法定不平等:国家法律中货币制裁的逻辑。

IF 3.9 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Brittany Friedman, Mary Pattillo
{"title":"法定不平等:国家法律中货币制裁的逻辑。","authors":"Brittany Friedman,&nbsp;Mary Pattillo","doi":"10.7758/rsf.2019.5.1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monetary sanctions mandated in state statutes include fines, fees, restitution, and other legal costs imposed on persons convicted of crimes and other legal violations. Drawing on content analysis of current legislative statutes in Illinois pertaining to monetary sanctions, we ask three questions: What are defendants expected to pay for and why? What accommodations exist for defendants' poverty? What are the consequences for nonpayment? We find that neoliberal logics of personal responsibility and carceral expansion suffuse these laws, establishing a basis for transferring public costs onto criminal defendants, offering little relief for poverty, and supporting severe additional penalties for unpaid debt. Statutory inequality legally authorizes further impoverishment of the poor, thereby increasing inequality. Major related organizing and advocacy work, however, has created an opening for significant changes toward greater fairness.</p>","PeriodicalId":51709,"journal":{"name":"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e5/06/nihms-1686136.PMC8059699.pdf","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statutory Inequality: The Logics of Monetary Sanctions in State Law.\",\"authors\":\"Brittany Friedman,&nbsp;Mary Pattillo\",\"doi\":\"10.7758/rsf.2019.5.1.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monetary sanctions mandated in state statutes include fines, fees, restitution, and other legal costs imposed on persons convicted of crimes and other legal violations. Drawing on content analysis of current legislative statutes in Illinois pertaining to monetary sanctions, we ask three questions: What are defendants expected to pay for and why? What accommodations exist for defendants' poverty? What are the consequences for nonpayment? We find that neoliberal logics of personal responsibility and carceral expansion suffuse these laws, establishing a basis for transferring public costs onto criminal defendants, offering little relief for poverty, and supporting severe additional penalties for unpaid debt. Statutory inequality legally authorizes further impoverishment of the poor, thereby increasing inequality. Major related organizing and advocacy work, however, has created an opening for significant changes toward greater fairness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e5/06/nihms-1686136.PMC8059699.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2019.5.1.08\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2019.5.1.08","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

州法规规定的经济制裁包括罚款、费用、赔偿和对被判犯罪或其他违法行为的人施加的其他法律费用。根据伊利诺斯州现行有关货币制裁的立法法规的内容分析,我们提出了三个问题:被告应该支付什么,为什么?对被告的贫困有什么安排?不付款的后果是什么?我们发现,个人责任和刑事扩张的新自由主义逻辑充斥着这些法律,为将公共成本转移到刑事被告身上奠定了基础,为贫困提供了很少的救济,并支持对未付债务进行严厉的额外惩罚。法定的不平等在法律上使穷人进一步贫困,从而加剧了不平等。然而,主要的相关组织和宣传工作为实现更大的公平创造了一个重大变化的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Statutory Inequality: The Logics of Monetary Sanctions in State Law.

Statutory Inequality: The Logics of Monetary Sanctions in State Law.

Monetary sanctions mandated in state statutes include fines, fees, restitution, and other legal costs imposed on persons convicted of crimes and other legal violations. Drawing on content analysis of current legislative statutes in Illinois pertaining to monetary sanctions, we ask three questions: What are defendants expected to pay for and why? What accommodations exist for defendants' poverty? What are the consequences for nonpayment? We find that neoliberal logics of personal responsibility and carceral expansion suffuse these laws, establishing a basis for transferring public costs onto criminal defendants, offering little relief for poverty, and supporting severe additional penalties for unpaid debt. Statutory inequality legally authorizes further impoverishment of the poor, thereby increasing inequality. Major related organizing and advocacy work, however, has created an opening for significant changes toward greater fairness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences
Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
43
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信