一种新型混合方法平台研究方案,用于研究新型手术设备,具有嵌入式共享学习:Ibra-net乳房病变定位研究。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hannah L Bromley, Rajiv Dave, Chris Holcombe, Shelley Potter, Anthony J Maxwell, Cliona Kirwan, Senthurun Mylvaganam, Suzanne Elgammal, Jenna Morgan, Sue Down, Tahir Masudi, Amtul Sami, Nicola Barnes, James Harvey
{"title":"一种新型混合方法平台研究方案,用于研究新型手术设备,具有嵌入式共享学习:Ibra-net乳房病变定位研究。","authors":"Hannah L Bromley,&nbsp;Rajiv Dave,&nbsp;Chris Holcombe,&nbsp;Shelley Potter,&nbsp;Anthony J Maxwell,&nbsp;Cliona Kirwan,&nbsp;Senthurun Mylvaganam,&nbsp;Suzanne Elgammal,&nbsp;Jenna Morgan,&nbsp;Sue Down,&nbsp;Tahir Masudi,&nbsp;Amtul Sami,&nbsp;Nicola Barnes,&nbsp;James Harvey","doi":"10.29337/ijsp.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>New medical devices must have adequate research, such that outcomes are known, enabling patients to be consented with knowledge of the safety and efficacy of the device to be implanted. Device trials are challenging due to the learning curve and iterative assessment of best practice. This study is designed to pilot a national collaborative approach to medical device introduction by breast surgeons in the UK, using breast localisation devices as an exemplar. The aim is to develop an effective and transferable surgical device platform protocol design, with embedded shared learning.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The iBRA-net localisation study is a UK based prospective, multi-centre platform study, comparing the safety and efficacy of novel localisation devices with wire-guided breast lesion localisation for wide local excision, using Magseed® as the pilot intervention group. Centres performing breast lesion localisation for wide local excision or excision biopsy will be eligible to participate if using one of the included devices. Further intervention arms will be added as new devices are CE marked. Outcomes will be collected via an online database. The primary outcome measure will be identification of the index lesion. Participating surgeons will be asked to record shared learning events via online questionnaires and focus group interviews to inform future study arms.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The study will aim to collect data on 950 procedures for each intervention (Magseed® and wire localisation) from UK breast centres over an 18-month period. Shared learning will be prospectively evaluated via thematic analysis to refine breast localisation technique and to promote early identification of potential pitfalls and problems. Results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in peer reviewed journals.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This is a UK national audit registered with Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>This protocol outlines a novel methodology for a collaborative national platform study to collate safety and efficacy data on new medical devices. Improved registration and audit of new medical devices is a major theme of the Cumberlege report of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review.We outline a protocol for a UK based multi-centre prospective audit to investigate the safety and efficacy of new surgical devices for breast lesion localisation. The study will run as a platform study using wire localisation as a control group and Magseed® as the first intervention arm.The protocol is designed for additional bolt-on intervention arms for other localisation devices, such as Hologic Localizer™ and Savi Scout®, when they become available to the European market. This will enable comparison of these devices to datasets already collected on wire and Magseed® localisation.The study includes a novel shared learning methodology using iterative online database reporting and surgical interviews to centrally distribute information on learning events, critical governance issues and recommended protocols for future use.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114848/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Mixed-Methods Platform Study Protocol for Investigating New Surgical Devices, with Embedded Shared Learning: Ibra-net Breast Lesion Localisation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah L Bromley,&nbsp;Rajiv Dave,&nbsp;Chris Holcombe,&nbsp;Shelley Potter,&nbsp;Anthony J Maxwell,&nbsp;Cliona Kirwan,&nbsp;Senthurun Mylvaganam,&nbsp;Suzanne Elgammal,&nbsp;Jenna Morgan,&nbsp;Sue Down,&nbsp;Tahir Masudi,&nbsp;Amtul Sami,&nbsp;Nicola Barnes,&nbsp;James Harvey\",\"doi\":\"10.29337/ijsp.136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>New medical devices must have adequate research, such that outcomes are known, enabling patients to be consented with knowledge of the safety and efficacy of the device to be implanted. Device trials are challenging due to the learning curve and iterative assessment of best practice. This study is designed to pilot a national collaborative approach to medical device introduction by breast surgeons in the UK, using breast localisation devices as an exemplar. The aim is to develop an effective and transferable surgical device platform protocol design, with embedded shared learning.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The iBRA-net localisation study is a UK based prospective, multi-centre platform study, comparing the safety and efficacy of novel localisation devices with wire-guided breast lesion localisation for wide local excision, using Magseed® as the pilot intervention group. Centres performing breast lesion localisation for wide local excision or excision biopsy will be eligible to participate if using one of the included devices. Further intervention arms will be added as new devices are CE marked. Outcomes will be collected via an online database. The primary outcome measure will be identification of the index lesion. Participating surgeons will be asked to record shared learning events via online questionnaires and focus group interviews to inform future study arms.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The study will aim to collect data on 950 procedures for each intervention (Magseed® and wire localisation) from UK breast centres over an 18-month period. Shared learning will be prospectively evaluated via thematic analysis to refine breast localisation technique and to promote early identification of potential pitfalls and problems. Results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in peer reviewed journals.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This is a UK national audit registered with Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>This protocol outlines a novel methodology for a collaborative national platform study to collate safety and efficacy data on new medical devices. Improved registration and audit of new medical devices is a major theme of the Cumberlege report of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review.We outline a protocol for a UK based multi-centre prospective audit to investigate the safety and efficacy of new surgical devices for breast lesion localisation. The study will run as a platform study using wire localisation as a control group and Magseed® as the first intervention arm.The protocol is designed for additional bolt-on intervention arms for other localisation devices, such as Hologic Localizer™ and Savi Scout®, when they become available to the European market. This will enable comparison of these devices to datasets already collected on wire and Magseed® localisation.The study includes a novel shared learning methodology using iterative online database reporting and surgical interviews to centrally distribute information on learning events, critical governance issues and recommended protocols for future use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114848/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.136\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.136","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

