成人发展性语言障碍的词汇学习概况。

IF 3.4 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Karla K McGregor, Timothy Arbisi-Kelm, Nichole Eden, Jacob Oleson
{"title":"成人发展性语言障碍的词汇学习概况。","authors":"Karla K McGregor,&nbsp;Timothy Arbisi-Kelm,&nbsp;Nichole Eden,&nbsp;Jacob Oleson","doi":"10.1177/2396941519899311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Previous investigations of word learning problems among people with developmental language disorder suggest that encoding, not retention, is the primary deficit. We aimed to replicate this finding; test the prediction that word form, not the linking of form to referent, is particularly problematic; and determine whether women with developmental language disorder are better word learners than men with developmental language disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty adults with developmental language disorder and 19 age-, sex-, and education-matched peers with typical language development attempted to learn 15 words by retrieval practice. Their retention was measured one day-, one week-, and one month after training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants with developmental language disorder required more exposures to the word-referent pairs than the participants with typical language development to reach mastery. While training to mastery, they made more errors in word form production, alone or in combination with errors in linking forms to the correct referents, but the number of no attempts and pure link errors did not differ by group. Women demonstrated stronger retention of the words than men at all intervals. The developmental language disorder and typical language development groups did not differ at the one-day- and one-month retention intervals but the developmental language disorder group was weaker at the one-week interval. Review via retrieval practice at the one-day and one-week interval enhanced retention at the one-month interval; the review at one week was more beneficial than the review at one day. Women benefitted more from the review opportunities than men but the developmental language disorder and typical language development groups did not differ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults with developmental language disorder present with weaknesses in the encoding of new words but retention is a relative strength. Encoding word forms is especially challenging but encoding word-to-referent links is not. We interpret this profile, and the evidence of a female advantage, as consistent with the Procedural Circuit Deficit Hypothesis.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>When treating a client with developmental language disorder whose goal is to increase vocabulary knowledge, the interventionist should anticipate the need for multiple exposures to new words within activities that highlight the forms of the words and support their memory and production. Periodic review should serve to support long-term retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":36716,"journal":{"name":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","volume":"5 ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2396941519899311","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The word learning profile of adults with developmental language disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Karla K McGregor,&nbsp;Timothy Arbisi-Kelm,&nbsp;Nichole Eden,&nbsp;Jacob Oleson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2396941519899311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Previous investigations of word learning problems among people with developmental language disorder suggest that encoding, not retention, is the primary deficit. We aimed to replicate this finding; test the prediction that word form, not the linking of form to referent, is particularly problematic; and determine whether women with developmental language disorder are better word learners than men with developmental language disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty adults with developmental language disorder and 19 age-, sex-, and education-matched peers with typical language development attempted to learn 15 words by retrieval practice. Their retention was measured one day-, one week-, and one month after training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants with developmental language disorder required more exposures to the word-referent pairs than the participants with typical language development to reach mastery. While training to mastery, they made more errors in word form production, alone or in combination with errors in linking forms to the correct referents, but the number of no attempts and pure link errors did not differ by group. Women demonstrated stronger retention of the words than men at all intervals. The developmental language disorder and typical language development groups did not differ at the one-day- and one-month retention intervals but the developmental language disorder group was weaker at the one-week interval. Review via retrieval practice at the one-day and one-week interval enhanced retention at the one-month interval; the review at one week was more beneficial than the review at one day. Women benefitted more from the review opportunities than men but the developmental language disorder and typical language development groups did not differ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults with developmental language disorder present with weaknesses in the encoding of new words but retention is a relative strength. Encoding word forms is especially challenging but encoding word-to-referent links is not. We interpret this profile, and the evidence of a female advantage, as consistent with the Procedural Circuit Deficit Hypothesis.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>When treating a client with developmental language disorder whose goal is to increase vocabulary knowledge, the interventionist should anticipate the need for multiple exposures to new words within activities that highlight the forms of the words and support their memory and production. Periodic review should serve to support long-term retention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2396941519899311\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941519899311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941519899311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

