后区短植入物的受试者内比较:长达10年的回顾性研究。

IF 2.7 3区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-25 DOI:10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.172

Douglas Blum Segalla, Eduardo Aydos Villarinho, André Ricardo Maia Correia, Álvaro Vigo, Rosemary Sadami Arai Shinkai

{"title":"后区短植入物的受试者内比较:长达10年的回顾性研究。","authors":"Douglas Blum Segalla, Eduardo Aydos Villarinho, André Ricardo Maia Correia, Álvaro Vigo, Rosemary Sadami Arai Shinkai","doi":"10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This intra-patient retrospective study of up to 10 years evaluated the clinical success and risk factors of 6- and 8-mm long implants and their respective prostheses.Materials and methods: The sample consisted of patients treated at a Military Polyclinic dental service, who received both 6- and 8-mm long tissue level implants in the posterior region of the same arch. Data were collected from the dental charts, clinical and radiographic exams, self-report of sleep bruxism, measurement of maximum occlusal force, and clinical crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio. Data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics with univariate and hierarchical multivariate models, at the 0.05 significance level.Results: The 30 patients (27 women) had 85 implants and 83 prostheses. Two implants were lost before prosthesis installation (implant survival: 97.6%). Ten events of prosthetic complication (screw tightening loss) occurred in five patients (success rate: 87.9%) in a single moment. Only the variable C/I ratio had a significant effect for repairable prosthesis complication (P<.05).Conclusion: The results suggest that 6- and 8-mm long implants have similar long-term clinical success for implants and prostheses.","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/d7/jap-13-172.PMC8250189.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A within-subject comparison of short implants in the posterior region: retrospective study of up to 10 years.\",\"authors\":\"Douglas Blum Segalla, Eduardo Aydos Villarinho, André Ricardo Maia Correia, Álvaro Vigo, Rosemary Sadami Arai Shinkai\",\"doi\":\"10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This intra-patient retrospective study of up to 10 years evaluated the clinical success and risk factors of 6- and 8-mm long implants and their respective prostheses.Materials and methods: The sample consisted of patients treated at a Military Polyclinic dental service, who received both 6- and 8-mm long tissue level implants in the posterior region of the same arch. Data were collected from the dental charts, clinical and radiographic exams, self-report of sleep bruxism, measurement of maximum occlusal force, and clinical crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio. Data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics with univariate and hierarchical multivariate models, at the 0.05 significance level.Results: The 30 patients (27 women) had 85 implants and 83 prostheses. Two implants were lost before prosthesis installation (implant survival: 97.6%). Ten events of prosthetic complication (screw tightening loss) occurred in five patients (success rate: 87.9%) in a single moment. Only the variable C/I ratio had a significant effect for repairable prosthesis complication (P<.05).Conclusion: The results suggest that 6- and 8-mm long implants have similar long-term clinical success for implants and prostheses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/d7/jap-13-172.PMC8250189.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.172\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:这项长达10年的患者回顾性研究评估了6毫米和8毫米长的种植体及其各自的假体的临床成功和危险因素。材料和方法:样本包括在军事综合牙科诊所接受治疗的患者，他们在同一弓的后区接受了6和8毫米长的组织水平种植体。数据收集自牙科图表、临床和放射检查、睡眠磨牙症自我报告、最大咬合力测量和临床冠与种植体(C/I)比。采用单变量和分层多变量模型对数据进行描述性和推断性统计分析，显著性水平为0.05。结果:30例患者(女性27例)种植体85枚，假体83枚。2个种植体在安装前丢失(种植体成活率:97.6%)。5例患者一次性发生10例假体并发症(螺钉松动)，成功率为87.9%。只有可变的C/I比率对可修复的假体并发症有显著影响(结论:结果表明，6 mm和8 mm长的假体在种植体和假体方面具有相似的长期临床成功。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

A within-subject comparison of short implants in the posterior region: retrospective study of up to 10 years.

查看原文本刊更多论文

A within-subject comparison of short implants in the posterior region: retrospective study of up to 10 years.

Purpose: This intra-patient retrospective study of up to 10 years evaluated the clinical success and risk factors of 6- and 8-mm long implants and their respective prostheses.

Materials and methods: The sample consisted of patients treated at a Military Polyclinic dental service, who received both 6- and 8-mm long tissue level implants in the posterior region of the same arch. Data were collected from the dental charts, clinical and radiographic exams, self-report of sleep bruxism, measurement of maximum occlusal force, and clinical crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio. Data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics with univariate and hierarchical multivariate models, at the 0.05 significance level.

Results: The 30 patients (27 women) had 85 implants and 83 prostheses. Two implants were lost before prosthesis installation (implant survival: 97.6%). Ten events of prosthetic complication (screw tightening loss) occurred in five patients (success rate: 87.9%) in a single moment. Only the variable C/I ratio had a significant effect for repairable prosthesis complication (P<.05).

Conclusion: The results suggest that 6- and 8-mm long implants have similar long-term clinical success for implants and prostheses.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

4.70

自引率

3.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics. This journal publishes • Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants. • Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics. • Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.