大麻在PTSD治疗中的应用:系统综述。

IF 3.1 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
AIMS Neuroscience Pub Date : 2021-05-13 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.3934/Neuroscience.2021022
Yasir Rehman, Amreen Saini, Sarina Huang, Emma Sood, Ravneet Gill, Sezgi Yanikomeroglu
{"title":"大麻在PTSD治疗中的应用:系统综述。","authors":"Yasir Rehman,&nbsp;Amreen Saini,&nbsp;Sarina Huang,&nbsp;Emma Sood,&nbsp;Ravneet Gill,&nbsp;Sezgi Yanikomeroglu","doi":"10.3934/Neuroscience.2021022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Existing reviews exploring cannabis effectiveness have numerous limitations including narrow search strategies. We systematically explored cannabis effects on PTSD symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and return to work (RTW). We also investigated harm outcomes such as adverse effects and dropouts due to adverse effects, inefficacy, and all-cause dropout rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and PubMed databases, yielded 1 eligible RCT and 10 observational studies (n = 4672). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool and ROBINS-I.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence from the included studies was mainly based on non-randomized studies with no comparators. Results from unpooled, high RoB studies showed that cannabis was associated with a reduction in overall PTSD symptoms and improved QOL. Dry mouth, headaches, and psychoactive effects such as agitation and euphoria were the commonly reported adverse effects. In most studies, cannabis was well tolerated, but small proportions of patients experienced a worsening of PTSD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence in the current study primarily stems from low quality and high RoB observational studies. Further RCTs investigating cannabis effects on PTSD treatment should be conducted with larger sample sizes and explore a broader range of patient-important outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7732,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Neuroscience","volume":"8 3","pages":"414-434"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8222769/pdf/","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannabis in the management of PTSD: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Yasir Rehman,&nbsp;Amreen Saini,&nbsp;Sarina Huang,&nbsp;Emma Sood,&nbsp;Ravneet Gill,&nbsp;Sezgi Yanikomeroglu\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/Neuroscience.2021022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Existing reviews exploring cannabis effectiveness have numerous limitations including narrow search strategies. We systematically explored cannabis effects on PTSD symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and return to work (RTW). We also investigated harm outcomes such as adverse effects and dropouts due to adverse effects, inefficacy, and all-cause dropout rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and PubMed databases, yielded 1 eligible RCT and 10 observational studies (n = 4672). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool and ROBINS-I.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence from the included studies was mainly based on non-randomized studies with no comparators. Results from unpooled, high RoB studies showed that cannabis was associated with a reduction in overall PTSD symptoms and improved QOL. Dry mouth, headaches, and psychoactive effects such as agitation and euphoria were the commonly reported adverse effects. In most studies, cannabis was well tolerated, but small proportions of patients experienced a worsening of PTSD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence in the current study primarily stems from low quality and high RoB observational studies. Further RCTs investigating cannabis effects on PTSD treatment should be conducted with larger sample sizes and explore a broader range of patient-important outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIMS Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"414-434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8222769/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIMS Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2021022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2021022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

现有的评论探索大麻的有效性有许多局限性,包括狭窄的搜索策略。我们系统地探讨了大麻对PTSD症状、生活质量(QOL)和重返工作(RTW)的影响。我们还调查了危害结果,如不良反应和因不良反应而退学、无效和全因退学率。方法:我们在MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycInfo、CINAHL、Web of Science、CENTRAL和PubMed数据库中检索,获得1项符合条件的RCT和10项观察性研究(n = 4672)。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险(RoB)。结果:纳入研究的证据主要基于没有比较物的非随机研究。非汇总的高RoB研究结果表明,大麻与总体创伤后应激障碍症状的减少和生活质量的改善有关。口干舌燥、头痛和精神反应,如躁动和兴奋是常见的不良反应。在大多数研究中,大麻耐受性良好,但一小部分患者经历了PTSD症状的恶化。结论:目前研究中的证据主要来自低质量和高RoB的观察性研究。进一步研究大麻对创伤后应激障碍治疗效果的随机对照试验应该以更大的样本量进行,并探索更广泛的对患者重要的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cannabis in the management of PTSD: a systematic review.

Cannabis in the management of PTSD: a systematic review.

Introduction: Existing reviews exploring cannabis effectiveness have numerous limitations including narrow search strategies. We systematically explored cannabis effects on PTSD symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and return to work (RTW). We also investigated harm outcomes such as adverse effects and dropouts due to adverse effects, inefficacy, and all-cause dropout rates.

Methods: Our search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and PubMed databases, yielded 1 eligible RCT and 10 observational studies (n = 4672). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool and ROBINS-I.

Results: Evidence from the included studies was mainly based on non-randomized studies with no comparators. Results from unpooled, high RoB studies showed that cannabis was associated with a reduction in overall PTSD symptoms and improved QOL. Dry mouth, headaches, and psychoactive effects such as agitation and euphoria were the commonly reported adverse effects. In most studies, cannabis was well tolerated, but small proportions of patients experienced a worsening of PTSD symptoms.

Conclusion: Evidence in the current study primarily stems from low quality and high RoB observational studies. Further RCTs investigating cannabis effects on PTSD treatment should be conducted with larger sample sizes and explore a broader range of patient-important outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIMS Neuroscience
AIMS Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: AIMS Neuroscience is an international Open Access journal devoted to publishing peer-reviewed, high quality, original papers from all areas in the field of neuroscience. The primary focus is to provide a forum in which to expedite the speed with which theoretical neuroscience progresses toward generating testable hypotheses. In the presence of current and developing technology that offers unprecedented access to functions of the nervous system at all levels, the journal is designed to serve the role of providing the widest variety of the best theoretical views leading to suggested studies. Single blind peer review is provided for all articles and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信