扩大对非传染性疾病患者的综合护理:对斯洛文尼亚和比利时保健障碍和促进因素的分析。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zdravstveno Varstvo Pub Date : 2021-06-28 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI:10.2478/sjph-2021-0023
Črt Zavrnik, Katrien Danhieux, Miriam Hurtado Monarres, Nataša Stojnić, Majda Mori Lukančič, Monika Martens, Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš, Edwin Wouters, Josefien van Olmen, Antonija Poplas-Susič
{"title":"扩大对非传染性疾病患者的综合护理:对斯洛文尼亚和比利时保健障碍和促进因素的分析。","authors":"Črt Zavrnik,&nbsp;Katrien Danhieux,&nbsp;Miriam Hurtado Monarres,&nbsp;Nataša Stojnić,&nbsp;Majda Mori Lukančič,&nbsp;Monika Martens,&nbsp;Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš,&nbsp;Edwin Wouters,&nbsp;Josefien van Olmen,&nbsp;Antonija Poplas-Susič","doi":"10.2478/sjph-2021-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although the concept of integrated care for non-communicable diseases was introduced at the primary level to move from disease-centered to patient-centered care, it has only been partially implemented in European countries. The aim of this study was to identify and compare identified facilitators and barriers to scale-up this concept between Slovenia and Belgium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative study. Fifteen focus groups and fifty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders at the micro, meso and macro levels. In addition, data from two previously published studies were used for the analysis. Data collection and analysis was initially conducted at country level. Finally, the data was evaluated by a cross-country team to assess similarities and differences between countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four topics were identified in the study: patient-centered care, teamwork, coordination of care and task delegation. Despite the different contexts, true teamwork and patient-centered care are limited in both countries by hierarchies and a very heavily skewed medical approach. The organization of primary healthcare in Slovenia probably facilitates the coordination of care, which is not the case in Belgium. The financing and organization of primary practices in Belgium was identified as a barrier to the implementation of task delegation between health professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study allowed formulating some important concepts for future healthcare for non-communicable diseases at the level of primary healthcare. The results could provide useful insights for other countries with similar health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":45127,"journal":{"name":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4b/1e/sjph-60-158.PMC8256765.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scaling-up an Integrated Care for Patients with Non-communicable Diseases: An Analysis of Healthcare Barriers and Facilitators in Slovenia and Belgium.\",\"authors\":\"Črt Zavrnik,&nbsp;Katrien Danhieux,&nbsp;Miriam Hurtado Monarres,&nbsp;Nataša Stojnić,&nbsp;Majda Mori Lukančič,&nbsp;Monika Martens,&nbsp;Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš,&nbsp;Edwin Wouters,&nbsp;Josefien van Olmen,&nbsp;Antonija Poplas-Susič\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sjph-2021-0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although the concept of integrated care for non-communicable diseases was introduced at the primary level to move from disease-centered to patient-centered care, it has only been partially implemented in European countries. The aim of this study was to identify and compare identified facilitators and barriers to scale-up this concept between Slovenia and Belgium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative study. Fifteen focus groups and fifty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders at the micro, meso and macro levels. In addition, data from two previously published studies were used for the analysis. Data collection and analysis was initially conducted at country level. Finally, the data was evaluated by a cross-country team to assess similarities and differences between countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four topics were identified in the study: patient-centered care, teamwork, coordination of care and task delegation. Despite the different contexts, true teamwork and patient-centered care are limited in both countries by hierarchies and a very heavily skewed medical approach. The organization of primary healthcare in Slovenia probably facilitates the coordination of care, which is not the case in Belgium. The financing and organization of primary practices in Belgium was identified as a barrier to the implementation of task delegation between health professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study allowed formulating some important concepts for future healthcare for non-communicable diseases at the level of primary healthcare. The results could provide useful insights for other countries with similar health systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zdravstveno Varstvo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4b/1e/sjph-60-158.PMC8256765.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zdravstveno Varstvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2021-0023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2021-0023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

导言:虽然在初级一级引入了非传染性疾病综合护理的概念,以便从以疾病为中心转向以患者为中心的护理,但在欧洲国家只部分实施了这一概念。本研究的目的是确定和比较斯洛文尼亚和比利时之间扩大这一概念的已确定的促进因素和障碍。方法:定性研究。在微观、中观和宏观层面与利益相关者进行了15个焦点小组和51个半结构化访谈。此外,还使用了先前发表的两项研究的数据进行分析。数据收集和分析最初是在国家一级进行的。最后,由一个跨国团队对数据进行评估,以评估各国之间的异同。结果:研究确定了四个主题:以患者为中心的护理、团队合作、护理协调和任务授权。尽管两国背景不同,但真正的团队合作和以病人为中心的护理在这两个国家都受到等级制度和严重偏颇的医疗方法的限制。斯洛文尼亚初级保健的组织可能促进了护理的协调,而比利时的情况并非如此。在比利时,初级实践的筹资和组织问题被认为是卫生专业人员之间执行任务授权的障碍。结论:这项研究有助于在初级卫生保健层面为未来非传染性疾病的卫生保健制定一些重要概念。研究结果可以为其他拥有类似卫生系统的国家提供有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scaling-up an Integrated Care for Patients with Non-communicable Diseases: An Analysis of Healthcare Barriers and Facilitators in Slovenia and Belgium.

Introduction: Although the concept of integrated care for non-communicable diseases was introduced at the primary level to move from disease-centered to patient-centered care, it has only been partially implemented in European countries. The aim of this study was to identify and compare identified facilitators and barriers to scale-up this concept between Slovenia and Belgium.

Methods: This was a qualitative study. Fifteen focus groups and fifty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders at the micro, meso and macro levels. In addition, data from two previously published studies were used for the analysis. Data collection and analysis was initially conducted at country level. Finally, the data was evaluated by a cross-country team to assess similarities and differences between countries.

Results: Four topics were identified in the study: patient-centered care, teamwork, coordination of care and task delegation. Despite the different contexts, true teamwork and patient-centered care are limited in both countries by hierarchies and a very heavily skewed medical approach. The organization of primary healthcare in Slovenia probably facilitates the coordination of care, which is not the case in Belgium. The financing and organization of primary practices in Belgium was identified as a barrier to the implementation of task delegation between health professionals.

Conclusions: This study allowed formulating some important concepts for future healthcare for non-communicable diseases at the level of primary healthcare. The results could provide useful insights for other countries with similar health systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zdravstveno Varstvo
Zdravstveno Varstvo PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信