氨基酸PET与先进和新兴的神经肿瘤成像MRI技术的比较:最近研究的系统回顾。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2021-01-20 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/8874078
Brittany M Stopa, Csaba Juhász, Sandeep Mittal
{"title":"氨基酸PET与先进和新兴的神经肿瘤成像MRI技术的比较:最近研究的系统回顾。","authors":"Brittany M Stopa,&nbsp;Csaba Juhász,&nbsp;Sandeep Mittal","doi":"10.1155/2021/8874078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Standard neuroimaging protocols for brain tumors have well-known limitations. The clinical use of additional modalities including amino acid PET (aaPET) and advanced MRI (aMRI) techniques (including DWI, PWI, and MRS) is emerging in response to the need for more accurate detection of brain tumors. In this systematic review of the past 2 years of the literature, we discuss the most recent studies that directly compare or combine aaPET and aMRI for brain tumor imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed search was conducted for human studies incorporating both aaPET and aMRI and published between July 2018 and August 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 studies were found in the study period. Recent studies of aaPET with DWI showed a superiority of MET, FET, FDOPA, and AMT PET for detecting tumor, predicting recurrence, diagnosing progression, and predicting survival. Combining modalities further improved performance. Comparisons of aaPET with PWI showed mixed results about spatial correlation. However, both modalities were able to detect high-grade tumors, identify tumor recurrence, differentiate recurrence from treatment effects, and predict survival. aaPET performed better on these measures than PWI, but when combined, they had the strongest results. Studies of aaPET with MRS demonstrated that both modalities have diagnostic potential but MET PET and FDOPA PET performed better than MRS. MRS suffered from some data quality issues that limited analysis in two studies, and, in one study that combined modalities, overall performance actually decreased. Four recent studies compared aaPET with emerging MRI approaches (such as CEST imaging, MR fingerprinting, and SISTINA), but the initial results remain inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>aaPET outperformed the aMRI imaging techniques in most recent studies. DWI and PWI added meaningful complementary data, and the combination of aaPET with aMRI yielded the best results in most studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18855,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8205602/pdf/","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Amino Acid PET to Advanced and Emerging MRI Techniques for Neurooncology Imaging: A Systematic Review of the Recent Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Brittany M Stopa,&nbsp;Csaba Juhász,&nbsp;Sandeep Mittal\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/8874078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Standard neuroimaging protocols for brain tumors have well-known limitations. The clinical use of additional modalities including amino acid PET (aaPET) and advanced MRI (aMRI) techniques (including DWI, PWI, and MRS) is emerging in response to the need for more accurate detection of brain tumors. In this systematic review of the past 2 years of the literature, we discuss the most recent studies that directly compare or combine aaPET and aMRI for brain tumor imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed search was conducted for human studies incorporating both aaPET and aMRI and published between July 2018 and August 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 studies were found in the study period. Recent studies of aaPET with DWI showed a superiority of MET, FET, FDOPA, and AMT PET for detecting tumor, predicting recurrence, diagnosing progression, and predicting survival. Combining modalities further improved performance. Comparisons of aaPET with PWI showed mixed results about spatial correlation. However, both modalities were able to detect high-grade tumors, identify tumor recurrence, differentiate recurrence from treatment effects, and predict survival. aaPET performed better on these measures than PWI, but when combined, they had the strongest results. Studies of aaPET with MRS demonstrated that both modalities have diagnostic potential but MET PET and FDOPA PET performed better than MRS. MRS suffered from some data quality issues that limited analysis in two studies, and, in one study that combined modalities, overall performance actually decreased. Four recent studies compared aaPET with emerging MRI approaches (such as CEST imaging, MR fingerprinting, and SISTINA), but the initial results remain inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>aaPET outperformed the aMRI imaging techniques in most recent studies. DWI and PWI added meaningful complementary data, and the combination of aaPET with aMRI yielded the best results in most studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8205602/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8874078\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8874078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

