Leonard Mutema, Zivanai Chapanduka, Fungai Musaigwa, Nomusa Mashigo
{"title":"深入调查南非开普敦临床血液学门诊部申请全血细胞计数检验的周转时间。","authors":"Leonard Mutema, Zivanai Chapanduka, Fungai Musaigwa, Nomusa Mashigo","doi":"10.4102/ajlm.v10i1.1318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The performance of laboratories can be objectively assessed using the overall turn-around time (TAT). However, TAT is defined differently by the laboratory and clinicians; therefore, it is important to determine the contribution of all the different components making up the laboratory test cycle.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We carried out a retrospective analysis of the TAT of full blood count tests requested from the haematology outpatient department at Tygerberg Academic Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa, with an aim to assess laboratory performance and to identify critical steps influencing TAT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective audit was carried out, focused on the full blood count tests from the haematology outpatient department within a period of 3 months between 01 February and 30 April 2018. Data was extracted from the National Health Laboratory Service laboratory information system. The time intervals of all the phases of the test cycle were determined and total TAT and within-laboratory (intra-lab) TAT were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1176 tests were analysed. The total TAT median was 275 (interquartile range [IQR] 200.0-1537.7) min with the most prolonged phase being from authorisation to review by clinicians (median 114 min; IQR: 37.0-1338.5 min). The median intra-lab TAT was 55 (IQR 40-81) min and 90% of the samples were processed in the laboratory within 134 min of registration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings showed that the intra-lab TAT was within the set internal benchmark of 3 h. Operational phases that were independent of the laboratory processes contributed the most to total TAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":45412,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"1318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-depth investigation of turn-around time of full blood count tests requested from a clinical haematology outpatient department in Cape Town, South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Leonard Mutema, Zivanai Chapanduka, Fungai Musaigwa, Nomusa Mashigo\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/ajlm.v10i1.1318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The performance of laboratories can be objectively assessed using the overall turn-around time (TAT). However, TAT is defined differently by the laboratory and clinicians; therefore, it is important to determine the contribution of all the different components making up the laboratory test cycle.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We carried out a retrospective analysis of the TAT of full blood count tests requested from the haematology outpatient department at Tygerberg Academic Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa, with an aim to assess laboratory performance and to identify critical steps influencing TAT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective audit was carried out, focused on the full blood count tests from the haematology outpatient department within a period of 3 months between 01 February and 30 April 2018. Data was extracted from the National Health Laboratory Service laboratory information system. The time intervals of all the phases of the test cycle were determined and total TAT and within-laboratory (intra-lab) TAT were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1176 tests were analysed. The total TAT median was 275 (interquartile range [IQR] 200.0-1537.7) min with the most prolonged phase being from authorisation to review by clinicians (median 114 min; IQR: 37.0-1338.5 min). The median intra-lab TAT was 55 (IQR 40-81) min and 90% of the samples were processed in the laboratory within 134 min of registration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings showed that the intra-lab TAT was within the set internal benchmark of 3 h. Operational phases that were independent of the laboratory processes contributed the most to total TAT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111617/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v10i1.1318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v10i1.1318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:实验室的绩效可以通过总体周转时间(TAT)进行客观评估。然而,实验室和临床医生对 TAT 的定义各不相同;因此,确定构成实验室检验周期的所有不同组成部分的贡献非常重要:我们对南非开普敦泰格贝格学术医院(Tygerberg Academic Hospital)血液学门诊部申请的全血细胞计数检验的TAT进行了回顾性分析,目的是评估实验室绩效并确定影响TAT的关键步骤:在2018年2月1日至4月30日的3个月内,对血液学门诊部的全血细胞计数检验进行了回顾性审核。数据提取自国家卫生实验室服务实验室信息系统。确定了检验周期所有阶段的时间间隔,并计算了总TAT和实验室内(实验室内)TAT:结果:共分析了 1176 项检验。总 TAT 中位数为 275 分钟(四分位数间距 [IQR]:200.0-1537.7),从授权到临床医生审核的阶段时间最长(中位数为 114 分钟;IQR:37.0-1338.5 分钟)。实验室内 TAT 的中位数为 55(IQR 40-81)分钟,90% 的样本在登记后 134 分钟内完成实验室处理:我们的研究结果表明,实验室内的总处理时间在设定的内部基准 3 小时之内。
In-depth investigation of turn-around time of full blood count tests requested from a clinical haematology outpatient department in Cape Town, South Africa.
Background: The performance of laboratories can be objectively assessed using the overall turn-around time (TAT). However, TAT is defined differently by the laboratory and clinicians; therefore, it is important to determine the contribution of all the different components making up the laboratory test cycle.
Objective: We carried out a retrospective analysis of the TAT of full blood count tests requested from the haematology outpatient department at Tygerberg Academic Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa, with an aim to assess laboratory performance and to identify critical steps influencing TAT.
Methods: A retrospective audit was carried out, focused on the full blood count tests from the haematology outpatient department within a period of 3 months between 01 February and 30 April 2018. Data was extracted from the National Health Laboratory Service laboratory information system. The time intervals of all the phases of the test cycle were determined and total TAT and within-laboratory (intra-lab) TAT were calculated.
Results: A total of 1176 tests were analysed. The total TAT median was 275 (interquartile range [IQR] 200.0-1537.7) min with the most prolonged phase being from authorisation to review by clinicians (median 114 min; IQR: 37.0-1338.5 min). The median intra-lab TAT was 55 (IQR 40-81) min and 90% of the samples were processed in the laboratory within 134 min of registration.
Conclusion: Our findings showed that the intra-lab TAT was within the set internal benchmark of 3 h. Operational phases that were independent of the laboratory processes contributed the most to total TAT.
期刊介绍:
The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, the official journal of ASLM, focuses on the role of the laboratory and its professionals in the clinical and public healthcare sectors,and is specifically based on an African frame of reference. Emphasis is on all aspects that promote and contribute to the laboratory medicine practices of Africa. This includes, amongst others: laboratories, biomedical scientists and clinicians, medical community, public health officials and policy makers, laboratory systems and policies (translation of laboratory knowledge, practices and technologies in clinical care), interfaces of laboratory with medical science, laboratory-based epidemiology, laboratory investigations, evidence-based effectiveness in real world (actual) settings.