MIPAM试验-动机性访谈和身体活动监测以提高老年人的日常身体活动水平-一项随机对照试验。

IF 3.7 1区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Rasmus Tolstrup Larsen, Christoffer Bruun Korfitsen, Camilla Keller, Jan Christensen, Henning Boje Andersen, Carsten Juhl, Henning Langberg
{"title":"MIPAM试验-动机性访谈和身体活动监测以提高老年人的日常身体活动水平-一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Rasmus Tolstrup Larsen,&nbsp;Christoffer Bruun Korfitsen,&nbsp;Camilla Keller,&nbsp;Jan Christensen,&nbsp;Henning Boje Andersen,&nbsp;Carsten Juhl,&nbsp;Henning Langberg","doi":"10.1186/s11556-021-00269-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One in four older adults in Denmark and almost half of the very old above 75 do not meet the World Health Organization's recommendations for a minimum of physical activity (PA). A cost-efficient and effective way to increase focus on and motivation for daily walking might be to use Physical Activity Monitors (PAMs) in combination with behavioural change intervention. Thus, the objective of this randomized controlled study was to investigate the effect of Motivational Interviewing (MI) as an add-on intervention to a PAM-based intervention measured in community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This two-arm parallel group randomized controlled effectiveness trial compared a 12-weeks PAM-based intervention with additional MI (PAM+MI group) with a PAM-based intervention alone (PAM group). The primary outcome, average daily step count, was analysed with a linear regression model, adjusted for sex and baseline daily step count. Following the intention-to-treat principle, multiple imputation based on baseline step count, sex and age was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 38 participants were randomized to the PAM intervention and 32 to the PAM+MI intervention arm. During the intervention period, PAM+MI participants walked on average 909 more steps per day than PAM participants, however insignificant (95%CI: - 71; 1889) and reported 2.3 points less on the UCLA Loneliness Scale (95%CI: - 4.5; - 1.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of MI, in addition to a PAM-based intervention among older adults in PA promoting interventions hold a potential clinically relevant effect on physical activity and should thus be investigated further with adequately powered RCTs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was pre-registered in the clinicaltrials.gov database with identifier: NCT03906162 .</p>","PeriodicalId":50477,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s11556-021-00269-7","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The MIPAM trial - motivational interviewing and physical activity monitoring to enhance the daily level of physical activity among older adults - a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rasmus Tolstrup Larsen,&nbsp;Christoffer Bruun Korfitsen,&nbsp;Camilla Keller,&nbsp;Jan Christensen,&nbsp;Henning Boje Andersen,&nbsp;Carsten Juhl,&nbsp;Henning Langberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s11556-021-00269-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One in four older adults in Denmark and almost half of the very old above 75 do not meet the World Health Organization's recommendations for a minimum of physical activity (PA). A cost-efficient and effective way to increase focus on and motivation for daily walking might be to use Physical Activity Monitors (PAMs) in combination with behavioural change intervention. Thus, the objective of this randomized controlled study was to investigate the effect of Motivational Interviewing (MI) as an add-on intervention to a PAM-based intervention measured in community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This two-arm parallel group randomized controlled effectiveness trial compared a 12-weeks PAM-based intervention with additional MI (PAM+MI group) with a PAM-based intervention alone (PAM group). The primary outcome, average daily step count, was analysed with a linear regression model, adjusted for sex and baseline daily step count. Following the intention-to-treat principle, multiple imputation based on baseline step count, sex and age was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 38 participants were randomized to the PAM intervention and 32 to the PAM+MI intervention arm. During the intervention period, PAM+MI participants walked on average 909 more steps per day than PAM participants, however insignificant (95%CI: - 71; 1889) and reported 2.3 points less on the UCLA Loneliness Scale (95%CI: - 4.5; - 1.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of MI, in addition to a PAM-based intervention among older adults in PA promoting interventions hold a potential clinically relevant effect on physical activity and should thus be investigated further with adequately powered RCTs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was pre-registered in the clinicaltrials.gov database with identifier: NCT03906162 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s11556-021-00269-7\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-021-00269-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-021-00269-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:丹麦四分之一的老年人和几乎一半的75岁以上的老人没有达到世界卫生组织关于最低体力活动(PA)的建议。增加对日常步行的关注和动力的一种经济有效的方法可能是使用身体活动监测仪(PAMs)与行为改变干预相结合。因此,这项随机对照研究的目的是调查动机访谈(MI)作为基于pam的干预措施的附加干预措施在社区居住的老年人中的效果。方法:这项双臂平行组随机对照有效性试验比较了为期12周的PAM-based intervention with additional MI (PAM+MI组)和单独PAM-based intervention (PAM组)。主要结果,平均每日步数,用线性回归模型进行分析,调整性别和基线每日步数。遵循意向治疗原则,基于基线步数、性别和年龄进行多重归算。结果:共有38名参与者被随机分配到PAM干预组,32名参与者被随机分配到PAM+MI干预组。在干预期间,PAM+MI参与者比PAM参与者平均每天多走909步,但不显著(95%CI: - 71;1889年),在UCLA孤独量表上少了2.3分(95%置信区间:- 4.5;- 1.24)。结论:在PA促进干预的老年人中,除了基于pam的干预外,使用心肌梗死对身体活动有潜在的临床相关影响,因此应该通过充分有力的随机对照试验进一步研究。试验注册:本研究已在clinicaltrials.gov数据库中预注册,识别码为NCT03906162。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The MIPAM trial - motivational interviewing and physical activity monitoring to enhance the daily level of physical activity among older adults - a randomized controlled trial.