导读:脑肿瘤的标准神经成像方案有众所周知的局限性。为了满足更准确地检测脑肿瘤的需求,临床使用了包括氨基酸PET (aaPET)和高级MRI (aMRI)技术(包括DWI、PWI和MRS)在内的其他方法。在这篇对过去2年文献的系统回顾中,我们讨论了直接比较或联合aaPET和aMRI用于脑肿瘤成像的最新研究。方法:对2018年7月至2020年8月期间发表的包含aaPET和aMRI的人类研究进行PubMed检索。结果:研究期间共发现22项研究。最近对aaPET与DWI的研究表明MET、FET、FDOPA和AMT PET在检测肿瘤、预测复发、诊断进展和预测生存方面具有优势。组合方式进一步提高了性能。aaPET与PWI的空间相关性比较结果不一。然而,这两种方法都能够检测高级别肿瘤,识别肿瘤复发,区分复发和治疗效果,并预测生存。aaPET在这些指标上比PWI表现更好,但当两者结合起来时,它们的效果最强。aaPET与MRS的研究表明,两种方法都有诊断潜力,但MET PET和FDOPA PET的表现优于MRS。MRS在两项研究中存在一些数据质量问题,限制了分析,而且,在一项综合方法的研究中,总体表现实际上有所下降。最近的四项研究将aaPET与新兴的MRI方法(如CEST成像、MR指纹和SISTINA)进行了比较,但初步结果仍不确定。结论:在最近的研究中,aaPET优于aMRI成像技术。DWI和PWI提供了有意义的补充数据,aaPET联合aMRI在大多数研究中获得了最好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Amino Acid PET to Advanced and Emerging MRI Techniques for Neurooncology Imaging: A Systematic Review of the Recent Studies.

Comparison of Amino Acid PET to Advanced and Emerging MRI Techniques for Neurooncology Imaging: A Systematic Review of the Recent Studies.

Comparison of Amino Acid PET to Advanced and Emerging MRI Techniques for Neurooncology Imaging: A Systematic Review of the Recent Studies.

Comparison of Amino Acid PET to Advanced and Emerging MRI Techniques for Neurooncology Imaging: A Systematic Review of the Recent Studies.

Introduction: Standard neuroimaging protocols for brain tumors have well-known limitations. The clinical use of additional modalities including amino acid PET (aaPET) and advanced MRI (aMRI) techniques (including DWI, PWI, and MRS) is emerging in response to the need for more accurate detection of brain tumors. In this systematic review of the past 2 years of the literature, we discuss the most recent studies that directly compare or combine aaPET and aMRI for brain tumor imaging.

Methods: A PubMed search was conducted for human studies incorporating both aaPET and aMRI and published between July 2018 and August 2020.

Results: A total of 22 studies were found in the study period. Recent studies of aaPET with DWI showed a superiority of MET, FET, FDOPA, and AMT PET for detecting tumor, predicting recurrence, diagnosing progression, and predicting survival. Combining modalities further improved performance. Comparisons of aaPET with PWI showed mixed results about spatial correlation. However, both modalities were able to detect high-grade tumors, identify tumor recurrence, differentiate recurrence from treatment effects, and predict survival. aaPET performed better on these measures than PWI, but when combined, they had the strongest results. Studies of aaPET with MRS demonstrated that both modalities have diagnostic potential but MET PET and FDOPA PET performed better than MRS. MRS suffered from some data quality issues that limited analysis in two studies, and, in one study that combined modalities, overall performance actually decreased. Four recent studies compared aaPET with emerging MRI approaches (such as CEST imaging, MR fingerprinting, and SISTINA), but the initial results remain inconclusive.

Conclusions: aaPET outperformed the aMRI imaging techniques in most recent studies. DWI and PWI added meaningful complementary data, and the combination of aaPET with aMRI yielded the best results in most studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Imaging
Molecular Imaging Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
自引率
3.60%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Molecular Imaging is a peer-reviewed, open access journal highlighting the breadth of molecular imaging research from basic science to preclinical studies to human applications. This serves both the scientific and clinical communities by disseminating novel results and concepts relevant to the biological study of normal and disease processes in both basic and translational studies ranging from mice to humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信