非处方COVID-19预防和治疗20周临床结果研究

IF 3.3 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Leon Margolin, Jeremy Luchins, Daniel Margolin, Michelle Margolin, Sanford Lefkowitz
{"title":"非处方COVID-19预防和治疗20周临床结果研究","authors":"Leon Margolin,&nbsp;Jeremy Luchins,&nbsp;Daniel Margolin,&nbsp;Michelle Margolin,&nbsp;Sanford Lefkowitz","doi":"10.1177/2515690X211026193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives and setting.: </strong>As the lethal COVID-19 pandemic enters its second year, the need for effective modalities of alleviation remains urgent. This includes modalities that can readily be used by the public to reduce disease spread and severity. Such preventive measures and early-stage treatments may temper the immediacy of demand for advanced anti-COVID measures (drugs, antibodies, vaccines) and help relieve strain also on other health system resources.</p><p><strong>Design and participants.: </strong>We present results of a clinical study with a multi-component OTC \"core formulation\" regimen used in a multiply exposed adult population. Analysis of clinical outcome data from our sample of over 100 subjects - comprised of roughly equal sized regimen-compliant (test) and non-compliant (control) groups meeting equivalent inclusion criteria - demonstrates a strong statistical significance in favor of use of the core formulations.</p><p><strong>Results.: </strong>While both groups were moderate in size, the difference between them in outcomes over the 20-week study period was large and stark: Just under 4% of the compliant test group presented flu-like symptoms, but none of the test group was COVID-positive; whereas 20% of the non-compliant control group presented flu-like symptoms, three-quarters of whom (15% overall of the control group) were COVID-positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.: </strong>Offering a low cost, readily implemented anti-viral approach, the study regimen may serve, at the least, as a stopgap modality and, perhaps, as a useful tool in combatting the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":15714,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515690X211026193","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"20-Week Study of Clinical Outcomes of Over-the-Counter COVID-19 Prophylaxis and Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Leon Margolin,&nbsp;Jeremy Luchins,&nbsp;Daniel Margolin,&nbsp;Michelle Margolin,&nbsp;Sanford Lefkowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2515690X211026193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives and setting.: </strong>As the lethal COVID-19 pandemic enters its second year, the need for effective modalities of alleviation remains urgent. This includes modalities that can readily be used by the public to reduce disease spread and severity. Such preventive measures and early-stage treatments may temper the immediacy of demand for advanced anti-COVID measures (drugs, antibodies, vaccines) and help relieve strain also on other health system resources.</p><p><strong>Design and participants.: </strong>We present results of a clinical study with a multi-component OTC \\\"core formulation\\\" regimen used in a multiply exposed adult population. Analysis of clinical outcome data from our sample of over 100 subjects - comprised of roughly equal sized regimen-compliant (test) and non-compliant (control) groups meeting equivalent inclusion criteria - demonstrates a strong statistical significance in favor of use of the core formulations.</p><p><strong>Results.: </strong>While both groups were moderate in size, the difference between them in outcomes over the 20-week study period was large and stark: Just under 4% of the compliant test group presented flu-like symptoms, but none of the test group was COVID-positive; whereas 20% of the non-compliant control group presented flu-like symptoms, three-quarters of whom (15% overall of the control group) were COVID-positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.: </strong>Offering a low cost, readily implemented anti-viral approach, the study regimen may serve, at the least, as a stopgap modality and, perhaps, as a useful tool in combatting the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515690X211026193\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515690X211026193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515690X211026193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

目标和设定。随着致命的COVID-19大流行进入第二年,仍然迫切需要有效的缓解方式。这包括公众可以轻易使用的方式,以减少疾病传播和严重程度。此类预防措施和早期治疗可能会缓和对先进抗疫措施(药物、抗体、疫苗)的迫切需求,并有助于缓解其他卫生系统资源的压力。设计和参与者。我们介绍了一项临床研究的结果,该研究使用了一种多组分OTC“核心配方”方案,用于多次暴露的成人人群。我们对100多名受试者样本的临床结果数据进行了分析,这些受试者包括规模大致相等的符合相同纳入标准的方案依从组(测试组)和不依从组(对照组),结果表明,支持使用核心配方的统计意义很强。结果:虽然两组的规模都不大,但在20周的研究期间,两组之间的结果差异很大。只有不到4%的依从测试组出现流感样症状,但测试组都没有covid - 19阳性;而不遵守规定的对照组中有20%出现流感样症状,其中四分之三(占对照组总数的15%)呈新冠病毒阳性。该研究方案提供了一种成本低、易于实施的抗病毒方法,至少可以作为一种权宜之计,或许还可以作为防治大流行病的一种有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

20-Week Study of Clinical Outcomes of Over-the-Counter COVID-19 Prophylaxis and Treatment.

20-Week Study of Clinical Outcomes of Over-the-Counter COVID-19 Prophylaxis and Treatment.

20-Week Study of Clinical Outcomes of Over-the-Counter COVID-19 Prophylaxis and Treatment.

20-Week Study of Clinical Outcomes of Over-the-Counter COVID-19 Prophylaxis and Treatment.

Objectives and setting.: As the lethal COVID-19 pandemic enters its second year, the need for effective modalities of alleviation remains urgent. This includes modalities that can readily be used by the public to reduce disease spread and severity. Such preventive measures and early-stage treatments may temper the immediacy of demand for advanced anti-COVID measures (drugs, antibodies, vaccines) and help relieve strain also on other health system resources.

Design and participants.: We present results of a clinical study with a multi-component OTC "core formulation" regimen used in a multiply exposed adult population. Analysis of clinical outcome data from our sample of over 100 subjects - comprised of roughly equal sized regimen-compliant (test) and non-compliant (control) groups meeting equivalent inclusion criteria - demonstrates a strong statistical significance in favor of use of the core formulations.

Results.: While both groups were moderate in size, the difference between them in outcomes over the 20-week study period was large and stark: Just under 4% of the compliant test group presented flu-like symptoms, but none of the test group was COVID-positive; whereas 20% of the non-compliant control group presented flu-like symptoms, three-quarters of whom (15% overall of the control group) were COVID-positive.

Conclusions.: Offering a low cost, readily implemented anti-viral approach, the study regimen may serve, at the least, as a stopgap modality and, perhaps, as a useful tool in combatting the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine
Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信