导言:新的医疗器械必须有充分的研究,这样的结果是已知的,使患者同意了解植入设备的安全性和有效性。由于学习曲线和最佳实践的迭代评估,设备试验具有挑战性。本研究的目的是试点一个国家合作的方法,以医疗设备引进乳房外科医生在英国,使用乳房定位装置为例。目的是开发一种有效的、可转移的手术器械平台协议设计,并嵌入共享学习。方法和分析:iBRA-net定位研究是一项基于英国的前瞻性,多中心平台研究,比较新型定位装置与线导乳房病变定位的安全性和有效性,用于广泛的局部切除,使用Magseed®作为试点干预组。如果使用其中一种设备,进行乳房病变定位进行广泛局部切除或切除活检的中心将有资格参加。随着新设备获得CE标志,将增加进一步的干预臂。结果将通过在线数据库收集。主要的结果测量将是主要病变的识别。参与的外科医生将被要求通过在线问卷和焦点小组访谈记录共享的学习事件,以告知未来的研究部门。伦理和传播:该研究旨在收集来自英国乳腺中心的950例干预(Magseed®和钢丝定位)的数据,为期18个月。将通过专题分析对共享学习进行前瞻性评估,以改进乳房定位技术,并促进早期识别潜在的陷阱和问题。研究结果将在国内和国际会议上发表,并发表在同行评议的期刊上。注册:这是在曼彻斯特大学NHS基金会信托基金注册的英国国家审计。重点:本协议概述了一种新的方法,用于国家合作平台研究,以整理新医疗器械的安全性和有效性数据。改进新医疗器械的注册和审核是独立药品和医疗器械安全审查的Cumberlege报告的一个主要主题。我们概述了一项基于英国的多中心前瞻性审计的协议,以调查用于乳房病变定位的新手术设备的安全性和有效性。该研究将作为一个平台研究,使用导线定位作为对照组,Magseed®作为第一个干预组。该协议旨在为其他定位设备(如Hologic Localizer™和Savi Scout®)提供额外的螺栓式干预臂,当它们在欧洲市场上市时。这将使这些设备与已经在wire和Magseed®本地化上收集的数据集进行比较。该研究包括一种新的共享学习方法,使用迭代在线数据库报告和外科访谈来集中分发有关学习事件、关键治理问题和未来使用的推荐协议的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Novel Mixed-Methods Platform Study Protocol for Investigating New Surgical Devices, with Embedded Shared Learning: Ibra-net Breast Lesion Localisation Study.

Introduction: New medical devices must have adequate research, such that outcomes are known, enabling patients to be consented with knowledge of the safety and efficacy of the device to be implanted. Device trials are challenging due to the learning curve and iterative assessment of best practice. This study is designed to pilot a national collaborative approach to medical device introduction by breast surgeons in the UK, using breast localisation devices as an exemplar. The aim is to develop an effective and transferable surgical device platform protocol design, with embedded shared learning.

Methods and analysis: The iBRA-net localisation study is a UK based prospective, multi-centre platform study, comparing the safety and efficacy of novel localisation devices with wire-guided breast lesion localisation for wide local excision, using Magseed® as the pilot intervention group. Centres performing breast lesion localisation for wide local excision or excision biopsy will be eligible to participate if using one of the included devices. Further intervention arms will be added as new devices are CE marked. Outcomes will be collected via an online database. The primary outcome measure will be identification of the index lesion. Participating surgeons will be asked to record shared learning events via online questionnaires and focus group interviews to inform future study arms.

Ethics and dissemination: The study will aim to collect data on 950 procedures for each intervention (Magseed® and wire localisation) from UK breast centres over an 18-month period. Shared learning will be prospectively evaluated via thematic analysis to refine breast localisation technique and to promote early identification of potential pitfalls and problems. Results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in peer reviewed journals.

Registration: This is a UK national audit registered with Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust.

Highlights: This protocol outlines a novel methodology for a collaborative national platform study to collate safety and efficacy data on new medical devices. Improved registration and audit of new medical devices is a major theme of the Cumberlege report of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review.We outline a protocol for a UK based multi-centre prospective audit to investigate the safety and efficacy of new surgical devices for breast lesion localisation. The study will run as a platform study using wire localisation as a control group and Magseed® as the first intervention arm.The protocol is designed for additional bolt-on intervention arms for other localisation devices, such as Hologic Localizer™ and Savi Scout®, when they become available to the European market. This will enable comparison of these devices to datasets already collected on wire and Magseed® localisation.The study includes a novel shared learning methodology using iterative online database reporting and surgical interviews to centrally distribute information on learning events, critical governance issues and recommended protocols for future use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信