股骨近端骨折类型对肢体功能及日常生活活动的影响。

Physical therapy research Pub Date : 2020-09-28 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1298/ptr.E10050
Daisuke Bai, Mitsunori Tokuda, Taiki Ikemoto, Shingo Sugimori, Shoki Okamura, Yuka Yamada, Yuna Tomita, Yuki Morikawa, Yasuhito Tanaka
{"title":"股骨近端骨折类型对肢体功能及日常生活活动的影响。","authors":"Daisuke Bai,&nbsp;Mitsunori Tokuda,&nbsp;Taiki Ikemoto,&nbsp;Shingo Sugimori,&nbsp;Shoki Okamura,&nbsp;Yuka Yamada,&nbsp;Yuna Tomita,&nbsp;Yuki Morikawa,&nbsp;Yasuhito Tanaka","doi":"10.1298/ptr.E10050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess physical function such as lower limb function and Activities of Daily Living after surgery for proximal femoral fractures ( unstable medial femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fracture).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 68 patients with proximal femoral fractures. Isometric knee extension strength (IKES), the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) hip score, and the number of days required to develop straight leg raising, transfer, and T-caneassisted gait abilities to become independent were assessed. Patients were classified based on the types of proximal femoral fractures, namely unstable medial femoral neck fracture (bipolar hip arthroplasty [BHA] group), stable trochanteric fracture (S group), and unstable trochanteric fracture (US group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IKES and the JOA hip score were significantly better in the BHA group than in the S and US groups. IKES and the JOA hip score were significantly worse in the US group than in the BHA and S groups. Both transfer and T-cane-assisted gait abilities of patients in the BHA and S groups were indifferent. However, all physical functions were significantly worse in the US group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study results suggested that physical therapists plan the different rehabilitation program for the patients with proximal femoral fractures who were classified into three types, namely unstable medial femoral neck fracture, stable trochanteric fracture, and unstable trochanteric fracture, instead of two types.</p>","PeriodicalId":74445,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy research","volume":"24 1","pages":"24-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111412/pdf/ptr-24-01-0024.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of types of proximal femoral fractures on physical function such as lower limb function and Activities of Daily Living.\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Bai,&nbsp;Mitsunori Tokuda,&nbsp;Taiki Ikemoto,&nbsp;Shingo Sugimori,&nbsp;Shoki Okamura,&nbsp;Yuka Yamada,&nbsp;Yuna Tomita,&nbsp;Yuki Morikawa,&nbsp;Yasuhito Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1298/ptr.E10050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess physical function such as lower limb function and Activities of Daily Living after surgery for proximal femoral fractures ( unstable medial femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fracture).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 68 patients with proximal femoral fractures. Isometric knee extension strength (IKES), the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) hip score, and the number of days required to develop straight leg raising, transfer, and T-caneassisted gait abilities to become independent were assessed. Patients were classified based on the types of proximal femoral fractures, namely unstable medial femoral neck fracture (bipolar hip arthroplasty [BHA] group), stable trochanteric fracture (S group), and unstable trochanteric fracture (US group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IKES and the JOA hip score were significantly better in the BHA group than in the S and US groups. IKES and the JOA hip score were significantly worse in the US group than in the BHA and S groups. Both transfer and T-cane-assisted gait abilities of patients in the BHA and S groups were indifferent. However, all physical functions were significantly worse in the US group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study results suggested that physical therapists plan the different rehabilitation program for the patients with proximal femoral fractures who were classified into three types, namely unstable medial femoral neck fracture, stable trochanteric fracture, and unstable trochanteric fracture, instead of two types.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical therapy research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"24-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111412/pdf/ptr-24-01-0024.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical therapy research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估股骨近端骨折(不稳定股骨颈内侧骨折和股骨粗隆骨折)术后的肢体功能,如下肢功能和日常生活活动。方法:本研究纳入68例股骨近端骨折患者。评估等长膝关节伸展强度(kes)、日本骨科协会(JOA)髋关节评分,以及发展直腿抬高、转移和t -can辅助步态能力以独立所需的天数。根据股骨近端骨折类型对患者进行分类,分别为不稳定股骨内侧颈骨折(双相髋关节置换术[BHA]组)、稳定粗隆骨折(S组)和不稳定粗隆骨折(US组)。结果:BHA组的kes和JOA髋关节评分明显优于S和US组。美国组的kes和JOA髋关节评分明显低于BHA和S组。BHA组和S组患者的转移和t -手杖辅助步态能力均无差异。然而,美国组的所有身体机能都明显更差。结论:我们的研究结果表明,物理治疗师对股骨近端骨折患者的康复方案不同,将其分为不稳定股骨颈内侧骨折、稳定股骨粗隆骨折和不稳定股骨粗隆骨折三种类型,而不是两种类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of types of proximal femoral fractures on physical function such as lower limb function and Activities of Daily Living.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess physical function such as lower limb function and Activities of Daily Living after surgery for proximal femoral fractures ( unstable medial femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fracture).

Methods: This study enrolled 68 patients with proximal femoral fractures. Isometric knee extension strength (IKES), the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) hip score, and the number of days required to develop straight leg raising, transfer, and T-caneassisted gait abilities to become independent were assessed. Patients were classified based on the types of proximal femoral fractures, namely unstable medial femoral neck fracture (bipolar hip arthroplasty [BHA] group), stable trochanteric fracture (S group), and unstable trochanteric fracture (US group).

Results: IKES and the JOA hip score were significantly better in the BHA group than in the S and US groups. IKES and the JOA hip score were significantly worse in the US group than in the BHA and S groups. Both transfer and T-cane-assisted gait abilities of patients in the BHA and S groups were indifferent. However, all physical functions were significantly worse in the US group.

Conclusions: Our study results suggested that physical therapists plan the different rehabilitation program for the patients with proximal femoral fractures who were classified into three types, namely unstable medial femoral neck fracture, stable trochanteric fracture, and unstable trochanteric fracture, instead of two types.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信