按医疗机构类型分列的宫颈癌结果:2004-2015年国家癌症数据库。

Cancer health disparities Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-04-23
HyounKyoung G Park, Zhixin E Wang, Chenguang Wang, Warner K Huh, Sejong Bae
{"title":"按医疗机构类型分列的宫颈癌结果:2004-2015年国家癌症数据库。","authors":"HyounKyoung G Park,&nbsp;Zhixin E Wang,&nbsp;Chenguang Wang,&nbsp;Warner K Huh,&nbsp;Sejong Bae","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015 was analyzed to identify cervical cancer outcomes associated with demographic and clinical characteristics measured by types of facility. Chi-Square tests were used to compare proportions and logistic regression to determine factors associated with cervical cancer outcomes. Women treated at Academic/Research Programs (ARPs) were younger at diagnosis, more likely black, less educated and more in Stage 2, lived further away from treatment facilities, had less comorbidities and better 5-year survival, and were more likely to be alive at 30 and 90 days after surgery compared to other programs. Women treated at Community Cancer Programs were more likely 75 and older at diagnosis, more likely to receive radiation treatment and more in Stage 4, more living in rural areas and less than 10 miles from the facility, and had more comorbidities, and lower 5-year survival compared to other programs. Women treated at Comprehensive Community Cancer Programs were more likely white and educated, had more private insurance, and underwent surgery. Women treated at Integrated Network Cancer Programs were more likely to live in urban, south region, and in Stage 1B2, had more surgery and one comorbidity, and died fewer than 30 days after surgery. The type of facility and treatment had varied effects on mortality and 5-year survival. Considering the different cervical cancer outcomes from different health care facilities, further research is needed to identify what factors influence women to choose a health care facility for their treatment and how this choice can affect different health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72512,"journal":{"name":"Cancer health disparities","volume":"4 ","pages":"e1-e13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136613/pdf/nihms-1034624.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervical cancer outcome by type of health care facilities: National Cancer Database, 2004-2015.\",\"authors\":\"HyounKyoung G Park,&nbsp;Zhixin E Wang,&nbsp;Chenguang Wang,&nbsp;Warner K Huh,&nbsp;Sejong Bae\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015 was analyzed to identify cervical cancer outcomes associated with demographic and clinical characteristics measured by types of facility. Chi-Square tests were used to compare proportions and logistic regression to determine factors associated with cervical cancer outcomes. Women treated at Academic/Research Programs (ARPs) were younger at diagnosis, more likely black, less educated and more in Stage 2, lived further away from treatment facilities, had less comorbidities and better 5-year survival, and were more likely to be alive at 30 and 90 days after surgery compared to other programs. Women treated at Community Cancer Programs were more likely 75 and older at diagnosis, more likely to receive radiation treatment and more in Stage 4, more living in rural areas and less than 10 miles from the facility, and had more comorbidities, and lower 5-year survival compared to other programs. Women treated at Comprehensive Community Cancer Programs were more likely white and educated, had more private insurance, and underwent surgery. Women treated at Integrated Network Cancer Programs were more likely to live in urban, south region, and in Stage 1B2, had more surgery and one comorbidity, and died fewer than 30 days after surgery. The type of facility and treatment had varied effects on mortality and 5-year survival. Considering the different cervical cancer outcomes from different health care facilities, further research is needed to identify what factors influence women to choose a health care facility for their treatment and how this choice can affect different health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer health disparities\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"e1-e13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136613/pdf/nihms-1034624.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer health disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer health disparities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对2004年至2015年的国家癌症数据库进行分析,以确定宫颈癌结局与按设施类型测量的人口统计学和临床特征相关。卡方检验用于比较比例和逻辑回归,以确定与宫颈癌结局相关的因素。在学术/研究项目(ARPs)治疗的女性在诊断时更年轻,更可能是黑人,受教育程度较低,更多处于第二阶段,住得离治疗设施更远,合并症更少,5年生存率更高,与其他项目相比,更有可能在手术后30天和90天存活。在社区癌症项目中接受治疗的女性更有可能在诊断时达到75岁及以上,更有可能接受放射治疗,更有可能进入第四阶段,更多的人生活在农村地区,距离设施不到10英里,与其他项目相比,她们有更多的合并症,5年生存率更低。接受综合社区癌症项目治疗的女性更有可能是受过教育的白人,有更多的私人保险,接受过手术。接受综合网络癌症项目治疗的女性更有可能生活在城市、南部地区和1B2期,她们有更多的手术和一种合并症,并且在手术后不到30天死亡。设施和治疗类型对死亡率和5年生存率有不同的影响。考虑到来自不同医疗机构的宫颈癌结果不同,需要进一步研究确定哪些因素影响妇女选择医疗机构进行治疗,以及这种选择如何影响不同的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cervical cancer outcome by type of health care facilities: National Cancer Database, 2004-2015.

The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015 was analyzed to identify cervical cancer outcomes associated with demographic and clinical characteristics measured by types of facility. Chi-Square tests were used to compare proportions and logistic regression to determine factors associated with cervical cancer outcomes. Women treated at Academic/Research Programs (ARPs) were younger at diagnosis, more likely black, less educated and more in Stage 2, lived further away from treatment facilities, had less comorbidities and better 5-year survival, and were more likely to be alive at 30 and 90 days after surgery compared to other programs. Women treated at Community Cancer Programs were more likely 75 and older at diagnosis, more likely to receive radiation treatment and more in Stage 4, more living in rural areas and less than 10 miles from the facility, and had more comorbidities, and lower 5-year survival compared to other programs. Women treated at Comprehensive Community Cancer Programs were more likely white and educated, had more private insurance, and underwent surgery. Women treated at Integrated Network Cancer Programs were more likely to live in urban, south region, and in Stage 1B2, had more surgery and one comorbidity, and died fewer than 30 days after surgery. The type of facility and treatment had varied effects on mortality and 5-year survival. Considering the different cervical cancer outcomes from different health care facilities, further research is needed to identify what factors influence women to choose a health care facility for their treatment and how this choice can affect different health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信