“优生学”可以辩护吗?

IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS

Monash Bioethics Review Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s40592-021-00129-1

Walter Veit, Jonathan Anomaly, Nicholas Agar, Peter Singer, Diana S Fleischman, Francesca Minerva

{"title":"“优生学”可以辩护吗?","authors":"Walter Veit, Jonathan Anomaly, Nicholas Agar, Peter Singer, Diana S Fleischman, Francesca Minerva","doi":"10.1007/s40592-021-00129-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, bioethical discourse around the topic of 'genetic enhancement' has become increasingly politicized. We fear there is too much focus on the semantic question of whether we should call particular practices and emerging bio-technologies such as CRISPR 'eugenics', rather than the more important question of how we should view them from the perspective of ethics and policy. Here, we address the question of whether 'eugenics' can be defended and how proponents and critics of enhancement should engage with each other.","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"60-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40592-021-00129-1","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can 'eugenics' be defended?\",\"authors\":\"Walter Veit, Jonathan Anomaly, Nicholas Agar, Peter Singer, Diana S Fleischman, Francesca Minerva\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40592-021-00129-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, bioethical discourse around the topic of 'genetic enhancement' has become increasingly politicized. We fear there is too much focus on the semantic question of whether we should call particular practices and emerging bio-technologies such as CRISPR 'eugenics', rather than the more important question of how we should view them from the perspective of ethics and policy. Here, we address the question of whether 'eugenics' can be defended and how proponents and critics of enhancement should engage with each other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monash Bioethics Review\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"60-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40592-021-00129-1\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monash Bioethics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00129-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash Bioethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00129-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

摘要

近年来，围绕“基因增强”话题的生物伦理讨论越来越政治化。我们担心人们过于关注语义问题，即我们是否应该将特定的实践和新兴的生物技术(如CRISPR)称为“优生学”，而不是更重要的问题，即我们应该如何从伦理和政策的角度看待它们。在这里，我们讨论的问题是“优生学”是否可以辩护，以及强化的支持者和批评者应该如何相互接触。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Can 'eugenics' be defended?

In recent years, bioethical discourse around the topic of 'genetic enhancement' has become increasingly politicized. We fear there is too much focus on the semantic question of whether we should call particular practices and emerging bio-technologies such as CRISPR 'eugenics', rather than the more important question of how we should view them from the perspective of ethics and policy. Here, we address the question of whether 'eugenics' can be defended and how proponents and critics of enhancement should engage with each other.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Monash Bioethics Review ETHICS-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

6.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Monash Bioethics Review provides comprehensive coverage of traditional topics and emerging issues in bioethics. The Journal is especially concerned with empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance. Monash Bioethics Review also regularly publishes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications. Produced by the Monash University Centre for Human Bioethics since 1981 (originally as Bioethics News), Monash Bioethics Review is the oldest peer reviewed bioethics journal based in Australia–and one of the oldest bioethics journals in the world. An international forum for empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance. Includes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications. One of the oldest bioethics journals, produced by a world-leading bioethics centre. Publishes papers up to 13,000 words in length. Unique New Feature: All Articles Open for Commentary