多发性骨髓瘤的MRD评估:进展与挑战。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports Pub Date : 2021-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-05 DOI:10.1007/s11899-021-00633-5
Luca Bertamini, Mattia D'Agostino, Francesca Gay
{"title":"多发性骨髓瘤的MRD评估:进展与挑战。","authors":"Luca Bertamini,&nbsp;Mattia D'Agostino,&nbsp;Francesca Gay","doi":"10.1007/s11899-021-00633-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Over the last decade, the development of effective treatment approaches for multiple myeloma (MM) has been associated with higher response rates and longer survival. In patients who achieve complete response, several high sensitivity techniques have been studied to assess minimal residual disease (MRD) and detect residual neoplastic cells within the bone marrow (by flow cytometry or molecular biology techniques) or outside the bone marrow (by imaging or circulating disease markers in the peripheral blood). This is of utmost importance, since residual disease can drive clinical relapse. This review focuses on the progress made in the assessment of MRD in MM.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The achievement of MRD negativity after therapy is considered prognostically important for MM patients, and data from clinical trials and meta-analyses have confirmed that it is strongly associated with better survival. Along with well-known techniques, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), next-generation flow (NGF), and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), other methods such as mass spectrometry (MS) and circulating tumor cells are under study. Intensive treatment regimens at diagnosis can lead up to 70% of MRD negativity in MM patients, although the current proportion of curable patients is still unknown. Today, clinicians who treat MM deal with MRD assessment in routine clinical practice. Its appropriate use in therapeutic decision making may be the most fascinating and challenging issue to be addressed over the next few years.</p>","PeriodicalId":10852,"journal":{"name":"Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11899-021-00633-5","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRD Assessment in Multiple Myeloma: Progress and Challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Luca Bertamini,&nbsp;Mattia D'Agostino,&nbsp;Francesca Gay\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11899-021-00633-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Over the last decade, the development of effective treatment approaches for multiple myeloma (MM) has been associated with higher response rates and longer survival. In patients who achieve complete response, several high sensitivity techniques have been studied to assess minimal residual disease (MRD) and detect residual neoplastic cells within the bone marrow (by flow cytometry or molecular biology techniques) or outside the bone marrow (by imaging or circulating disease markers in the peripheral blood). This is of utmost importance, since residual disease can drive clinical relapse. This review focuses on the progress made in the assessment of MRD in MM.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The achievement of MRD negativity after therapy is considered prognostically important for MM patients, and data from clinical trials and meta-analyses have confirmed that it is strongly associated with better survival. Along with well-known techniques, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), next-generation flow (NGF), and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), other methods such as mass spectrometry (MS) and circulating tumor cells are under study. Intensive treatment regimens at diagnosis can lead up to 70% of MRD negativity in MM patients, although the current proportion of curable patients is still unknown. Today, clinicians who treat MM deal with MRD assessment in routine clinical practice. Its appropriate use in therapeutic decision making may be the most fascinating and challenging issue to be addressed over the next few years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11899-021-00633-5\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-021-00633-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-021-00633-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

回顾目的:在过去的十年中,多发性骨髓瘤(MM)有效治疗方法的发展与更高的缓解率和更长的生存期相关。在完全缓解的患者中,已经研究了几种高灵敏度技术来评估最小残留疾病(MRD)并检测骨髓内(通过流式细胞术或分子生物学技术)或骨髓外(通过成像或外周血循环疾病标志物)的残留肿瘤细胞。这是最重要的,因为残留的疾病可以驱动临床复发。最近的研究发现:治疗后MRD阴性被认为对MM患者的预后很重要,临床试验和荟萃分析的数据证实,MRD阴性与更好的生存率密切相关。除了众所周知的技术,如下一代测序(NGS),下一代流动(NGF)和正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT),其他方法,如质谱(MS)和循环肿瘤细胞也在研究中。诊断时的强化治疗方案可导致MM患者中高达70%的MRD阴性,尽管目前可治愈患者的比例仍然未知。今天,治疗MM的临床医生在常规临床实践中处理MRD评估。它在治疗决策中的适当使用可能是未来几年需要解决的最令人着迷和最具挑战性的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MRD Assessment in Multiple Myeloma: Progress and Challenges.

Purpose of review: Over the last decade, the development of effective treatment approaches for multiple myeloma (MM) has been associated with higher response rates and longer survival. In patients who achieve complete response, several high sensitivity techniques have been studied to assess minimal residual disease (MRD) and detect residual neoplastic cells within the bone marrow (by flow cytometry or molecular biology techniques) or outside the bone marrow (by imaging or circulating disease markers in the peripheral blood). This is of utmost importance, since residual disease can drive clinical relapse. This review focuses on the progress made in the assessment of MRD in MM.

Recent findings: The achievement of MRD negativity after therapy is considered prognostically important for MM patients, and data from clinical trials and meta-analyses have confirmed that it is strongly associated with better survival. Along with well-known techniques, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), next-generation flow (NGF), and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), other methods such as mass spectrometry (MS) and circulating tumor cells are under study. Intensive treatment regimens at diagnosis can lead up to 70% of MRD negativity in MM patients, although the current proportion of curable patients is still unknown. Today, clinicians who treat MM deal with MRD assessment in routine clinical practice. Its appropriate use in therapeutic decision making may be the most fascinating and challenging issue to be addressed over the next few years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: his journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of hematologic malignancy. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma, and T-cell and other lymphoproliferative malignancies. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信