多学科女性慢性骨盆疼痛项目的临床结果。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lauren C Westbay, William Adams, Margaret Kistner, Cynthia Brincat, Larissa Bresler, Linda C Yang, Colleen M Fitzgerald
{"title":"多学科女性慢性骨盆疼痛项目的临床结果。","authors":"Lauren C Westbay,&nbsp;William Adams,&nbsp;Margaret Kistner,&nbsp;Cynthia Brincat,&nbsp;Larissa Bresler,&nbsp;Linda C Yang,&nbsp;Colleen M Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe patient-reported longitudinal outcomes in a multidisciplinary female chronic pelvic pain (CPP) program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study for women cared for in a tertiary, multidisciplinary, female (CPP) program between 2012 and 2017. Patient demographics were collected from electronic medical records. Patients completed the numerical rating scale for pain, Pain Disability Index (PDI), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale at each visit. Mixed-effects models were used to assess change in patient responses over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (N = 317) with a mean age of 44.3 years (SD, 14.6) and median duration of symptoms of 3 years (interquartile range, 1.0-7.0) were assessed in this analysis. The primary diagnosis was pelvic floor myofascial pain (67%). On multivariable analysis, numerical rating scale scores decreased by -0.11 point [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.20 to -0.01] every 3 months (P = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, total PDI score decreased by -0.88 point (95% CI, -1.43 to -0.33) (P = 0.003), and PDI sexual subscores decreased by -0.29 point (95% CI, -0.44 to -0.14) (P < 0.001) every 3 months. A higher (worse) Patient Global Impression of Improvement score was associated with a higher (worse) PDI score at follow-up (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients in a multidisciplinary CPP program demonstrated improvement over time in pain disability that was associated with an overall global impression of improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"27 12","pages":"753-758"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes of a Multidisciplinary Female Chronic Pelvic Pain Program.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren C Westbay,&nbsp;William Adams,&nbsp;Margaret Kistner,&nbsp;Cynthia Brincat,&nbsp;Larissa Bresler,&nbsp;Linda C Yang,&nbsp;Colleen M Fitzgerald\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe patient-reported longitudinal outcomes in a multidisciplinary female chronic pelvic pain (CPP) program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study for women cared for in a tertiary, multidisciplinary, female (CPP) program between 2012 and 2017. Patient demographics were collected from electronic medical records. Patients completed the numerical rating scale for pain, Pain Disability Index (PDI), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale at each visit. Mixed-effects models were used to assess change in patient responses over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (N = 317) with a mean age of 44.3 years (SD, 14.6) and median duration of symptoms of 3 years (interquartile range, 1.0-7.0) were assessed in this analysis. The primary diagnosis was pelvic floor myofascial pain (67%). On multivariable analysis, numerical rating scale scores decreased by -0.11 point [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.20 to -0.01] every 3 months (P = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, total PDI score decreased by -0.88 point (95% CI, -1.43 to -0.33) (P = 0.003), and PDI sexual subscores decreased by -0.29 point (95% CI, -0.44 to -0.14) (P < 0.001) every 3 months. A higher (worse) Patient Global Impression of Improvement score was associated with a higher (worse) PDI score at follow-up (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients in a multidisciplinary CPP program demonstrated improvement over time in pain disability that was associated with an overall global impression of improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"27 12\",\"pages\":\"753-758\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是描述多学科女性慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)项目中患者报告的纵向结果。方法:我们对2012年至2017年在高等教育,多学科,女性(CPP)项目中护理的女性进行了回顾性队列研究。从电子病历中收集患者人口统计数据。患者在每次就诊时完成疼痛的数值评定量表、疼痛残疾指数(PDI)和患者整体改善印象量表。混合效应模型用于评估患者反应随时间的变化。结果:该分析评估了患者(N = 317),平均年龄为44.3岁(SD, 14.6),中位症状持续时间为3年(四分位数范围,1.0-7.0)。主要诊断为盆底肌筋膜疼痛(67%)。在多变量分析中,数值评定量表得分每3个月下降-0.11点[95%置信区间(CI), -0.20至-0.01](P = 0.03)。在多变量分析中,PDI总分每3个月下降-0.88分(95% CI, -1.43 ~ -0.33) (P = 0.003), PDI性评分每3个月下降-0.29分(95% CI, -0.44 ~ -0.14) (P < 0.001)。患者整体改善印象评分越高(越差),随访时PDI评分越高(越差)(优势比1.04;95% ci, 1.01-1.07;P = 0.01)。结论:在多学科CPP项目中,患者表现出疼痛残疾随着时间的推移而改善,这与整体改善的整体印象有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Outcomes of a Multidisciplinary Female Chronic Pelvic Pain Program.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe patient-reported longitudinal outcomes in a multidisciplinary female chronic pelvic pain (CPP) program.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study for women cared for in a tertiary, multidisciplinary, female (CPP) program between 2012 and 2017. Patient demographics were collected from electronic medical records. Patients completed the numerical rating scale for pain, Pain Disability Index (PDI), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale at each visit. Mixed-effects models were used to assess change in patient responses over time.

Results: Patients (N = 317) with a mean age of 44.3 years (SD, 14.6) and median duration of symptoms of 3 years (interquartile range, 1.0-7.0) were assessed in this analysis. The primary diagnosis was pelvic floor myofascial pain (67%). On multivariable analysis, numerical rating scale scores decreased by -0.11 point [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.20 to -0.01] every 3 months (P = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, total PDI score decreased by -0.88 point (95% CI, -1.43 to -0.33) (P = 0.003), and PDI sexual subscores decreased by -0.29 point (95% CI, -0.44 to -0.14) (P < 0.001) every 3 months. A higher (worse) Patient Global Impression of Improvement score was associated with a higher (worse) PDI score at follow-up (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; P = 0.01).

Conclusions: Patients in a multidisciplinary CPP program demonstrated improvement over time in pain disability that was associated with an overall global impression of improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信