使用BTA u评分指南对甲状腺结节进行超声分级-是否有证据表明观察者内部和观察者之间存在差异?

IF 0.8 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ultrasound Pub Date : 2021-05-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-16 DOI:10.1177/1742271X20971323
Michael Couzins, Stuart Forbes, Ganesh Vigneswaran, Indu Mitra, Elizabeth E Rutherford
{"title":"使用BTA u评分指南对甲状腺结节进行超声分级-是否有证据表明观察者内部和观察者之间存在差异?","authors":"Michael Couzins,&nbsp;Stuart Forbes,&nbsp;Ganesh Vigneswaran,&nbsp;Indu Mitra,&nbsp;Elizabeth E Rutherford","doi":"10.1177/1742271X20971323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>U-score ultrasound classification (graded U1-U5) is widely used to grade thyroid nodules based on benign and malignant sonographic features. It is well established that ultrasound is an operator-dependent imaging modality and thus more susceptible to subjective variances between operators when using imaging-based scoring systems. We aimed to assess whether there is any intra- or interobserver variability when U-scoring thyroid nodules and whether previous thyroid ultrasound experience has an effect on this variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 14 ultrasound operators were identified (five experienced thyroid operators, five with intermediate experience and four with no experience) and were asked to U-score images from 20 thyroid cases shown as a single projection, with and without Doppler flow. The cases were subsequently rescored by the 14 operators after six weeks. The first and second round U-scores for the three operator groups were then analysed using Fleiss' kappa to assess interobserver variability and Cochran's Q test to determine any intraobserver variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no significant interobserver variability on combined assessment of all operators with fair agreement in round 1 (Fleiss' kappa = 0.30, <i>p</i> <0.0001) and slight agreement in round 2 (Fleiss' kappa = 0.19, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Cochran's Q test revealed no significant intraobserver variability in all 14 operators between round 1 and round 2 (all <i>p</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no statistically significant inter- or intraobserver variability in the U-scoring of thyroid nodules between all participants reinforcing the validity of this scoring method in clinical practice, allaying concerns regarding potential subjective biases in reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":23440,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound","volume":"29 2","pages":"100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1742271X20971323","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound grading of thyroid nodules using the BTA U-scoring guidelines - Is there evidence of intra-and interobserver variability?\",\"authors\":\"Michael Couzins,&nbsp;Stuart Forbes,&nbsp;Ganesh Vigneswaran,&nbsp;Indu Mitra,&nbsp;Elizabeth E Rutherford\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1742271X20971323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>U-score ultrasound classification (graded U1-U5) is widely used to grade thyroid nodules based on benign and malignant sonographic features. It is well established that ultrasound is an operator-dependent imaging modality and thus more susceptible to subjective variances between operators when using imaging-based scoring systems. We aimed to assess whether there is any intra- or interobserver variability when U-scoring thyroid nodules and whether previous thyroid ultrasound experience has an effect on this variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 14 ultrasound operators were identified (five experienced thyroid operators, five with intermediate experience and four with no experience) and were asked to U-score images from 20 thyroid cases shown as a single projection, with and without Doppler flow. The cases were subsequently rescored by the 14 operators after six weeks. The first and second round U-scores for the three operator groups were then analysed using Fleiss' kappa to assess interobserver variability and Cochran's Q test to determine any intraobserver variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no significant interobserver variability on combined assessment of all operators with fair agreement in round 1 (Fleiss' kappa = 0.30, <i>p</i> <0.0001) and slight agreement in round 2 (Fleiss' kappa = 0.19, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Cochran's Q test revealed no significant intraobserver variability in all 14 operators between round 1 and round 2 (all <i>p</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no statistically significant inter- or intraobserver variability in the U-scoring of thyroid nodules between all participants reinforcing the validity of this scoring method in clinical practice, allaying concerns regarding potential subjective biases in reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"100-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1742271X20971323\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X20971323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/11/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X20971323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

U-score超声分级(分级为U1-U5)广泛应用于甲状腺结节的良恶性超声特征分级。众所周知,超声是一种依赖于操作人员的成像方式,因此在使用基于成像的评分系统时,操作员之间的主观差异更容易受到影响。我们的目的是评估在对甲状腺结节进行u评分时,是否存在任何观察者内部或观察者之间的可变性,以及以前的甲状腺超声经历是否对这种可变性有影响。方法:选取14名超声手术人员(5名有经验的甲状腺手术人员,5名有中级经验的手术人员,4名无经验的手术人员),对20例甲状腺患者的单投影图像进行u -评分,包括有无多普勒血流。6周后,14名手术人员将病例追回。然后使用Fleiss' kappa评估观察者之间的可变性和Cochran's Q测试来确定观察者内部的可变性,对三个操作员组的第一轮和第二轮u分数进行分析。结果:我们发现在第1轮对所有操作者的公平一致的综合评估中,观察者之间没有显著的差异(Fleiss’kappa = 0.30, pp p>0.05)。结论:我们发现,在所有参与者之间,甲状腺结节的u评分没有统计学意义上的差异,这加强了该评分方法在临床实践中的有效性,减轻了对报告中潜在主观偏差的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound grading of thyroid nodules using the BTA U-scoring guidelines - Is there evidence of intra-and interobserver variability?

Introduction: U-score ultrasound classification (graded U1-U5) is widely used to grade thyroid nodules based on benign and malignant sonographic features. It is well established that ultrasound is an operator-dependent imaging modality and thus more susceptible to subjective variances between operators when using imaging-based scoring systems. We aimed to assess whether there is any intra- or interobserver variability when U-scoring thyroid nodules and whether previous thyroid ultrasound experience has an effect on this variability.

Methods: A total of 14 ultrasound operators were identified (five experienced thyroid operators, five with intermediate experience and four with no experience) and were asked to U-score images from 20 thyroid cases shown as a single projection, with and without Doppler flow. The cases were subsequently rescored by the 14 operators after six weeks. The first and second round U-scores for the three operator groups were then analysed using Fleiss' kappa to assess interobserver variability and Cochran's Q test to determine any intraobserver variability.

Results: We found no significant interobserver variability on combined assessment of all operators with fair agreement in round 1 (Fleiss' kappa = 0.30, p <0.0001) and slight agreement in round 2 (Fleiss' kappa = 0.19, p < 0.0001). Cochran's Q test revealed no significant intraobserver variability in all 14 operators between round 1 and round 2 (all p>0.05).

Conclusions: We found no statistically significant inter- or intraobserver variability in the U-scoring of thyroid nodules between all participants reinforcing the validity of this scoring method in clinical practice, allaying concerns regarding potential subjective biases in reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound
Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Ultrasound is the official journal of the British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS), a multidisciplinary, charitable society comprising radiologists, obstetricians, sonographers, physicists and veterinarians amongst others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信