两岁以下儿童轻度至中度急性细支气管炎的动态胸部物理治疗-一项随机对照试验。

Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-31 DOI:10.1142/S1013702521500098
Frederico Ramos Pinto, Ana Silva Alexandrino, Liane Correia-Costa, Inês Azevedo
{"title":"两岁以下儿童轻度至中度急性细支气管炎的动态胸部物理治疗-一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Frederico Ramos Pinto,&nbsp;Ana Silva Alexandrino,&nbsp;Liane Correia-Costa,&nbsp;Inês Azevedo","doi":"10.1142/S1013702521500098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the role of a chest physiotherapy (CP) intervention to no intervention on the respiratory status of children under two years of age, with mild-to-moderate bronchiolitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Out of 80 eligible children observed in the Emergency Room, 45 children completed the study with 28 randomized to the intervention group and 17 to the control group. The intervention protocol, applied in an ambulatory setting, consisted of combined techniques of passive prolonged slow expiration, rhinopharyngeal clearance and provoked cough. The control group was assessed with no chest physiotherapy intervention. The efficacy of chest physiotherapy was assessed using the Kristjansson Respiratory Score at the admission and discharge of the visit to the Emergency Room and during clinical visits at day 7 and day 15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant improvement in the Kristjansson Respiratory Score in the intervention group compared to the control group at day 15 [1.2 (1.5) versus 0.3 (0.5); <math><mi>p</mi></math> -value <math><mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>005</mn></math> , in the control and intervention groups, respectively], with a mean difference (95% CI) of <math><mo>-</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>9</mn></math> ( <math><mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>6</mn></math> to <math><mo>-</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>3</mn></math> ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chest physiotherapy had a positive impact on the respiratory status of children with mild-to-moderate bronchiolitis.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04260919.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/38/e3/hkpj-41-099.PMC8221980.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambulatory chest physiotherapy in mild-to-moderate acute bronchiolitis in children under two years of age - A randomized control trial.\",\"authors\":\"Frederico Ramos Pinto,&nbsp;Ana Silva Alexandrino,&nbsp;Liane Correia-Costa,&nbsp;Inês Azevedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S1013702521500098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the role of a chest physiotherapy (CP) intervention to no intervention on the respiratory status of children under two years of age, with mild-to-moderate bronchiolitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Out of 80 eligible children observed in the Emergency Room, 45 children completed the study with 28 randomized to the intervention group and 17 to the control group. The intervention protocol, applied in an ambulatory setting, consisted of combined techniques of passive prolonged slow expiration, rhinopharyngeal clearance and provoked cough. The control group was assessed with no chest physiotherapy intervention. The efficacy of chest physiotherapy was assessed using the Kristjansson Respiratory Score at the admission and discharge of the visit to the Emergency Room and during clinical visits at day 7 and day 15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant improvement in the Kristjansson Respiratory Score in the intervention group compared to the control group at day 15 [1.2 (1.5) versus 0.3 (0.5); <math><mi>p</mi></math> -value <math><mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>005</mn></math> , in the control and intervention groups, respectively], with a mean difference (95% CI) of <math><mo>-</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>9</mn></math> ( <math><mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>6</mn></math> to <math><mo>-</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>3</mn></math> ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chest physiotherapy had a positive impact on the respiratory status of children with mild-to-moderate bronchiolitis.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04260919.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/38/e3/hkpj-41-099.PMC8221980.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702521500098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702521500098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较胸部物理治疗(CP)干预与不干预对两岁以下轻度至中度毛细支气管炎儿童呼吸状态的作用。方法:在急诊室观察的80名符合条件的儿童中,45名儿童完成了研究,其中28名随机分为干预组,17名随机分为对照组。干预方案,应用于门诊设置,包括联合技术被动延长缓慢呼气,鼻咽清除和诱发咳嗽。对照组不进行胸部物理治疗干预。使用Kristjansson呼吸评分在急诊室入院和出院时以及第7天和第15天的临床就诊时评估胸部物理治疗的疗效。结果:与对照组相比,干预组在第15天的Kristjansson呼吸评分有显著改善[1.2(1.5)对0.3 (0.5);P -value = 0。[0.05],平均差异(95% CI)为- 0。9 (- 1)6到- 0。3)。结论:胸部物理治疗对轻中度毛细支气管炎患儿呼吸状态有积极影响。临床试验注册:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04260919。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ambulatory chest physiotherapy in mild-to-moderate acute bronchiolitis in children under two years of age - A randomized control trial.

Ambulatory chest physiotherapy in mild-to-moderate acute bronchiolitis in children under two years of age - A randomized control trial.

Ambulatory chest physiotherapy in mild-to-moderate acute bronchiolitis in children under two years of age - A randomized control trial.

分享
查看原文
Ambulatory chest physiotherapy in mild-to-moderate acute bronchiolitis in children under two years of age - A randomized control trial.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the role of a chest physiotherapy (CP) intervention to no intervention on the respiratory status of children under two years of age, with mild-to-moderate bronchiolitis.

Methods: Out of 80 eligible children observed in the Emergency Room, 45 children completed the study with 28 randomized to the intervention group and 17 to the control group. The intervention protocol, applied in an ambulatory setting, consisted of combined techniques of passive prolonged slow expiration, rhinopharyngeal clearance and provoked cough. The control group was assessed with no chest physiotherapy intervention. The efficacy of chest physiotherapy was assessed using the Kristjansson Respiratory Score at the admission and discharge of the visit to the Emergency Room and during clinical visits at day 7 and day 15.

Results: There was a significant improvement in the Kristjansson Respiratory Score in the intervention group compared to the control group at day 15 [1.2 (1.5) versus 0.3 (0.5); p -value = 0 . 005 , in the control and intervention groups, respectively], with a mean difference (95% CI) of - 0 . 9 ( - 1 . 6 to - 0 . 3 ).

Conclusion: Chest physiotherapy had a positive impact on the respiratory status of children with mild-to-moderate bronchiolitis.

Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04260919.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信