Conners连续表现测试-3 (CPT-3)嵌入表现效度指标在成人临床样本中用于ADHD评估的检验。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Developmental Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-13 DOI:10.1080/87565641.2021.1951270
Lauren M Scimeca, Lindsey Holbrook, Tasha Rhoads, Brian M Cerny, Kyle J Jennette, Zachary J Resch, Maximillian A Obolsky, Gabriel P Ovsiew, Jason R Soble
{"title":"Conners连续表现测试-3 (CPT-3)嵌入表现效度指标在成人临床样本中用于ADHD评估的检验。","authors":"Lauren M Scimeca,&nbsp;Lindsey Holbrook,&nbsp;Tasha Rhoads,&nbsp;Brian M Cerny,&nbsp;Kyle J Jennette,&nbsp;Zachary J Resch,&nbsp;Maximillian A Obolsky,&nbsp;Gabriel P Ovsiew,&nbsp;Jason R Soble","doi":"10.1080/87565641.2021.1951270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated multiple previously-identified Continuous Performance Test-Third Edition (CPT-3) scores as embedded validity indicators (EVIs) among 201 adults undergoing neuropsychological evaluation for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) divided into valid (n = 169) and invalid (n = 32) groups based on seven criterion measures. Although 6/10 CPT-3 scores accurately detected invalidity, only two reached minimally acceptable classification accuracy of ≥0.70. The remaining four had unacceptably low accuracy (AUCs = 0.62-0.69) with 0.19-0.41 sensitivity at ≥0.90 specificity. Composite scores did not provide better classification accuracy than individual CPT-3 scores. In sum, CPT-3 individual and composite scores generally are not accurate PVTs among adults undergoing clinical evaluation for ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50586,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Neuropsychology","volume":"46 5","pages":"347-359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/87565641.2021.1951270","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Conners Continuous Performance Test-3 (CPT-3) Embedded Performance Validity Indicators in an Adult Clinical Sample Referred for ADHD Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren M Scimeca,&nbsp;Lindsey Holbrook,&nbsp;Tasha Rhoads,&nbsp;Brian M Cerny,&nbsp;Kyle J Jennette,&nbsp;Zachary J Resch,&nbsp;Maximillian A Obolsky,&nbsp;Gabriel P Ovsiew,&nbsp;Jason R Soble\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/87565641.2021.1951270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated multiple previously-identified Continuous Performance Test-Third Edition (CPT-3) scores as embedded validity indicators (EVIs) among 201 adults undergoing neuropsychological evaluation for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) divided into valid (n = 169) and invalid (n = 32) groups based on seven criterion measures. Although 6/10 CPT-3 scores accurately detected invalidity, only two reached minimally acceptable classification accuracy of ≥0.70. The remaining four had unacceptably low accuracy (AUCs = 0.62-0.69) with 0.19-0.41 sensitivity at ≥0.90 specificity. Composite scores did not provide better classification accuracy than individual CPT-3 scores. In sum, CPT-3 individual and composite scores generally are not accurate PVTs among adults undergoing clinical evaluation for ADHD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"347-359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/87565641.2021.1951270\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2021.1951270\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2021.1951270","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

本研究对201名接受注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)神经心理学评估的成年人进行了多重先前确定的连续表现测试第三版(CPT-3)分数作为嵌入效度指标(EVIs)的评估,该评估基于7个标准测量,分为有效组(n = 169)和无效组(n = 32)。虽然6/10的CPT-3评分能准确检测到无效,但只有2个达到≥0.70的最低可接受分类精度。其余4种的准确度低得令人无法接受(auc = 0.62-0.69),敏感性为0.19-0.41,特异性≥0.90。综合评分并不比单独的CPT-3评分提供更好的分类准确性。总之,在接受ADHD临床评估的成人中,CPT-3单项评分和综合评分通常不是准确的pvt。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining Conners Continuous Performance Test-3 (CPT-3) Embedded Performance Validity Indicators in an Adult Clinical Sample Referred for ADHD Evaluation.

This study evaluated multiple previously-identified Continuous Performance Test-Third Edition (CPT-3) scores as embedded validity indicators (EVIs) among 201 adults undergoing neuropsychological evaluation for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) divided into valid (n = 169) and invalid (n = 32) groups based on seven criterion measures. Although 6/10 CPT-3 scores accurately detected invalidity, only two reached minimally acceptable classification accuracy of ≥0.70. The remaining four had unacceptably low accuracy (AUCs = 0.62-0.69) with 0.19-0.41 sensitivity at ≥0.90 specificity. Composite scores did not provide better classification accuracy than individual CPT-3 scores. In sum, CPT-3 individual and composite scores generally are not accurate PVTs among adults undergoing clinical evaluation for ADHD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to exploring relationships between brain and behavior across the life span, Developmental Neuropsychology publishes scholarly papers on the appearance and development of behavioral functions, such as language, perception, and social, motivational and cognitive processes as they relate to brain functions and structures. Appropriate subjects include studies of changes in cognitive function—brain structure relationships across a time period, early cognitive behaviors in normal and brain-damaged children, plasticity and recovery of function after early brain damage, the development of complex cognitive and motor skills, and specific and nonspecific disturbances, such as learning disabilities, mental retardation, schizophrenia, stuttering, and developmental aphasia. In the gerontologic areas, relevant subjects include neuropsychological analyses of normal age-related changes in brain and behavioral functions, such as sensory, motor, cognitive, and adaptive abilities; studies of age-related diseases of the nervous system; and recovery of function in later life. Empirical studies, research reviews, case reports, critical commentaries, and book reviews are featured in each issue. By publishing both basic and clinical studies of the developing and aging brain, the journal encourages additional scholarly work that advances understanding of the field of lifespan developmental neuropsychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信