背景和目的:先前对发展性语言障碍患者的单词学习问题的调查表明,编码而不是记忆是主要的缺陷。我们的目标是重复这一发现;测试预测词的形式,而不是形式与指称物的连接,是特别有问题的;并确定患有发展性语言障碍的女性是否比患有发展性语言障碍的男性更好地学习单词。方法:20名发育性语言障碍成人和19名年龄、性别、教育程度相匹配的语言发育典型同伴,尝试通过检索练习学习15个单词。他们的记忆力在训练后的一天、一周和一个月被测量。结果:发展性语言障碍的被试比典型语言发展的被试需要更多的词语指称对的接触来达到掌握。在训练到掌握的过程中,他们在词形生成上犯了更多的错误,无论是单独的还是与正确指代物连接形式的错误结合在一起,但没有尝试和纯粹连接错误的数量在各组之间没有差异。在所有时间间隔中,女性对单词的记忆都比男性强。发展性语言障碍组和典型语言发展组在1个月和1个月的保留期没有差异,但发展性语言障碍组在1周的保留期较弱。每隔1天和1周进行检索练习,可提高每隔1个月的记忆力;一周的复习比一天的复习更有益。女性比男性从复习机会中获益更多,但发展性语言障碍和典型语言发展组没有差异。结论:成人发展性语言障碍在新单词编码方面存在缺陷,但在词汇保留方面具有优势。对单词形式进行编码尤其具有挑战性,但对单词到引用的链接进行编码则不然。我们解释这一特征,以及女性优势的证据,与程序回路缺陷假说一致。启示:当治疗以增加词汇知识为目标的发展性语言障碍患者时,干预者应该预见到在强调单词形式并支持其记忆和生成的活动中需要多次接触新单词。定期审查应有助于长期保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The word learning profile of adults with developmental language disorder.

The word learning profile of adults with developmental language disorder.

The word learning profile of adults with developmental language disorder.

The word learning profile of adults with developmental language disorder.

Background and aims: Previous investigations of word learning problems among people with developmental language disorder suggest that encoding, not retention, is the primary deficit. We aimed to replicate this finding; test the prediction that word form, not the linking of form to referent, is particularly problematic; and determine whether women with developmental language disorder are better word learners than men with developmental language disorder.

Methods: Twenty adults with developmental language disorder and 19 age-, sex-, and education-matched peers with typical language development attempted to learn 15 words by retrieval practice. Their retention was measured one day-, one week-, and one month after training.

Results: The participants with developmental language disorder required more exposures to the word-referent pairs than the participants with typical language development to reach mastery. While training to mastery, they made more errors in word form production, alone or in combination with errors in linking forms to the correct referents, but the number of no attempts and pure link errors did not differ by group. Women demonstrated stronger retention of the words than men at all intervals. The developmental language disorder and typical language development groups did not differ at the one-day- and one-month retention intervals but the developmental language disorder group was weaker at the one-week interval. Review via retrieval practice at the one-day and one-week interval enhanced retention at the one-month interval; the review at one week was more beneficial than the review at one day. Women benefitted more from the review opportunities than men but the developmental language disorder and typical language development groups did not differ.

Conclusions: Adults with developmental language disorder present with weaknesses in the encoding of new words but retention is a relative strength. Encoding word forms is especially challenging but encoding word-to-referent links is not. We interpret this profile, and the evidence of a female advantage, as consistent with the Procedural Circuit Deficit Hypothesis.

Implications: When treating a client with developmental language disorder whose goal is to increase vocabulary knowledge, the interventionist should anticipate the need for multiple exposures to new words within activities that highlight the forms of the words and support their memory and production. Periodic review should serve to support long-term retention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Autism and Developmental Language Impairments
Autism and Developmental Language Impairments Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信