2017-2018年泰国蜜蜂曲曲霉病和tropilael侵染情况分析

IF 1.7 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2021-06-14 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/VMRR.S306658
Tawan Thongsawang, Putthipanya Rueangsom, Khemmapat Boonyo, Vilaiporn Wongphruksasoong, Rapeepong Suphanchaimat
{"title":"2017-2018年泰国蜜蜂曲曲霉病和tropilael侵染情况分析","authors":"Tawan Thongsawang,&nbsp;Putthipanya Rueangsom,&nbsp;Khemmapat Boonyo,&nbsp;Vilaiporn Wongphruksasoong,&nbsp;Rapeepong Suphanchaimat","doi":"10.2147/VMRR.S306658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>To explore the prevalence of <i>Varroa destructor</i> and Tropilaelaps infestation in honeybees in Thailand and investigate factors associated with those diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative cross-sectional design was employed during 2017-2018. We sampled 144 apiaries in 13 provinces from the surveillance database of the Department of Livestock Development. In total, 1,152 bee samples were collected. A microscopic exam was performed to assess if each sample was infested with <i>Varroa destructor</i> mites and tropilaelaps mites. A chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of <i>Varroa destructor</i> and Tropilaelaps infestation at the apiary level was 50.69% and 32.64%, respectively. At the beehive level, we found that the prevalence of <i>Varroa destructor</i> infestation was 22.74% while that of Tropilaelaps infestation was 6.94%. The northern region saw the highest prevalence of <i>Varroa destructor</i> and Tropilaelaps infestation. Apiaries that received a \"Good Agricultural Practice\" (GAP) certificate from the Bureau of Livestock Standards and Certification, demonstrated a 42% lower chance of contracting both parasitic infestations; however, no statistically significant difference was reported. Apiaries that had a history of chemical use showed approximately 2.7 times greater odds of Tropilaelaps infestation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-6.21) with statistical significance (p = 0.02). The probability of <i>Varroa destructor</i> infestation amongst apiaries with apiary movement was approximately 60% lower than amongst those without apiary movement (AOR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.20-0.80, p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>Varroa destructor</i> and Tropilaelaps infestations are a critical concern for beekeeping in Thailand. Apiary movement tended to lower the risk of <i>Varroa destructor</i> infestation while chemical use tended to enhance the risk of Tropilaelaps infestation. Further studies that allow a more comprehensive collection of determinants of parasitic infestation in honeybees, for instance, apiary cleaning frequency and farm environments (such as temperature and rainfall), are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":75300,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"12 ","pages":"169-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/84/2d/vmrr-12-169.PMC8214108.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Situation Analysis of Varroosis and Tropilaelaps Infestation of Honeybees in Thailand, 2017-2018.\",\"authors\":\"Tawan Thongsawang,&nbsp;Putthipanya Rueangsom,&nbsp;Khemmapat Boonyo,&nbsp;Vilaiporn Wongphruksasoong,&nbsp;Rapeepong Suphanchaimat\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/VMRR.S306658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>To explore the prevalence of <i>Varroa destructor</i> and Tropilaelaps infestation in honeybees in Thailand and investigate factors associated with those diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative cross-sectional design was employed during 2017-2018. We sampled 144 apiaries in 13 provinces from the surveillance database of the Department of Livestock Development. In total, 1,152 bee samples were collected. A microscopic exam was performed to assess if each sample was infested with <i>Varroa destructor</i> mites and tropilaelaps mites. A chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of <i>Varroa destructor</i> and Tropilaelaps infestation at the apiary level was 50.69% and 32.64%, respectively. At the beehive level, we found that the prevalence of <i>Varroa destructor</i> infestation was 22.74% while that of Tropilaelaps infestation was 6.94%. The northern region saw the highest prevalence of <i>Varroa destructor</i> and Tropilaelaps infestation. Apiaries that received a \\\"Good Agricultural Practice\\\" (GAP) certificate from the Bureau of Livestock Standards and Certification, demonstrated a 42% lower chance of contracting both parasitic infestations; however, no statistically significant difference was reported. Apiaries that had a history of chemical use showed approximately 2.7 times greater odds of Tropilaelaps infestation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-6.21) with statistical significance (p = 0.02). The probability of <i>Varroa destructor</i> infestation amongst apiaries with apiary movement was approximately 60% lower than amongst those without apiary movement (AOR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.20-0.80, p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>Varroa destructor</i> and Tropilaelaps infestations are a critical concern for beekeeping in Thailand. Apiary movement tended to lower the risk of <i>Varroa destructor</i> infestation while chemical use tended to enhance the risk of Tropilaelaps infestation. Further studies that allow a more comprehensive collection of determinants of parasitic infestation in honeybees, for instance, apiary cleaning frequency and farm environments (such as temperature and rainfall), are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"169-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/84/2d/vmrr-12-169.PMC8214108.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S306658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S306658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:了解泰国蜜蜂中破坏瓦螨和Tropilaelaps的流行情况,并探讨与这些疾病相关的因素。方法:2017-2018年采用定量横断面设计。我们从畜牧发展部的监测数据库中抽样了13个省的144个养蜂场。总共收集了1152个蜜蜂样本。进行显微镜检查以评估每个样本是否有破坏瓦螨和恙螨。进行卡方检验和多变量logistic回归。结果:蜂房水平灭蟑率为50.69%,恙螨率为32.64%。在蜂群水平上,害瓦螨侵染率为22.74%,恙螨侵染率为6.94%。北部地区以破坏瓦螨和Tropilaelaps为主。获得家畜标准和认证局颁发的“良好农业规范”(GAP)证书的养蜂场,感染这两种寄生虫的几率降低了42%;然而,没有统计学上的显著差异。有化学药剂使用史的养蜂场,虫蚤侵染的几率约为其2.7倍(校正优势比[AOR] = 2.69;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.16-6.21),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.02)。有蜂房移动的蜂房发生灭蟑的概率比没有蜂房移动的蜂房低约60% (AOR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.20 ~ 0.80, p = 0.01)。结论:在泰国养蜂业中,破坏瓦螨和Tropilaelaps的侵害是一个重要的问题。蜂房移动有降低灭蟑危害风险的趋势,而化学药剂使用有增加troipaelaps危害风险的趋势。建议进行进一步的研究,以便更全面地收集蜜蜂寄生虫感染的决定因素,例如,蜂房清洁频率和农场环境(如温度和降雨)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Situation Analysis of Varroosis and Tropilaelaps Infestation of Honeybees in Thailand, 2017-2018.

