奈莫单抗治疗成人特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性。

IF 4.8
N Freemantle, C Piketty
{"title":"奈莫单抗治疗成人特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性。","authors":"N Freemantle, C Piketty","doi":"10.18176/jiaci.0727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To the Editor: We were interested to read the meta-analysis by Xuemin et al [1] on the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab for treatment of adult atopic dermatitis. This is an important area, and an overview of the available data is timely. We concur with the conclusions of the authors that nemolizumab is a promising treatment, and Galderma is currently undertaking further phase 3 clinical trials to gather new data. On one important point, however, we struggle to reconcile the results and conclusions of the review with our knowledge of the published data. The authors comment that the 60-mg Q4w regimen is likely to be optimal. The only complete phase 3 trial that has compared that dose [2] on a proper likefor-like basis with a lower dose currently in late development (30 mg Q4w) is actually in favor of the lower dose. The percent change in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) (from baseline to week 16) for the 30-mg Q4w dose vs placebo (difference, –23.7; 95%CI, –8.9 to –38.5; P=.002) was reported in the phase 2b trial of Silverberg et al [3]. The treatment effect observed with EASI was greater than that observed with the 60-mg Q4w dose in the phase 3 trial by Kabashima et al [2] (difference, –12.6; 95%CI, –1.3 to –24.0). Using the method of Bucher et al [4] to undertake a formal indirect comparison, we observed a numerically greater benefit for 30 mg Q4w (difference, –11.1; 95%CI, 7.6 to –29.8) (Figure). The 30-mg dose is under evaluation in 2 pivotal phase 3 trials (NCT03989349 and NCT03985943), and analysis of the outcomes of both will help us resolve this important question. We do not recognize some of the data included by the reviewers in their work; for example, the results above for Silverberg et al [3] derived from the clinical study report are not reflected in the report by Xuemin et al [1]. This is troubling. While the overall conclusions are supported by individual trials, the dosage conclusions do not reflect current data.","PeriodicalId":520676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":"528-529"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab for Treatment of Adult Atopic Dermatitis.\",\"authors\":\"N Freemantle, C Piketty\",\"doi\":\"10.18176/jiaci.0727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To the Editor: We were interested to read the meta-analysis by Xuemin et al [1] on the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab for treatment of adult atopic dermatitis. This is an important area, and an overview of the available data is timely. We concur with the conclusions of the authors that nemolizumab is a promising treatment, and Galderma is currently undertaking further phase 3 clinical trials to gather new data. On one important point, however, we struggle to reconcile the results and conclusions of the review with our knowledge of the published data. The authors comment that the 60-mg Q4w regimen is likely to be optimal. The only complete phase 3 trial that has compared that dose [2] on a proper likefor-like basis with a lower dose currently in late development (30 mg Q4w) is actually in favor of the lower dose. The percent change in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) (from baseline to week 16) for the 30-mg Q4w dose vs placebo (difference, –23.7; 95%CI, –8.9 to –38.5; P=.002) was reported in the phase 2b trial of Silverberg et al [3]. The treatment effect observed with EASI was greater than that observed with the 60-mg Q4w dose in the phase 3 trial by Kabashima et al [2] (difference, –12.6; 95%CI, –1.3 to –24.0). Using the method of Bucher et al [4] to undertake a formal indirect comparison, we observed a numerically greater benefit for 30 mg Q4w (difference, –11.1; 95%CI, 7.6 to –29.8) (Figure). The 30-mg dose is under evaluation in 2 pivotal phase 3 trials (NCT03989349 and NCT03985943), and analysis of the outcomes of both will help us resolve this important question. We do not recognize some of the data included by the reviewers in their work; for example, the results above for Silverberg et al [3] derived from the clinical study report are not reflected in the report by Xuemin et al [1]. This is troubling. While the overall conclusions are supported by individual trials, the dosage conclusions do not reflect current data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":520676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"528-529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.0727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.0727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab for Treatment of Adult Atopic Dermatitis.
To the Editor: We were interested to read the meta-analysis by Xuemin et al [1] on the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab for treatment of adult atopic dermatitis. This is an important area, and an overview of the available data is timely. We concur with the conclusions of the authors that nemolizumab is a promising treatment, and Galderma is currently undertaking further phase 3 clinical trials to gather new data. On one important point, however, we struggle to reconcile the results and conclusions of the review with our knowledge of the published data. The authors comment that the 60-mg Q4w regimen is likely to be optimal. The only complete phase 3 trial that has compared that dose [2] on a proper likefor-like basis with a lower dose currently in late development (30 mg Q4w) is actually in favor of the lower dose. The percent change in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) (from baseline to week 16) for the 30-mg Q4w dose vs placebo (difference, –23.7; 95%CI, –8.9 to –38.5; P=.002) was reported in the phase 2b trial of Silverberg et al [3]. The treatment effect observed with EASI was greater than that observed with the 60-mg Q4w dose in the phase 3 trial by Kabashima et al [2] (difference, –12.6; 95%CI, –1.3 to –24.0). Using the method of Bucher et al [4] to undertake a formal indirect comparison, we observed a numerically greater benefit for 30 mg Q4w (difference, –11.1; 95%CI, 7.6 to –29.8) (Figure). The 30-mg dose is under evaluation in 2 pivotal phase 3 trials (NCT03989349 and NCT03985943), and analysis of the outcomes of both will help us resolve this important question. We do not recognize some of the data included by the reviewers in their work; for example, the results above for Silverberg et al [3] derived from the clinical study report are not reflected in the report by Xuemin et al [1]. This is troubling. While the overall conclusions are supported by individual trials, the dosage conclusions do not reflect current data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信