加拿大临床科学家实习生的国际培训考虑-一项全国性调查。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Adam Pietrobon, Elina K Cook, Charles Yin, Derek C H Chan, Tina B Marvasti
{"title":"加拿大临床科学家实习生的国际培训考虑-一项全国性调查。","authors":"Adam Pietrobon,&nbsp;Elina K Cook,&nbsp;Charles Yin,&nbsp;Derek C H Chan,&nbsp;Tina B Marvasti","doi":"10.25011/cim.v43i4.35003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Canadian clinician-scientist trainees enrolled in dual degree programs often pursue an extended training route following completion of MD and MSc or PhD degrees. However, the proportion, plans and reasoning of trainees who intend to pursue training internationally following dual degree completion has not been investigated. In this study, we assessed the international training considerations of current clinician-scientist trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed an 11-question survey, which was sent out by program directors to all current MDPhD program and Clinician Investigator Program (CIP) trainees. Responses were collected from July 8, 2019 to August 8, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received a total of 191 responses, with representation from every Canadian medical school and both MD-PhD program and CIP trainees. The majority of trainees are considering completing additional training outside Canada, most commonly post-doctoral and/or clinical fellowships. The most common reasons for considering international training include those related to quality and prestige of training programs. In contrast, the most common reasons for considering staying in Canada for additional training are related to personal and ethical reasons. Irrespective of intentions to pursue international training, the majority of trainees ultimately intend to establish a career in Canada.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While most trainees are considering additional training outside of Canada due to prestige and quality of training, the majority of trainees intend to pursue a career as a clinician-scientist back in Canada. Trainees would likely benefit from improved guidance and mentorship on the value of international training, as well as enhanced support in facilitating cross-border mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":50683,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International training considerations of Canadian Clinician-Scientist Trainees - A national survey.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Pietrobon,&nbsp;Elina K Cook,&nbsp;Charles Yin,&nbsp;Derek C H Chan,&nbsp;Tina B Marvasti\",\"doi\":\"10.25011/cim.v43i4.35003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Canadian clinician-scientist trainees enrolled in dual degree programs often pursue an extended training route following completion of MD and MSc or PhD degrees. However, the proportion, plans and reasoning of trainees who intend to pursue training internationally following dual degree completion has not been investigated. In this study, we assessed the international training considerations of current clinician-scientist trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed an 11-question survey, which was sent out by program directors to all current MDPhD program and Clinician Investigator Program (CIP) trainees. Responses were collected from July 8, 2019 to August 8, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received a total of 191 responses, with representation from every Canadian medical school and both MD-PhD program and CIP trainees. The majority of trainees are considering completing additional training outside Canada, most commonly post-doctoral and/or clinical fellowships. The most common reasons for considering international training include those related to quality and prestige of training programs. In contrast, the most common reasons for considering staying in Canada for additional training are related to personal and ethical reasons. Irrespective of intentions to pursue international training, the majority of trainees ultimately intend to establish a career in Canada.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While most trainees are considering additional training outside of Canada due to prestige and quality of training, the majority of trainees intend to pursue a career as a clinician-scientist back in Canada. Trainees would likely benefit from improved guidance and mentorship on the value of international training, as well as enhanced support in facilitating cross-border mobility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Investigative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Investigative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v43i4.35003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v43i4.35003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:参加双学位课程的加拿大临床科学家学员通常在完成医学博士和理学硕士或博士学位后继续扩展培训路线。然而,在完成双学位后打算继续接受国际培训的受训者的比例、计划和理由尚未得到调查。在本研究中,我们评估了当前临床科学家实习生的国际培训考虑因素。方法:我们设计了一份包含11个问题的调查问卷,由项目主任发给所有在职MDPhD项目和临床医师调查员项目(CIP)学员。回复收集于2019年7月8日至2019年8月8日。结果:我们总共收到了191份回复,来自加拿大所有医学院、医学博士项目和CIP学员。大多数受训者正在考虑在加拿大以外完成额外的培训,最常见的是博士后和/或临床研究金。考虑国际培训最常见的原因包括与培训项目的质量和声誉有关的原因。相比之下,考虑留在加拿大接受额外培训的最常见原因与个人和道德原因有关。无论是否有意接受国际培训,大多数学员最终都打算在加拿大建立职业生涯。结论:由于声誉和培训质量的原因,大多数受训者考虑在加拿大以外的地方进行额外的培训,但大多数受训者打算在加拿大从事临床科学家的职业。受训人员可能会受益于关于国际培训价值的更好的指导和指导,以及在促进跨界流动方面得到更多的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International training considerations of Canadian Clinician-Scientist Trainees - A national survey.

Purpose: Canadian clinician-scientist trainees enrolled in dual degree programs often pursue an extended training route following completion of MD and MSc or PhD degrees. However, the proportion, plans and reasoning of trainees who intend to pursue training internationally following dual degree completion has not been investigated. In this study, we assessed the international training considerations of current clinician-scientist trainees.

Methods: We designed an 11-question survey, which was sent out by program directors to all current MDPhD program and Clinician Investigator Program (CIP) trainees. Responses were collected from July 8, 2019 to August 8, 2019.

Results: We received a total of 191 responses, with representation from every Canadian medical school and both MD-PhD program and CIP trainees. The majority of trainees are considering completing additional training outside Canada, most commonly post-doctoral and/or clinical fellowships. The most common reasons for considering international training include those related to quality and prestige of training programs. In contrast, the most common reasons for considering staying in Canada for additional training are related to personal and ethical reasons. Irrespective of intentions to pursue international training, the majority of trainees ultimately intend to establish a career in Canada.

Conclusion: While most trainees are considering additional training outside of Canada due to prestige and quality of training, the majority of trainees intend to pursue a career as a clinician-scientist back in Canada. Trainees would likely benefit from improved guidance and mentorship on the value of international training, as well as enhanced support in facilitating cross-border mobility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Investigative Medicine
Clinical and Investigative Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Investigative Medicine (CIM), publishes original work in the field of Clinical Investigation. Original work includes clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical reports. Reviews include information for Continuing Medical Education (CME), narrative review articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信