基于电脑游戏的上肢评估工具对脑瘫儿童物体操作任务的信度和效度。

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Anuprita Kanitkar, Sanjay T Parmar, Tony J Szturm, Gayle Restall, Gina Rempel, Nilashri Naik, Neha Gaonkar, Nariman Sepehri, Bhavana Ankolekar
{"title":"基于电脑游戏的上肢评估工具对脑瘫儿童物体操作任务的信度和效度。","authors":"Anuprita Kanitkar,&nbsp;Sanjay T Parmar,&nbsp;Tony J Szturm,&nbsp;Gayle Restall,&nbsp;Gina Rempel,&nbsp;Nilashri Naik,&nbsp;Neha Gaonkar,&nbsp;Nariman Sepehri,&nbsp;Bhavana Ankolekar","doi":"10.1177/20556683211014023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A computer game-based upper extremity (CUE) assessment tool is developed to quantify manual dexterity of children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). The purpose of this study was to determine test-retest reliability of the CUE performance measures (success rate, movement onset time, movement error, and movement variation) and convergent validity with the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale version 2 (PDMS-2) and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five children with CP aged four to ten years were tested on two occasions two weeks apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CUE performance measures of five chosen object manipulation tasks exhibited high to moderate intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values. There was no significant difference in the CUE performance measures between test periods. With few exceptions, there was no significant correlation between the CUE performance measures and the PDMS-2 or the QUEST test scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high to moderate ICC values and lack of systematic errors indicate that the CUE assessment tool has the ability to repeatedly record reliable performance measures of different object manipulation tasks. The lack of a correlation between the CUE and the PDMS-2 or QUEST scores indicates that performance measures of these assessment tools represent distinct attributes of manual dexterity.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"8 ","pages":"20556683211014023"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20556683211014023","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of a computer game-based tool of upper extremity assessment for object manipulation tasks in children with cerebral palsy.\",\"authors\":\"Anuprita Kanitkar,&nbsp;Sanjay T Parmar,&nbsp;Tony J Szturm,&nbsp;Gayle Restall,&nbsp;Gina Rempel,&nbsp;Nilashri Naik,&nbsp;Neha Gaonkar,&nbsp;Nariman Sepehri,&nbsp;Bhavana Ankolekar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20556683211014023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A computer game-based upper extremity (CUE) assessment tool is developed to quantify manual dexterity of children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). The purpose of this study was to determine test-retest reliability of the CUE performance measures (success rate, movement onset time, movement error, and movement variation) and convergent validity with the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale version 2 (PDMS-2) and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five children with CP aged four to ten years were tested on two occasions two weeks apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CUE performance measures of five chosen object manipulation tasks exhibited high to moderate intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values. There was no significant difference in the CUE performance measures between test periods. With few exceptions, there was no significant correlation between the CUE performance measures and the PDMS-2 or the QUEST test scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high to moderate ICC values and lack of systematic errors indicate that the CUE assessment tool has the ability to repeatedly record reliable performance measures of different object manipulation tasks. The lack of a correlation between the CUE and the PDMS-2 or QUEST scores indicates that performance measures of these assessment tools represent distinct attributes of manual dexterity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"20556683211014023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20556683211014023\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211014023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211014023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

介绍:开发了一种基于计算机游戏的上肢(CUE)评估工具,用于量化脑瘫(CP)儿童的手灵巧性。本研究的目的是确定CUE表现测量(成功率、运动开始时间、运动误差和运动变化)的重测信度,以及与Peabody发展运动量表第2版(PDMS-2)和上肢技能质量测试(QUEST)的趋同效度。方法:对35例4 ~ 10岁的CP患儿进行两次测试,每次间隔两周。结果:五种选择的对象操作任务的CUE绩效测量显示出高到中等的类内相关系数(ICC)值。在测试期间,CUE性能测量没有显著差异。除了少数例外,在CUE性能测量和PDMS-2或QUEST测试分数之间没有显著的相关性。结论:高至中等ICC值和缺乏系统误差表明CUE评估工具有能力重复记录不同物体操作任务的可靠性能指标。CUE和PDMS-2或QUEST分数之间缺乏相关性表明,这些评估工具的性能度量代表了手工灵巧性的不同属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reliability and validity of a computer game-based tool of upper extremity assessment for object manipulation tasks in children with cerebral palsy.

Reliability and validity of a computer game-based tool of upper extremity assessment for object manipulation tasks in children with cerebral palsy.

Reliability and validity of a computer game-based tool of upper extremity assessment for object manipulation tasks in children with cerebral palsy.

Reliability and validity of a computer game-based tool of upper extremity assessment for object manipulation tasks in children with cerebral palsy.

Introduction: A computer game-based upper extremity (CUE) assessment tool is developed to quantify manual dexterity of children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). The purpose of this study was to determine test-retest reliability of the CUE performance measures (success rate, movement onset time, movement error, and movement variation) and convergent validity with the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale version 2 (PDMS-2) and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST).

Methods: Thirty-five children with CP aged four to ten years were tested on two occasions two weeks apart.

Results: CUE performance measures of five chosen object manipulation tasks exhibited high to moderate intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values. There was no significant difference in the CUE performance measures between test periods. With few exceptions, there was no significant correlation between the CUE performance measures and the PDMS-2 or the QUEST test scores.

Conclusions: The high to moderate ICC values and lack of systematic errors indicate that the CUE assessment tool has the ability to repeatedly record reliable performance measures of different object manipulation tasks. The lack of a correlation between the CUE and the PDMS-2 or QUEST scores indicates that performance measures of these assessment tools represent distinct attributes of manual dexterity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信