条件反射刺激强度对条件性疼痛调节(CPM)痛觉减退的影响。

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alexia Coulombe-Lévêque, Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme, Guillaume Léonard, Serge Marchand
{"title":"条件反射刺激强度对条件性疼痛调节(CPM)痛觉减退的影响。","authors":"Alexia Coulombe-Lévêque,&nbsp;Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme,&nbsp;Guillaume Léonard,&nbsp;Serge Marchand","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2020.1855972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The magnitude and duration of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) likely depends on the nature and intensity of the conditioning stimulus (CS). <b>Aims</b>: The aim of this study was to measure the effect of CS intensity on the duration of CPM hypoalgesia. <b>Methods</b>: In this single-blind, nonrandomized, repeated measures study, we assessed CPM hypoalgesia in 20 healthy participants following cold pressor tests (CPT) at 7°C and 12°C. The test stimulus, a 60-s heat stimulation, was administered before the CPT and immediately after, and again at 5-min intervals until participants' pain scores returned to pre-CS levels. Two hypoalgesia thresholds were used to establish return to pre-CS level: within -10/100 of baseline and within -20/100 of baseline. <b>Results</b>: CPM hypoalgesia, when defined as a reduction in pain levels >10/100, did not last longer following the more intense 7°C CPT compared to the 12°C CPT (32 min vs. 20 min, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.06); similar results were obtained when CPM hypoalgesia was defined as a reduction in pain levels of >20/100 (16 min following the 7°C CPT vs. 9 min following the 12°C CPT; <i>P</i> = 0.33). The duration of CPM hypoalgesia was significantly longer when the 10/100 threshold was used compared to the 20/100 threshold, regardless of CPT temperature (<i>P</i> = 0.008 for the 12°C CPT; <i>P</i> < 0.001 for the 7°C CPT). <b>Conclusions</b>: The more intense CS did not induce CPM hypoalgesia of longer duration compared to the less intense CS. The choice of threshold for what constitutes CPM hypoalgesia did have a significant effect on the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"5 1","pages":"22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24740527.2020.1855972","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of conditioning stimulus intensity on conditioned pain modulation (CPM) hypoalgesia.\",\"authors\":\"Alexia Coulombe-Lévêque,&nbsp;Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme,&nbsp;Guillaume Léonard,&nbsp;Serge Marchand\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24740527.2020.1855972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The magnitude and duration of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) likely depends on the nature and intensity of the conditioning stimulus (CS). <b>Aims</b>: The aim of this study was to measure the effect of CS intensity on the duration of CPM hypoalgesia. <b>Methods</b>: In this single-blind, nonrandomized, repeated measures study, we assessed CPM hypoalgesia in 20 healthy participants following cold pressor tests (CPT) at 7°C and 12°C. The test stimulus, a 60-s heat stimulation, was administered before the CPT and immediately after, and again at 5-min intervals until participants' pain scores returned to pre-CS levels. Two hypoalgesia thresholds were used to establish return to pre-CS level: within -10/100 of baseline and within -20/100 of baseline. <b>Results</b>: CPM hypoalgesia, when defined as a reduction in pain levels >10/100, did not last longer following the more intense 7°C CPT compared to the 12°C CPT (32 min vs. 20 min, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.06); similar results were obtained when CPM hypoalgesia was defined as a reduction in pain levels of >20/100 (16 min following the 7°C CPT vs. 9 min following the 12°C CPT; <i>P</i> = 0.33). The duration of CPM hypoalgesia was significantly longer when the 10/100 threshold was used compared to the 20/100 threshold, regardless of CPT temperature (<i>P</i> = 0.008 for the 12°C CPT; <i>P</i> < 0.001 for the 7°C CPT). <b>Conclusions</b>: The more intense CS did not induce CPM hypoalgesia of longer duration compared to the less intense CS. The choice of threshold for what constitutes CPM hypoalgesia did have a significant effect on the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"22-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24740527.2020.1855972\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2020.1855972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2020.1855972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:条件性疼痛调节(CPM)的强度和持续时间可能取决于条件刺激(CS)的性质和强度。目的:本研究的目的是测量CS强度对CPM痛觉减退持续时间的影响。方法:在这项单盲、非随机、重复测量的研究中,我们评估了20名健康参与者在7°C和12°C的冷压试验(CPT)后的CPM痛觉减退。测试刺激是60秒热刺激,在CPT之前和之后立即进行,每隔5分钟进行一次,直到参与者的疼痛评分恢复到cs前的水平。使用两个痛觉减退阈值来确定恢复到cs前水平:在基线的-10/100内和在基线的-20/100内。结果:CPM疼痛减退,定义为疼痛水平降低>10/100,与12°C CPT相比,在更强烈的7°C CPT后持续时间并不更长(分别为32分钟和20分钟;P = 0.06);当CPM痛觉减退被定义为疼痛水平降低>20/100(7°C CPT后16分钟vs. 12°C CPT后9分钟)时,获得了类似的结果;P = 0.33)。与CPT温度无关,使用10/100阈值时CPM痛觉减退的持续时间明显长于使用20/100阈值时(P = 0.008,对于12°C CPT;7°C CPT P < 0.001)。结论:与低强度CS相比,高强度CS不会导致CPM持续时间更长。对于CPM痛觉减退的阈值的选择确实对结果有显著的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effect of conditioning stimulus intensity on conditioned pain modulation (CPM) hypoalgesia.

The effect of conditioning stimulus intensity on conditioned pain modulation (CPM) hypoalgesia.

The effect of conditioning stimulus intensity on conditioned pain modulation (CPM) hypoalgesia.

Background: The magnitude and duration of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) likely depends on the nature and intensity of the conditioning stimulus (CS). Aims: The aim of this study was to measure the effect of CS intensity on the duration of CPM hypoalgesia. Methods: In this single-blind, nonrandomized, repeated measures study, we assessed CPM hypoalgesia in 20 healthy participants following cold pressor tests (CPT) at 7°C and 12°C. The test stimulus, a 60-s heat stimulation, was administered before the CPT and immediately after, and again at 5-min intervals until participants' pain scores returned to pre-CS levels. Two hypoalgesia thresholds were used to establish return to pre-CS level: within -10/100 of baseline and within -20/100 of baseline. Results: CPM hypoalgesia, when defined as a reduction in pain levels >10/100, did not last longer following the more intense 7°C CPT compared to the 12°C CPT (32 min vs. 20 min, respectively; P = 0.06); similar results were obtained when CPM hypoalgesia was defined as a reduction in pain levels of >20/100 (16 min following the 7°C CPT vs. 9 min following the 12°C CPT; P = 0.33). The duration of CPM hypoalgesia was significantly longer when the 10/100 threshold was used compared to the 20/100 threshold, regardless of CPT temperature (P = 0.008 for the 12°C CPT; P < 0.001 for the 7°C CPT). Conclusions: The more intense CS did not induce CPM hypoalgesia of longer duration compared to the less intense CS. The choice of threshold for what constitutes CPM hypoalgesia did have a significant effect on the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信