{"title":"社会功能是人格障碍的良好替代测量指标吗?","authors":"Peter Tyrer, Min Yang, Helen Tyrer, Mike Crawford","doi":"10.1002/pmh.1513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personality assessment may be helped by proxy measures.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the assessment of social functioning in relationship to personality disorder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Secondary analysis of data from three clinical studies, following deliberate self-harm (n = 460), cognitive behaviour therapy for health anxiety (n = 444) and a 30-year follow-up of 200 anxious/depressed patients. Social function and personality were assessed using the Social Functioning Questionnaire (SFQ) and the Personality Assessment Schedule, with its ICD-11 modification. A 5-item short version of the SFQ, the Short Social Functioning Questionnaire (SSFQ), was also developed. The SFQ score in the first two studies (area under curve [AUC] 0.64 and 0.65) partly predicted personality status; in the third study, this achieved close agreement (AUC SFQ 0.85 [95% CI 0.8-0.9]; AUC SSFQ 0.84 [95% CI 0.78-0.89]). In all studies, social function deteriorated linearly with increasing personality pathology. Cut-off points of 4 on the SSFQ and 7 on the SFQ had high sensitivity (SSFQ 82%-90%; SFQ 82%-83%) and acceptable specificity (SSFQ 66%-75%; SFQ 69%-75%) in identifying personality disorder in the third study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social functioning recorded in either a 5-item or 8-item self-rating is a useful proxy measure of personality disturbance and may be the core of disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":46871,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Mental Health","volume":"15 4","pages":"261-272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is social function a good proxy measure of personality disorder?\",\"authors\":\"Peter Tyrer, Min Yang, Helen Tyrer, Mike Crawford\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmh.1513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personality assessment may be helped by proxy measures.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the assessment of social functioning in relationship to personality disorder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Secondary analysis of data from three clinical studies, following deliberate self-harm (n = 460), cognitive behaviour therapy for health anxiety (n = 444) and a 30-year follow-up of 200 anxious/depressed patients. Social function and personality were assessed using the Social Functioning Questionnaire (SFQ) and the Personality Assessment Schedule, with its ICD-11 modification. A 5-item short version of the SFQ, the Short Social Functioning Questionnaire (SSFQ), was also developed. The SFQ score in the first two studies (area under curve [AUC] 0.64 and 0.65) partly predicted personality status; in the third study, this achieved close agreement (AUC SFQ 0.85 [95% CI 0.8-0.9]; AUC SSFQ 0.84 [95% CI 0.78-0.89]). In all studies, social function deteriorated linearly with increasing personality pathology. Cut-off points of 4 on the SSFQ and 7 on the SFQ had high sensitivity (SSFQ 82%-90%; SFQ 82%-83%) and acceptable specificity (SSFQ 66%-75%; SFQ 69%-75%) in identifying personality disorder in the third study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social functioning recorded in either a 5-item or 8-item self-rating is a useful proxy measure of personality disturbance and may be the core of disorder.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"261-272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475642/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1513\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:人格评估可借助替代测量:目的:研究社会功能评估与人格障碍的关系:对三项临床研究的数据进行二次分析,这三项临床研究分别针对故意自残(460人)、健康焦虑认知行为疗法(444人)以及200名焦虑/抑郁患者的30年随访。社会功能和人格采用社会功能问卷(SFQ)和人格评估表(ICD-11修订版)进行评估。此外,还开发了一个包含 5 个项目的简短版 SFQ,即社交功能简短问卷(SSFQ)。在前两项研究中,SFQ得分(曲线下面积[AUC] 0.64和0.65)部分预测了人格状况;在第三项研究中,SFQ得分与人格状况的预测结果接近(AUC SFQ 0.85 [95% CI 0.8-0.9];AUC SSFQ 0.84 [95% CI 0.78-0.89])。在所有研究中,随着人格病理程度的增加,社会功能呈线性下降。在第三项研究中,SSFQ的4分和SFQ的7分在识别人格障碍方面具有较高的灵敏度(SSFQ为82%-90%;SFQ为82%-83%)和可接受的特异性(SSFQ为66%-75%;SFQ为69%-75%):结论:以 5 项或 8 项自我评分记录的社会功能是人格障碍的有效替代测量指标,可能是人格障碍的核心。
Is social function a good proxy measure of personality disorder?
Background: Personality assessment may be helped by proxy measures.
Aims: To examine the assessment of social functioning in relationship to personality disorder.
Method: Secondary analysis of data from three clinical studies, following deliberate self-harm (n = 460), cognitive behaviour therapy for health anxiety (n = 444) and a 30-year follow-up of 200 anxious/depressed patients. Social function and personality were assessed using the Social Functioning Questionnaire (SFQ) and the Personality Assessment Schedule, with its ICD-11 modification. A 5-item short version of the SFQ, the Short Social Functioning Questionnaire (SSFQ), was also developed. The SFQ score in the first two studies (area under curve [AUC] 0.64 and 0.65) partly predicted personality status; in the third study, this achieved close agreement (AUC SFQ 0.85 [95% CI 0.8-0.9]; AUC SSFQ 0.84 [95% CI 0.78-0.89]). In all studies, social function deteriorated linearly with increasing personality pathology. Cut-off points of 4 on the SSFQ and 7 on the SFQ had high sensitivity (SSFQ 82%-90%; SFQ 82%-83%) and acceptable specificity (SSFQ 66%-75%; SFQ 69%-75%) in identifying personality disorder in the third study.
Conclusions: Social functioning recorded in either a 5-item or 8-item self-rating is a useful proxy measure of personality disturbance and may be the core of disorder.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Mental Health: Multidisciplinary Studies from Personality Dysfunction to Criminal Behaviour aims to lead and shape the international field in this rapidly expanding area, uniting three distinct literatures: DSM-IV/ICD-10 defined personality disorders, psychopathy and offending behaviour. Through its multi-disciplinary and service orientated approach, Personality and Mental Health provides a peer-reviewed, authoritative resource for researchers, practitioners and policy makers working in the areas of personality and mental health.