生物技术疟疾扫描仪在诺氏疟原虫和恶性疟原虫诊断中的性能评价。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PARASITOLOGY
Korean Journal of Parasitology Pub Date : 2021-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-22 DOI:10.3347/kjp.2021.59.2.113
Egy Rahman Firdaus, Ji-Hoon Park, Fauzi Muh, Seong-Kyun Lee, Jin-Hee Han, Chae-Seung Lim, Sung-Hun Na, Won Sun Park, Jeong-Hyun Park, Eun-Taek Han
{"title":"生物技术疟疾扫描仪在诺氏疟原虫和恶性疟原虫诊断中的性能评价。","authors":"Egy Rahman Firdaus,&nbsp;Ji-Hoon Park,&nbsp;Fauzi Muh,&nbsp;Seong-Kyun Lee,&nbsp;Jin-Hee Han,&nbsp;Chae-Seung Lim,&nbsp;Sung-Hun Na,&nbsp;Won Sun Park,&nbsp;Jeong-Hyun Park,&nbsp;Eun-Taek Han","doi":"10.3347/kjp.2021.59.2.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The computer vision diagnostic approach currently generates several malaria diagnostic tools. It enhances the accessible and straightforward diagnostics that necessary for clinics and health centers in malaria-endemic areas. A new computer malaria diagnostics tool called the malaria scanner was used to investigate living malaria parasites with easy sample preparation, fast and user-friendly. The cultured Plasmodium parasites were used to confirm the sensitivity of this technique then compared to fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis and light microscopic examination. The measured percentage of parasitemia by the malaria scanner revealed higher precision than microscopy and was similar to FACS. The coefficients of variation of this technique were 1.2-6.7% for Plasmodium knowlesi and 0.3-4.8% for P. falciparum. It allowed determining parasitemia levels of 0.1% or higher, with coefficient of variation smaller than 10%. In terms of the precision range of parasitemia, both high and low ranges showed similar precision results. Pearson's correlation test was used to evaluate the correlation data coming from all methods. A strong correlation of measured parasitemia (r2=0.99, P<0.05) was observed between each method. The parasitemia analysis using this new diagnostic tool needs technical improvement, particularly in the differentiation of malaria species.</p>","PeriodicalId":49938,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Parasitology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/e1/kjp-59-2-113.PMC8106981.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of Biozentech Malaria Scanner in Plasmodium knowlesi and P. falciparum as a New Diagnostic Tool.\",\"authors\":\"Egy Rahman Firdaus,&nbsp;Ji-Hoon Park,&nbsp;Fauzi Muh,&nbsp;Seong-Kyun Lee,&nbsp;Jin-Hee Han,&nbsp;Chae-Seung Lim,&nbsp;Sung-Hun Na,&nbsp;Won Sun Park,&nbsp;Jeong-Hyun Park,&nbsp;Eun-Taek Han\",\"doi\":\"10.3347/kjp.2021.59.2.113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The computer vision diagnostic approach currently generates several malaria diagnostic tools. It enhances the accessible and straightforward diagnostics that necessary for clinics and health centers in malaria-endemic areas. A new computer malaria diagnostics tool called the malaria scanner was used to investigate living malaria parasites with easy sample preparation, fast and user-friendly. The cultured Plasmodium parasites were used to confirm the sensitivity of this technique then compared to fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis and light microscopic examination. The measured percentage of parasitemia by the malaria scanner revealed higher precision than microscopy and was similar to FACS. The coefficients of variation of this technique were 1.2-6.7% for Plasmodium knowlesi and 0.3-4.8% for P. falciparum. It allowed determining parasitemia levels of 0.1% or higher, with coefficient of variation smaller than 10%. In terms of the precision range of parasitemia, both high and low ranges showed similar precision results. Pearson's correlation test was used to evaluate the correlation data coming from all methods. A strong correlation of measured parasitemia (r2=0.99, P<0.05) was observed between each method. The parasitemia analysis using this new diagnostic tool needs technical improvement, particularly in the differentiation of malaria species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Parasitology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/e1/kjp-59-2-113.PMC8106981.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Parasitology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2021.59.2.113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2021.59.2.113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

计算机视觉诊断方法目前产生了几种疟疾诊断工具。它加强了疟疾流行地区诊所和保健中心所需的可获得和直接的诊断。使用一种新的计算机疟疾诊断工具疟疾扫描仪对活的疟疾寄生虫进行调查,该工具样品制备简单、快速且用户友好。将培养的疟原虫与荧光活化细胞分选(FACS)和光镜检查进行比较,证实了该技术的敏感性。疟疾扫描仪测量的寄生虫病百分比显示出比显微镜更高的精度,并且与FACS相似。该方法的变异系数分别为诺氏疟原虫1.2 ~ 6.7%和恶性疟原虫0.3 ~ 4.8%。它允许测定0.1%或更高的寄生虫水平,变异系数小于10%。在寄生虫病检测的精度范围上,高、低精度范围均显示出相似的精度结果。采用Pearson相关检验对各方法的相关数据进行评价。测量到的寄生虫率有很强的相关性(r2=0.99, P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Performance Evaluation of Biozentech Malaria Scanner in Plasmodium knowlesi and P. falciparum as a New Diagnostic Tool.

Performance Evaluation of Biozentech Malaria Scanner in Plasmodium knowlesi and P. falciparum as a New Diagnostic Tool.

Performance Evaluation of Biozentech Malaria Scanner in Plasmodium knowlesi and P. falciparum as a New Diagnostic Tool.

The computer vision diagnostic approach currently generates several malaria diagnostic tools. It enhances the accessible and straightforward diagnostics that necessary for clinics and health centers in malaria-endemic areas. A new computer malaria diagnostics tool called the malaria scanner was used to investigate living malaria parasites with easy sample preparation, fast and user-friendly. The cultured Plasmodium parasites were used to confirm the sensitivity of this technique then compared to fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis and light microscopic examination. The measured percentage of parasitemia by the malaria scanner revealed higher precision than microscopy and was similar to FACS. The coefficients of variation of this technique were 1.2-6.7% for Plasmodium knowlesi and 0.3-4.8% for P. falciparum. It allowed determining parasitemia levels of 0.1% or higher, with coefficient of variation smaller than 10%. In terms of the precision range of parasitemia, both high and low ranges showed similar precision results. Pearson's correlation test was used to evaluate the correlation data coming from all methods. A strong correlation of measured parasitemia (r2=0.99, P<0.05) was observed between each method. The parasitemia analysis using this new diagnostic tool needs technical improvement, particularly in the differentiation of malaria species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Parasitology is the official journal paperless, on-line publication after Vol. 53, 2015 of The Korean Society for Parasitology and Tropical Medicine. Abbreviated title is ‘Korean J Parasitol’. It was launched in 1963. It contains original articles, case reports, brief communications, reviews or mini-reviews, book reviews, and letters to the editor on parasites of humans and animals, vectors, host-parasite relationships, zoonoses, and tropical medicine. It is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December each year. Supplement numbers are at times published. All of the manuscripts are peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信