The MIPAM trial - motivational interviewing and physical activity monitoring to enhance the daily level of physical activity among older adults - a randomized controlled trial.

The MIPAM trial - motivational interviewing and physical activity monitoring to enhance the daily level of physical activity among older adults - a randomized controlled trial.

The MIPAM trial - motivational interviewing and physical activity monitoring to enhance the daily level of physical activity among older adults - a randomized controlled trial.

Background: One in four older adults in Denmark and almost half of the very old above 75 do not meet the World Health Organization's recommendations for a minimum of physical activity (PA). A cost-efficient and effective way to increase focus on and motivation for daily walking might be to use Physical Activity Monitors (PAMs) in combination with behavioural change intervention. Thus, the objective of this randomized controlled study was to investigate the effect of Motivational Interviewing (MI) as an add-on intervention to a PAM-based intervention measured in community-dwelling older adults.

Methods: This two-arm parallel group randomized controlled effectiveness trial compared a 12-weeks PAM-based intervention with additional MI (PAM+MI group) with a PAM-based intervention alone (PAM group). The primary outcome, average daily step count, was analysed with a linear regression model, adjusted for sex and baseline daily step count. Following the intention-to-treat principle, multiple imputation based on baseline step count, sex and age was performed.

Results: In total, 38 participants were randomized to the PAM intervention and 32 to the PAM+MI intervention arm. During the intervention period, PAM+MI participants walked on average 909 more steps per day than PAM participants, however insignificant (95%CI: - 71; 1889) and reported 2.3 points less on the UCLA Loneliness Scale (95%CI: - 4.5; - 1.24).

Conclusion: The use of MI, in addition to a PAM-based intervention among older adults in PA promoting interventions hold a potential clinically relevant effect on physical activity and should thus be investigated further with adequately powered RCTs.

Trial registration: This study was pre-registered in the clinicaltrials.gov database with identifier: NCT03906162 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (EURAPA) disseminates research on the biomedical and behavioural aspects of physical activity and aging. The main issues addressed by EURAPA are the impact of physical activity or exercise on cognitive, physical, and psycho-social functioning of older people, physical activity patterns in advanced age, and the relationship between physical activity and health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信