Situation Analysis of Varroosis and Tropilaelaps Infestation of Honeybees in Thailand, 2017-2018.

Background/aim: To explore the prevalence of Varroa destructor and Tropilaelaps infestation in honeybees in Thailand and investigate factors associated with those diseases.

Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional design was employed during 2017-2018. We sampled 144 apiaries in 13 provinces from the surveillance database of the Department of Livestock Development. In total, 1,152 bee samples were collected. A microscopic exam was performed to assess if each sample was infested with Varroa destructor mites and tropilaelaps mites. A chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression were conducted.

Results: The prevalence of Varroa destructor and Tropilaelaps infestation at the apiary level was 50.69% and 32.64%, respectively. At the beehive level, we found that the prevalence of Varroa destructor infestation was 22.74% while that of Tropilaelaps infestation was 6.94%. The northern region saw the highest prevalence of Varroa destructor and Tropilaelaps infestation. Apiaries that received a "Good Agricultural Practice" (GAP) certificate from the Bureau of Livestock Standards and Certification, demonstrated a 42% lower chance of contracting both parasitic infestations; however, no statistically significant difference was reported. Apiaries that had a history of chemical use showed approximately 2.7 times greater odds of Tropilaelaps infestation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-6.21) with statistical significance (p = 0.02). The probability of Varroa destructor infestation amongst apiaries with apiary movement was approximately 60% lower than amongst those without apiary movement (AOR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.20-0.80, p = 0.01).

Conclusion: Varroa destructor and Tropilaelaps infestations are a critical concern for beekeeping in Thailand. Apiary movement tended to lower the risk of Varroa destructor infestation while chemical use tended to enhance the risk of Tropilaelaps infestation. Further studies that allow a more comprehensive collection of determinants of parasitic infestation in honeybees, for instance, apiary cleaning frequency and farm environments (such as temperature and rainfall), are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信