多囊卵巢综合征的护理模式:指南推荐综合护理的回顾和定性评价。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Seminars in reproductive medicine Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-29 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1727191
Chau Thien Tay, Stephanie Pirotta, Helena J Teede, Lisa J Moran, Tracy Robinson, Helen Skouteris, Anju E Joham, Siew S Lim
{"title":"多囊卵巢综合征的护理模式:指南推荐综合护理的回顾和定性评价。","authors":"Chau Thien Tay,&nbsp;Stephanie Pirotta,&nbsp;Helena J Teede,&nbsp;Lisa J Moran,&nbsp;Tracy Robinson,&nbsp;Helen Skouteris,&nbsp;Anju E Joham,&nbsp;Siew S Lim","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1727191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous disorder and many women are dissatisfied with their healthcare under the current fragmented health services. Here, we review existing literature on PCOS healthcare services and qualitatively evaluate an integrated PCOS service based on experiences of women with PCOS. Limited prior PCOS-dedicated services have been studied and their quantitative and efficacy-focused evaluations are summarized. Here, we also provide a broader PCOS service evaluation via semistructured interviews and surveys, with thematic analysis based on a predetermined evaluation framework. Fifteen women completed interviews and surveys. Overall the integrated, evidence-based PCOS service was well-received and women were generally satisfied with appropriateness, effectiveness, and reported positive health impact resulting from the service. Integrated care, tailored treatments, education, lifestyle support, and laser therapy were highly valued. Patients reported improvements on symptoms, understanding and confidence in managing PCOS, and emotional well-being. Elements of efficiency in the initial stages, awareness and communication, and the need for service expansion and tensions between evidence-based treatments and patient preferences were also captured to guide improvement. Further research into models of care is recommended to meet the needs of women with PCOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":21661,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in reproductive medicine","volume":"39 3-04","pages":"133-142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Models of Care: A Review and Qualitative Evaluation of a Guideline-Recommended Integrated Care.\",\"authors\":\"Chau Thien Tay,&nbsp;Stephanie Pirotta,&nbsp;Helena J Teede,&nbsp;Lisa J Moran,&nbsp;Tracy Robinson,&nbsp;Helen Skouteris,&nbsp;Anju E Joham,&nbsp;Siew S Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1727191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous disorder and many women are dissatisfied with their healthcare under the current fragmented health services. Here, we review existing literature on PCOS healthcare services and qualitatively evaluate an integrated PCOS service based on experiences of women with PCOS. Limited prior PCOS-dedicated services have been studied and their quantitative and efficacy-focused evaluations are summarized. Here, we also provide a broader PCOS service evaluation via semistructured interviews and surveys, with thematic analysis based on a predetermined evaluation framework. Fifteen women completed interviews and surveys. Overall the integrated, evidence-based PCOS service was well-received and women were generally satisfied with appropriateness, effectiveness, and reported positive health impact resulting from the service. Integrated care, tailored treatments, education, lifestyle support, and laser therapy were highly valued. Patients reported improvements on symptoms, understanding and confidence in managing PCOS, and emotional well-being. Elements of efficiency in the initial stages, awareness and communication, and the need for service expansion and tensions between evidence-based treatments and patient preferences were also captured to guide improvement. Further research into models of care is recommended to meet the needs of women with PCOS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 3-04\",\"pages\":\"133-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1727191\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1727191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是一种异质性疾病,在目前分散的医疗服务下,许多妇女对自己的医疗保健不满意。在此,我们回顾了关于PCOS医疗服务的现有文献,并根据PCOS女性的经验对PCOS综合服务进行了定性评价。对以往有限的pcos专用服务进行了研究,并对其定量和以疗效为重点的评价进行了总结。在这里,我们还通过半结构化访谈和调查提供更广泛的PCOS服务评估,并基于预先确定的评估框架进行专题分析。15名女性完成了访谈和调查。总体而言,以证据为基础的综合多囊卵巢综合征服务受到好评,妇女普遍对该服务的适当性、有效性和报告的积极健康影响感到满意。综合护理、量身定制的治疗、教育、生活方式支持和激光治疗是非常重要的。患者报告症状改善,对多囊卵巢综合征管理的理解和信心改善,情绪健康改善。还捕获了初始阶段的效率、意识和沟通、扩大服务的需要以及循证治疗与患者偏好之间的紧张关系等因素,以指导改进。建议进一步研究护理模式,以满足多囊卵巢综合征妇女的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Models of Care: A Review and Qualitative Evaluation of a Guideline-Recommended Integrated Care.

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous disorder and many women are dissatisfied with their healthcare under the current fragmented health services. Here, we review existing literature on PCOS healthcare services and qualitatively evaluate an integrated PCOS service based on experiences of women with PCOS. Limited prior PCOS-dedicated services have been studied and their quantitative and efficacy-focused evaluations are summarized. Here, we also provide a broader PCOS service evaluation via semistructured interviews and surveys, with thematic analysis based on a predetermined evaluation framework. Fifteen women completed interviews and surveys. Overall the integrated, evidence-based PCOS service was well-received and women were generally satisfied with appropriateness, effectiveness, and reported positive health impact resulting from the service. Integrated care, tailored treatments, education, lifestyle support, and laser therapy were highly valued. Patients reported improvements on symptoms, understanding and confidence in managing PCOS, and emotional well-being. Elements of efficiency in the initial stages, awareness and communication, and the need for service expansion and tensions between evidence-based treatments and patient preferences were also captured to guide improvement. Further research into models of care is recommended to meet the needs of women with PCOS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in reproductive medicine
Seminars in reproductive medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Reproductive Medicine is a bi-monthly topic driven review journal that provides in-depth coverage of important advances in the understanding of normal and disordered human reproductive function, as well as new diagnostic and interventional techniques. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine offers an informed perspective on issues like male and female infertility, reproductive physiology, pharmacological hormonal manipulation, and state-of-the-art assisted reproductive technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信