properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fe/f8/prom-12-213.PMC8274708.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of Current Assessment Tools Aiming to Measure the Affective Component of Pain: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Anders Heiberg Agerbeck,&nbsp;Frederik Handberg Juul Martiny,&nbsp;Christian Patrick Jauernik,&nbsp;Karin Due Bruun,&nbsp;Or Joseph Rahbek,&nbsp;Kristine H Bissenbakker,&nbsp;John Brodersen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PROM.S304950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which aim to measure the affective component of pain and to assess their content validity, unidimensionality, measurement invariance, and Internal consistency in patients with chronic pain. The study was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. A protocol of the review was submitted to PROSPERO before data extraction. Eligible studies were any type of study that investigated at least one of the domains: PROM development, content validity, dimensionality, internal consistency, or measurement invariance of any type of scale that claimed to measure the affective component of pain among patients with chronic pain. The databases Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. The database search was supplemented by looking for relevant articles in the reference list of included studies, ie backtracking. All included studies were assessed independently by two authors according to the \\\"COSMIN methodology on Systematic Reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures\\\". Descriptive data synthesis of the identified PROMs was conducted. The search yielded 11,242 titles of which 283 were assessed at the full-text level. Full-text screening led to the inclusion of 11 studies and an additional 28 studies were identified via backtracking, leading to the inclusion of 39 studies in total in the review. Included studies described the development and validity of 10 unique PROMs, all of which we assessed to have potentially inadequate content validity and doubtful psychometric properties. No studies reported whether the PROMs possessed invariant measurement properties. The existing PROMs measuring affective components of chronic pain potentially lack content validity and have inadequate psychometric measurement properties. There is a need for new PROMs measuring the affective component of chronic pain that possess high content validity and adequate psychometric measurement properties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Related Outcome Measures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fe/f8/prom-12-213.PMC8274708.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Related Outcome Measures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S304950\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S304950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的目的是确定患者报告的结果测量(PROMs),其目的是测量疼痛的情感成分,并评估其内容效度、单维性、测量不变性和慢性疼痛患者的内部一致性。该研究是根据PRISMA指南报道的。在数据提取之前,向PROSPERO提交了一份审查方案。合格的研究是调查至少一个领域的任何类型的研究:PROM发展、内容效度、维度、内部一致性或测量不变性的任何类型的量表,声称测量慢性疼痛患者疼痛的情感成分。检索数据库Medline、Embase、PsycINFO和Cochrane Library以寻找符合条件的研究。数据库检索的补充是在纳入研究的参考文献列表中查找相关文章,即回溯。所有纳入的研究均由两位作者根据“COSMIN方法对患者报告的结果措施进行系统评价”进行独立评估。对鉴定出的PROMs进行描述性数据综合。搜索产生了11,242个标题,其中283个标题被评估为全文级别。全文筛选纳入了11项研究,通过回溯确定了另外28项研究,最终纳入了39项研究。纳入的研究描述了10个独特的prom的发展和效度,我们评估了所有这些prom的潜在内容效度不足和可疑的心理测量特性。没有研究报道prom是否具有不变的测量性质。现有的测量慢性疼痛情感成分的PROMs可能缺乏内容效度,并且心理测量特性不足。目前需要一种新的具有高内容效度和足够的心理测量特性的测量慢性疼痛情感成分的PROMs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validity of Current Assessment Tools Aiming to Measure the Affective Component of Pain: A Systematic Review.

Validity of Current Assessment Tools Aiming to Measure the Affective Component of Pain: A Systematic Review.

The objective of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which aim to measure the affective component of pain and to assess their content validity, unidimensionality, measurement invariance, and Internal consistency in patients with chronic pain. The study was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. A protocol of the review was submitted to PROSPERO before data extraction. Eligible studies were any type of study that investigated at least one of the domains: PROM development, content validity, dimensionality, internal consistency, or measurement invariance of any type of scale that claimed to measure the affective component of pain among patients with chronic pain. The databases Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. The database search was supplemented by looking for relevant articles in the reference list of included studies, ie backtracking. All included studies were assessed independently by two authors according to the "COSMIN methodology on Systematic Reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures". Descriptive data synthesis of the identified PROMs was conducted. The search yielded 11,242 titles of which 283 were assessed at the full-text level. Full-text screening led to the inclusion of 11 studies and an additional 28 studies were identified via backtracking, leading to the inclusion of 39 studies in total in the review. Included studies described the development and validity of 10 unique PROMs, all of which we assessed to have potentially inadequate content validity and doubtful psychometric properties. No studies reported whether the PROMs possessed invariant measurement properties. The existing PROMs measuring affective components of chronic pain potentially lack content validity and have inadequate psychometric measurement properties. There is a need for new PROMs measuring the affective component of chronic pain that possess high content validity and adequate psychometric measurement properties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Related Outcome Measures
Patient Related Outcome Measures HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信